Wind Characteristics of Mesquite Streets in the Northern Chihuahuan Desert, New Mexico, USA

Past research has shown that the most important areas for active sand movement in the northern part of the Chihuahuan Desert are mesquite-dominated desert ecosystems possessing sandy soil texture. The most active sand movement in the mesquite-dominated ecosystems has been shown to take place on elongated bare soil patches referred to as “streets”. Aerodynamic properties of mesquite streets eroded by wind should be included in explaining how mesquite streets are more emissive sand sources than surrounding desert land. To understand the effects of wind properties, we measured them at two flat mesquite sites having highly similar soil textures but very different configurations of mesquite. The differences in wind properties at the two sites were caused by differences of size, orientation, and porosity of the mesquite, along with the presence of mesquite coppice dunes (sand dunes stabilized by mesquites growing in the dune and on its surface) found only at one of the two sites. Wind direction, u* (friction velocity), z0 (aerodynamic roughness height) and D (zero plane displacement height) were estimated for 15-m tower and 3-m mast data. These aerodynamic data allowed us to distinguish five categories with differing potentials for sediment transport. Sediment transport for the five categories varied from unrestricted, free transport to virtually no transport caused by vegetation protection from wind forces. In addition, “steering” of winds below the level of the tops of mesquite bushes and coppice dunes allowed longer parallel wind durations and increased wind erosion for streets that aligned roughly SW–NE.

[1]  H. Heywood The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes , 1941, Nature.

[2]  N. Lancaster,et al.  Influence of vegetation cover on sand transport by wind: field studies at Owens Lake, California , 1998 .

[3]  Gilles Bergametti,et al.  Modeling Flow Patterns in a Small Vegetated Area in the Northern Chihuahuan Desert using QUIC (Quick Urban & Industrial Complex) , 2006 .

[4]  P. A. Sheppard,et al.  Atmospheric Diffusion , 1962, Nature.

[5]  John A. Gillies,et al.  Field determination of drag forces and shear stress partitioning effects for a desert shrub (Sarcobatus vermiculatus, greasewood) , 2000 .

[6]  D. Gillette,et al.  Field measurement of the sheltering effect of vegetation on erodible land surfaces , 1990 .

[7]  G. Kocurek,et al.  Airflow up the stoss slope of sand dunes: limitations of current understanding , 1996 .

[8]  Charles Henry Brian Priestley,et al.  Turbulent Transfer in the Lower Atmosphere , 1959 .

[9]  B. Marticorena,et al.  Factors controlling threshold friction velocity in semiarid and arid areas of the United States , 1997 .

[10]  Dale A. Gillette,et al.  Sand flux in the northern Chihuahuan desert, New Mexico, USA, and the influence of mesquite‐dominated landscapes , 2004 .

[11]  D. Gillette,et al.  Large-scale variability of wind erosion mass flux rates , 1997 .

[12]  N. Woods,et al.  The entrapment of particles by windbreaks , 2001 .

[13]  William G. Nickling,et al.  Direct field measurement of wind drag on vegetation for application to windbreak design and modelling , 1998 .

[14]  William G. Nickling,et al.  SHEAR STRESS PARTITIONING IN SPARSELY VEGETATED DESERT CANOPIES , 1996 .

[15]  M. Raupach Drag and drag partition on rough surfaces , 1992 .

[16]  B. R. White,et al.  Saltation threshold on Earth, Mars and Venus , 1982 .

[17]  S. Arya Air Pollution Meteorology and Dispersion , 1998 .

[18]  Nicholas Lancaster,et al.  Sediment flux and airflow on the stoss slope of a barchan dune , 1996 .

[19]  I C Edmundson,et al.  Particle size analysis , 2013 .

[20]  A. T. Harding,et al.  Probability and statistics for engineers , 1969 .

[21]  G. Enderlein,et al.  Miller, I., and J. E. Freund: Probability and Statistics for Engineers. Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 1965. 432 S., Preis 96. s. , 1968 .

[22]  H. Musick,et al.  Field evaluation of relationships between a vegetation structural parameter and sheltering against wind erosion , 1990 .

[23]  John L. Lumley,et al.  The structure of atmospheric turbulence , 1964 .

[24]  Weinan Chen,et al.  Particle production and aeolian transport from a “supply‐limited” source area in the Chihuahuan desert, New Mexico, United States , 2001 .

[25]  J. C. Kaimal,et al.  Atmospheric boundary layer flows , 1994 .

[26]  P. R. Owen,et al.  Saltation of uniform grains in air , 1964, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[27]  Ian J. Walker,et al.  Dynamics of secondary airflow and sediment transport over and in the lee of transverse dunes , 2002 .

[28]  M. Raupach,et al.  The effect of roughness elements on wind erosion threshold , 1993 .

[29]  T. L. Lyon,et al.  The Nature and Properties of Soils , 1930 .

[30]  D. Gillette,et al.  CAUSES OF THE FETCH EFFECT IN WIND EROSION , 1996 .

[31]  B. Marticorena,et al.  Modeling the atmospheric dust cycle: 1. Design of a soil-derived dust emission scheme , 1995 .

[32]  Kerry Emanuel,et al.  Tropical Meteorology , 2002 .

[33]  J. Finnigan,et al.  Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows: Their Structure and Measurement , 1994 .