The concept of symmetrical double-ended motorized spinning tethers for use as orbital transfer vehicles is introduced. The orbital elements of a payload released from above and below a hanging, prograde librating, and prograde spinning tether are derived and employed to evaluate the effectiveness of the three tether types along with their optimum configurations for payload transfer. A new ratio, the efficiency index, is defined as the altitude gain or loss half an orbit after tether release per tether length. The motorized tether is found to perform best and also most efficiently, improving by two orders of magnitude on the librating tether, which, in turn, improves on the hanging tether by a factor of two. A long motorized tether on a circular orbit can transfer an upper payload from a low to a geostationary Earth orbit by employing relatively high motor torque and a safety factor on the tether strength close to unity.
[1]
Robert P. Hoyt,et al.
FAILSAFE MULTILINE HOYTETHER LIFETIMES
,
1995
.
[2]
Les Johnson,et al.
Mission Analysis of Spinning Systems for Transfers from Low Orbits to Geostationary
,
2000
.
[3]
Joseph A. Carroll.
Tether applications in space transportation
,
1986
.
[4]
Bruce A. Conway,et al.
Advantages of tether release of satellites from elliptic orbits
,
1988
.
[5]
K. Kumar,et al.
Effects of deployment rates and librations on tethered payload raising
,
1992
.
[6]
Matthew P. Cartmell,et al.
Symmetrically laden motorised tethers for continuous two-way interplanetary payload exchange
,
1999
.
[7]
I. Bekey,et al.
Tethers Open New Space Options
,
1983
.