World development report 2017 : rent creation and rent containment - the political economy of telecommunications in Mexico, South Africa, and Turkey

The evolution of the telecommunications sector is of keen interest from both a development and a political economy perspective. Telecommunications is critical to economic dynamics, to the quality of life, to social service provision, and to citizen engagement. This paper explores the political economy of telecommunications in three middle income countries - Mexico, South Africa, and Turkey. It undertakes an interpretation of the processes at work through the lens of these comparative cases. It is also intended as a case study of a set of broader questions over the development process, as this is shaped by the central nexus of relations between business and state actors. The paper is specifically concerned with the following questions: how does policy change in real polities, in terms of both policy design and implementation?; how is this shaped by the underlying nature of business-state relations, and to the overall political settlement in a country?; is there a tendency for economic entrenchment in typical middle income countries?; by this the authors mean consolidation of economic activities in ways that support sustained economic rents, underpinned by various mixes of regulatory capture and market power. And what countervailing forces are there to support a more dynamic and competitive equilibrium?; how is the state understood in the context of these business-state relations?; how is it useful to deconstruct the state, and in particular, do checks and balances institutions have the autonomy to provide a check on entrenchment?; and how do these processes interact with technological change? These questions relate to the broader issue of whether governance arrangements can countervail unequal political and economic power in ways that foster inclusive development.

[1]  Emin Köksal,et al.  Reviewing Regulatory Policy for Broadband in Turkey , 2015 .

[2]  I. Vogelsang The Endgame of Telecommunications Policy? A Survey , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  Izak Atiyas,et al.  Regulation and competition in the Turkish telecommunications industry: an update , 2010 .

[4]  Ingo Vogelsang,et al.  The relationship between mobile and fixed-line communications: A survey , 2010, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[5]  Izak Atiyas Recent privatization experience of Turkey: a reappraisal , 2009 .

[6]  Andrea Renda,et al.  EU-Turkey Accession Negotiations: Impact assessment of Chapter 10 on information society and media. CEPS Special Report, 3 July 2009 , 2009 .

[7]  Izak Atiyas,et al.  Glass half empty? politics and institutions in the liberalization of the fixed line telecommunications industry in Turkey , 2009 .

[8]  Robert B. Horwitz,et al.  Another instance where privatization trumped liberalization: The politics of telecommunications reform in South Africa-A ten-year retrospective , 2007 .

[9]  Izak Atiyas,et al.  When good intentions are not enough: Sequential entry and competition in the Turkish mobile industry , 2007 .

[10]  R. Noll PRIORITIES FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS REFORM IN MEXICO , 2007 .

[11]  Marco Manacorda,et al.  Telecommunications Performance, Reforms, and Governance , 2006 .

[12]  Alison Gillwald,et al.  Good intentions, poor outcomes: Telecommunications reform in South Africa , 2005 .

[13]  S. Haber Mexico’s experiments with bank privatization and liberalization, 1991–2003 , 2005 .

[14]  Adam L. Resnick The Politics of Property Rights: Political Instability, Credible Commitments, and Economic Growth in Mexico, 1876–1929 , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[15]  A. Tornell,et al.  The Political Economy of Mexico's Entry to NAFTA , 1995 .

[16]  Mauro Flórez Calderón,et al.  El mercado de la telefonía celular , 1993, Ingeniería e Investigación.

[17]  D. Rodrik Promises, Promises: Credible Policy Reform Via Signaling , 1988 .

[18]  Lena Jaeger,et al.  Regulations Institutions And Commitment Comparative Studies Of Telecommunications , 2016 .

[19]  M. Walton,et al.  No Growth without Equity? Inequality, Interests, and Competition in Mexico , 2009 .

[20]  M. Walton,et al.  The Inequality Trap and its Links to Low Growth in Mexico 1 , 2006 .