So many ties, so little time: A task contingency perspective on corporate social capital in organizations

We develop the argument that organization network structures that yield positive social capital in some task situations convey social liability in other situations. Using the distinction between exploration and exploitation tasks among teams, we show that the network position that conveyed positive social capital for teams engaged in exploration tasks was a social liability for teams pursuing exploitation tasks. Results of an analysis of 67 new product development teams showed that exploratory teams completed their projects more quickly if they had a social network structure composed of many strong external ties that were non-redundant. In contrast, teams pursuing tasks that exploited existing expertise took longer to complete if they had this type of social network structure, mainly because external ties had to be maintained but were not much needed for the task. We propose that organization network theories of tie strength and structural holes need to be broadened to reflect the effects of task differences, network costs, and difficulties in getting others to help.

[1]  K. Deutsch,et al.  Nationalism and Social Communication , 1954 .

[2]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[3]  A. Portes.  Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[4]  Donald F. Roy.  Quota Restriction and Goldbricking in a Machine Shop , 1952, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm , 1996 .

[6]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[7]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[8]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[9]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[10]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Relationships and Unethical Behavior: A Social Network Perspective , 1998 .

[11]  F. J. Roethlisberger,et al.  Management and the Worker , 1941 .

[12]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly , 2009 .

[13]  H. Blossfeld.  Techniques of event history modeling , 1989 .

[14]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Whether close or far: Social distance effects on perceived balance in friendship networks , 1999 .

[15]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[16]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Social Capital and Opportunity in Corporate R&D: The Contingent Effect of Contact Density on Mobility Expectations , 1998 .

[17]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation , 1996 .

[18]  M. Tushman.  Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[19]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[20]  I. Nonaka.  Redundant, Overlapping Organization: A Japanese Approach to Managing the Innovation Process , 1990 .

[21]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[22]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Power, Social Influence, and Sense Making: Effects of Network Centrality and Proximity on Employee Perceptions. , 1993 .

[23]  F. J. Roethlisberger,et al.  Management and the Worker , 2003 .

[24]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[25]  M. E. Shaw.  Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[26]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[27]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[28]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[29]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[30]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[31]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[32]  B. Kogut,et al.  Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network , 1997 .

[33]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[34]  Daniel J. Brass.  Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. , 1984 .

[35]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[36]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[37]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[38]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[39]  A. Portes,et al.  Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  S. Seashore.  Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group , 1955 .

[41]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[42]  M. Hannan,et al.  Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. , 1986 .

[43]  P. Ekeh,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions. , 1975 .

[44]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[45]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[46]  R. Leenders,et al.  CSC: The Structure of Advantage and Disadvantage , 1999 .

[47]  R. Burt.  The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[48]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. , 1995 .

[49]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[50]  G. Homans.  The human group , 1952 .

[51]  Monica C. Higgins.  Changing careers: the effects of social context , 2001 .

[52]  Alberto Leon-Garcia,et al.  Communication Networks , 2000 .

[53]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  Carrie R. Leana,et al.  Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices , 1999 .

[55]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.