Influence of prime-probe stimulus onset asynchrony and prime precuing manipulations on semantic priming effects with words in a lexical-decision task.

The present research examines semantic priming from attended and unattended parafoveal words. Participants made a lexical decision in response to a single central target. The target was preceded by two parafoveal prime words, with one of them (the attended prime) being precued by a peripheral cue. The main variables manipulated across experiments were cue informativeness (valid vs. neutral cues) and stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between prime and probe (200, 300, 600, or 1,000 ms). The results showed (a) reliable semantic priming from both attended and ignored prime words and (b) that the ignored priming effects were either negative or positive, depending on both the prime-probe SOA and cue informativeness. The present findings are discussed in relation to inhibitory versus episodic retrieval models of negative priming.

[1]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Negative priming depends on ease of selection , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Semantic Context Effects on Visual Word Processing: A Hybrid Prospective-Retrospective Processing Theory , 1989 .

[3]  Luis J. Fuentes,et al.  The Role of the Anterior Attention System in Semantic Processing of both Foveal and Parafoveal Words , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[5]  Donald E. Broadbent,et al.  The Processing of Non-target Words: Semantic or Not? , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  B. DeSchepper,et al.  An inhibition-based fan effect : Evidence for an active suppression mechanism in selective attention , 1992 .

[7]  E. Fox.  Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  W. Trammell Neill,et al.  Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. , 1997 .

[9]  A. Inhoff,et al.  Parafoveal word perception: a further case against semantic preprocessing. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  P. Tudela,et al.  Attentional orienting within visual field in a lexical decision task , 1998 .

[11]  Penny L. Yee,et al.  Semantic inhibition of Ignored Words during a Figure Classification Task , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[13]  E. Fox,et al.  Attentional bias in anxiety: A defective inhibition hypothesis , 1994 .

[14]  W. Neill,et al.  Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay? , 1992 .

[15]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  A E Seiffert,et al.  Selective attention: a reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. , 1998, Psychological review.

[17]  H. Egeth,et al.  Failure of spatial selectivity in vision , 1978 .

[18]  Cathleen M. Moore,et al.  Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict: Where has all the inhibition gone? , 1994 .

[19]  Daniel Holender,et al.  Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  S. Tipper.  The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  R. D. Gordon,et al.  Attentional components of partial report , 1997 .

[23]  Geoffrey Underwood,et al.  SEMANTIC INTERFERENCE FROM UNATTENDED PRINTED WORDS , 1976 .

[24]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Identification, localization, and “iconic memory”: An evaluation of the bar-probe task , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[25]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Cross-language positive priming disappears, negative priming does not: Evidence for two sources of selective inhibition , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Pío Tudela,et al.  Semantic Processing of Foveally and Parafoveally Presented Words in a Lexical Decision Task , 1992 .

[27]  A W Inhoff,et al.  Parafoveal word perception: A case against semantic preprocessing , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  W. Neill,et al.  Response conflict reverses priming: A replication , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Bruce Milliken,et al.  12. Distinguishing between inhibition-based and episodic retrieval-bases accounts of negative priming , 1996 .

[30]  P. Tudela,et al.  Positive and negative semantic priming of attended and unattended parafoveal words in a lexical decision task , 1996 .

[31]  A. Lambert,et al.  Selective Attention, Visual Laterality, Awareness, and Perceiving the Meaning of Parafoveally Presented Words , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  K R Paap,et al.  Parafoveal information is not sufficient to produce semantic or visual priming , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Negative priming is not task bound: A consistent pattern across naming and categorization tasks , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  Peter Dixon,et al.  Attention and interference in the perception of brief visual displays. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  S. Tipper,et al.  Negative priming between pictures and words in a selective attention task: Evidence for semantic processing of ignored stimuli , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[36]  P. L. Tenpenny,et al.  Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  G Underwood,et al.  Parafoveal Words are Effective in Both Hemifields: Preattentive Processing of Semantic and Phonological Codes , 1983, Perception.

[38]  Bruce Milliken,et al.  Negative priming in a spatial localization task: feature mismatching and distractor inhibition , 1994 .

[39]  W. Trammell Neill,et al.  Selective attention and the suppression of cognitive noise. , 1987 .

[40]  S P Tipper,et al.  Inhibitory mechanisms of attention in identification and localization tasks: time course and disruption. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  A. Longoni,et al.  Semantic processing of unattended parafoveal words. , 1991, Acta psychologica.

[42]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Determinants of Negative Priming , 1995 .

[43]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Dual mechanisms of negative priming , 1997 .

[44]  Timothy R. Jordan,et al.  Central Fixations are Inadequately Controlled by Instructions Alone: Implications for Studying Cerebral Asymmetry , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[45]  B. DeSchepper,et al.  Costs and benefits of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  S. Tipper.  Does Negative Priming Reflect Inhibitory Mechanisms? A Review and Integration of Conflicting Views , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[47]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Negative priming for spatial locations: identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition , 1994 .

[48]  M. Bryden,et al.  On the Relation between Visual Spatial Attention and Visual Field Asymmetries , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[49]  J. Henderson.  Spatial precues affect target discrimination in the absence of visual noise. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective Attention and Priming: Inhibitory and Facilitatory Effects of Ignored Primes , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[51]  Charles J. Brainerd,et al.  New perspectives on interference and inhibition in cognition: Final comments , 1995 .

[52]  J. J. Ortells,et al.  Facilitation and interference effects in a Stroop-like task: evidence in favor of semantic processing of parafoveally-presented stimuli. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[53]  A. Richards.  The Effects of Cueing Target Location and Response Mode on Interference and Negative Priming Using a Visual Selection Paradigm , 1999, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[54]  G. Logan,et al.  Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention , 1996 .

[55]  E. Fox.  Pre-cuing Target Location Reduces Interference but Not Negative Priming from Visual Distractors , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[56]  Steven P. Tipper,et al.  Individual differences in selective attention: The relation of priming and interference to cognitive failure , 1987 .

[57]  D. Lowe,et al.  Further investigations of inhibitory mechanisms in attention , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[58]  W. Neill,et al.  Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval , 1992 .

[59]  W. Neill,et al.  Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. , 1995 .