Preparatory object rotation as a human-inspired grasping strategy

Humans exhibit a rich set of manipulation strategies that may be desirable to mimic in humanoid robots. This study investigates preparatory object rotation as a manipulation strategy for grasping objects from different presented orientations. First, we examine how humans use preparatory rotation as a grasping strategy for lifting heavy objects with handles. We used motion capture to record human manipulation examples of 10 participants grasping objects under different task constraints. When sliding contact of the object on the surface was permitted, participants used preparatory rotation to first adjust the object handle to a desired orientation before grasping to lift the object from the surface. Analysis of the human examples suggests that humans may use preparatory object rotation in order to reuse a particular type of grasp in a specific capture region or to decrease the joint torques required to maintain the lifting pose. Second, we designed a preparatory rotation strategy for an anthropomorphic robot manipulator as a method of extending the capture region of a specific grasp prototype. The strategy was implemented as a sequence of two open-loop actions mimicking the human motion: a preparatory rotation action followed by a grasping action. The grasping action alone can only successfully lift the object from a 45-degree region of initial orientations (4 of 24 tested conditions). Our empirical evaluation of the robot preparatory rotation shows that even using a simple open-loop rotation action enables the reuse of the grasping action for a 360-degree capture region of initial object orientations (24 of 24 tested conditions).

[1]  Héctor H. González-Baños,et al.  Multi-modal Motion Planning for a Humanoid Robot Manipulation Task , 2007, ISRR.

[2]  James J. Kuffner,et al.  Navigation among movable obstacles: real-time reasoning in complex environments , 2004, 4th IEEE/RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2004..

[3]  Lambertus J.M. Mulder,et al.  ATTENTION AND PERFORMANCE XIV , 1993 .

[4]  David A Rosenbaum,et al.  A Method for Obtaining Psychophysical Estimates of Movement Costs , 2008, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Automatic Synthesis of Fine-Motion Strategies for Robots , 1984 .

[6]  G. Molenberghs,et al.  Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data , 2001 .

[7]  George E Stelmach,et al.  Effect of Orienting the Finger Opposition Space in the Control of Reach-to-Grasp Movements , 2005, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  Kevin M. Lynch,et al.  Controllability of pushing , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Matthew T. Mason,et al.  Mechanics and Planning of Manipulator Pushing Operations , 1986 .

[10]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Planning for manual positioning: the end-state comfort effect for manual abduction–adduction , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  Lillian Y. Chang,et al.  On preparatory object rotation to adjust handle orientation for grasping , 2008 .

[12]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  A robotics toolbox for MATLAB , 1996, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[13]  Victor Ng-Thow-Hing,et al.  Expanding task functionality in established humanoid robots , 2007, 2007 7th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[14]  C. E. Clauser,et al.  Weight, volume, and center of mass of segments of the human body , 1969 .

[15]  David E. Meyer,et al.  Attention and performance XIV (silver jubilee volume): synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience , 1993 .

[16]  M. Short,et al.  Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control: end-state comfort and point-of-change effects. , 1997, Acta psychologica.