The manufacturing of flat panel displays requires a number of photomasks for the placement of pixel patterns and supporting transistor arrays. For large area photomasks, dedicated ultra-precision writers have been developed for the production of these chromium patterns on glass or quartz plates. The dimensional tolerances in X and Y for absolute pattern placement on these plates, with areas measured in square meters, are in the range of 200–300 nm (3σ). To verify these photomasks, 2D ultra-precision coordinate measurement machines are used having even tighter tolerance requirements. This paper will present how the world standard metrology tool used for verifying large masks, the Micronic Mydata MMS15000, is calibrated without any other references than the wavelength of the interferometers in an extremely well-controlled temperature environment. This process is called self-calibration and is the only way to calibrate the metrology tool, as no square-meter-sized large area 2D traceable artifact is available. The only parameter that cannot be found using self-calibration is the absolute length scale. To make the MMS15000 traceable, a 1D reference rod, calibrated at a national metrology lab, is used. The reference plates used in the calibration of the MMS15000 may have sizes up to 1 m2 and a weight of 50 kg. Therefore, standard methods for self-calibration on a small scale with exact placements cannot be used in the large area case. A new, more general method had to be developed for the purpose of calibrating the MMS15000. Using this method, it is possible to calibrate the measurement tool down to an uncertainty level of <90 nm (3σ) over an area of (0.8 × 0.8) m2. The method used, which is based on the concept of iteration, does not introduce any more noise than the random noise introduced by the measurements, resulting in the lowest possible noise level that can be achieved by any self-calibration method.
[1]
Michael R. Raugh.
Error estimation for lattice methods of stage self-calibration
,
1997,
Advanced Lithography.
[2]
Michael R. Raugh,et al.
Statistical perspectives of self-calibration
,
1996,
Advanced Lithography.
[3]
Peter Ekberg,et al.
Ultra-precision geometrical measurement technique based on a statistical random phase clock combined with acoustic-optical deflection
,
2010
.
[4]
Lars Peter Ekberg.
Development of ultra-precision tools for metrology and lithography of large area photomasks and high definition displays
,
2013
.
[5]
Lars Mattsson,et al.
Z-correction, a method for achieving ultraprecise self-calibration on large area coordinate measurement machines for photomasks
,
2014
.
[6]
C. N. Berglund,et al.
An exact algorithm for self-calibration of two-dimensional precision metrology stages
,
1997
.
[7]
M. Stock.
Watt balance experiments for the determination of the Planck constant and the redefinition of the kilogram
,
2013
.
[8]
Peter Ekberg,et al.
A large-area ultra-precision 2D geometrical measurement technique based on statistical random phase detection
,
2012
.