Hector, a new methodology for continuous and pattern-free heliostat field optimization

Abstract In the framework of central receiver solar plants, the heliostat field can take up to 50% of the initial investment and cause up to 40% of energy loss. The most popular design strategies are based on: (i) forcing heliostats to follow known distribution patterns and (ii) iterative selection of positions. However, these methods might produce suboptimal solutions. The evolution of computational platforms allows the development of more flexible approaches. In this work, Hector, a new meta-heuristic aimed at facilitating coordinate-based optimization, is presented. First, since East-West symmetry is imposed, one of those regions is ignored and the number of heliostats to be placed is halved. Second, the selected region is split into separate circular sectors around the receiver. Next, at every iteration, a new heliostat is added to the most promising sector. Then, it is optimized by a user-selected algorithm, as an independent problem, in a continuous search-space. This procedure is repeated until all the required heliostats have been deployed. The computed half is finally cloned into the other one. Two versions of this strategy are proposed. Our empirical results show that, for a given optimizer, better fields are obtained with Hector. The second version yields the best fields but requires more runtime.

[1]  Emilio Carrizosa,et al.  A heuristic method for simultaneous tower and pattern-free field optimization on solar power systems , 2015, Comput. Oper. Res..

[2]  Antonio L. Avila-Marin,et al.  Evaluation of the potential of central receiver solar power plants: Configuration, optimization and trends , 2013 .

[3]  F. Ramos,et al.  Heliostat blocking and shadowing efficiency in the video-game era , 2014, ArXiv.

[4]  Yingxue Yao,et al.  Heliostat field layout methodology in central receiver systems based on efficiency-related distribution , 2015 .

[5]  Ikjin Lee,et al.  Development of performance analysis model for central receiver system and its application to pattern-free heliostat layout optimization , 2017 .

[6]  Mohamed Gadalla,et al.  Thermo-economic and comparative analyses of two recently proposed optimization approaches for circular heliostat fields: Campo radial-staggered and biomimetic spiral , 2016 .

[7]  Zhifeng Wang,et al.  Modeling and simulation of the pioneer 1 MW solar thermal central receiver system in China , 2009 .

[8]  Bernhard Hoffschmidt,et al.  Advances in solar tower technology , 2017 .

[9]  José Domingo Álvarez,et al.  Design of a parallel genetic algorithm for continuous and pattern-free heliostat field optimization , 2018, The Journal of Supercomputing.

[10]  F. W. Lipps Theory of cellwise optimization for solar central receiver systems , 1985 .

[11]  F. W. Lipps,et al.  A cellwise method for the optimization of large central receiver systems , 1978 .

[12]  Manuel Torrilhon,et al.  Heliostat field optimization: A new computationally efficient model and biomimetic layout , 2012 .

[13]  Nicolas Bayer Botero,et al.  Heliostat field layout optimization for high-temperature solar thermochemical processing , 2011 .

[14]  Manuel Romero,et al.  Methodology for generation of heliostat field layout in central receiver systems based on yearly normalized energy surfaces , 2006 .

[15]  Nathan P. Siegel,et al.  Performance modeling and techno-economic analysis of a modular concentrated solar power tower with latent heat storage , 2018 .

[16]  S. L. Lutchman,et al.  Heliostat field layout optimization for a central receiver , 2014 .

[17]  Yuhong Zhao,et al.  Heliostat Field Layout Design for Solar Tower Power Plant Based on GPU , 2014 .

[18]  F.M.F Siala,et al.  Mathematical formulation of a graphical method for a no-blocking heliostat field layout , 2001 .

[19]  Reiner Buck Heliostat Field Layout Using Non-Restricted Optimization , 2012 .

[20]  Fermín Mallor,et al.  Comparison of Heliostat Field Layout Design Methodologies and Impact on Power Plant Efficiency , 2015 .

[21]  José Domingo Álvarez,et al.  Review of software for optical analyzing and optimizing heliostat fields , 2017 .

[22]  Reiner Buck,et al.  Heliostat Field Layout Improvement by Nonrestricted Refinement , 2014 .

[23]  Alexandra M. Newman,et al.  Optimized dispatch in a first-principles concentrating solar power production model , 2017 .

[24]  K R Williams,et al.  Power from the sun , 1979 .

[25]  A. Ramos,et al.  Strategies in tower solar power plant optimization , 2012 .

[26]  Sad Salhi,et al.  Heuristic Search: The Emerging Science of Problem Solving , 2017 .

[27]  D. Yogi Goswami,et al.  A computationally efficient method for the design of the heliostat field for solar power tower plant , 2014 .

[28]  Emilio Carrizosa,et al.  An optimization tool to design the field of a solar power tower plant allowing heliostats of different sizes , 2017 .

[29]  Sebastian-James Bode,et al.  On Using a Gradient-based Method for Heliostat Field Layout Optimization , 2014 .

[30]  Chang Liu,et al.  Thermal performance and cost analysis of a multi-layered solid-PCM thermocline thermal energy storage for CSP tower plants , 2016 .

[31]  Erika Ábrahám,et al.  Heliostat Field Layout Optimization with Evolutionary Algorithms , 2016, GCAI.

[32]  Francisco J. Collado,et al.  Campo: Generation of regular heliostat fields , 2012 .

[33]  Francisco J. Collado,et al.  A review of optimized design layouts for solar power tower plants with campo code , 2013 .

[34]  Lijun Yang,et al.  An efficient code to optimize the heliostat field and comparisons between the biomimetic spiral and staggered layout , 2016 .