Treating Non-conforming Sensitivity Fields by Mortar Mapping and Vertex Morphing for Multi-disciplinary Shape Optimization

This study investigates the sensitivity filtering properties of the Mortar Mapping method and correlates it to the Vertex Morphing method in order to demonstrate the advantages of such a procedure in the context of shape optimization. It points out the importance of a common design control approach in a Multi-Disciplinary Optimization (MDO) environment. In particular, individual components of MDO have nonmatching interfaces when Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) problems are of interest. Since the numerical models of dissimilar discretizations deliver nonconforming sensitivity fields with respect to the design variables defined at their interfaces, the shape optimization of the common surfaces necessitates a third field which unifies the optimization variables and acts as a control field. This approach not only covers this necessity by facilitating the Mortar Mapping method but also reveals that such a procedure acts as a sensitivity filter similar to the Vertex Morphing method without altering the optimality of the solution.

[1]  K. Giannakoglou,et al.  Continuous Adjoint Methods for Turbulent Flows, Applied to Shape and Topology Optimization: Industrial Applications , 2016 .

[2]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Extensions to the design structure matrix for the description of multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization processes , 2012, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[3]  Daniel Baumgärtner,et al.  Towards shape optimization of steady-state fluid-structure interaction problems using vertex morphing , 2015 .

[4]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  Assessment and improvement of mapping algorithms for non-matching meshes and geometries in computational FSI , 2016 .

[5]  Kai-Uwe Bletzinger,et al.  A consistent frame for sensitivity filtering and the vertex assigned morphing of optimal shape , 2014, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[6]  Ravindra B. Bapat,et al.  Linear algebra and linear models , 2000 .

[7]  Kai-Uwe Bletzinger,et al.  The Vertex Morphing method for node-based shape optimization , 2014 .

[8]  Bruce M. Irons,et al.  A version of the Aitken accelerator for computer iteration , 1969 .

[9]  J. Alonso,et al.  Complete Configuration Aero-Structural Optimization Using a Coupled Sensitivity Analysis Method , 2002 .

[10]  P. Tallec,et al.  Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: Momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity , 1998 .

[11]  Barbara Wohlmuth Discretization Techniques Based on Domain Decomposition , 2001 .

[12]  C. Othmer A continuous adjoint formulation for the computation of topological and surface sensitivities of ducted flows , 2008 .

[13]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization: A survey of architectures , 2013 .

[14]  Antonio Fazzolari,et al.  An Aero-Structure Adjoint Formulation for Efficient Multidisciplinary Wing Optimization , 2005 .