The Impact of Geographic Distance on Online Social Interactions

Online social networking services entice millions of users to spend hours every day interacting with each other. The focus of this work is to explain the effect that geographic distance has on online social interactions and, simultaneously, to understand the interplay between the social characteristics of friendship ties and their spatial properties. We analyze data from a large-scale online social network, Tuenti, with about 10 million active users: our sample includes user profiles, user home locations and online social interactions among Tuenti members. Our findings support the idea that spatial distance constraints whom users interact with, but not the intensity of their social interactions. Furthermore, friendship ties belonging to denser connected groups tend to arise at shorter spatial distances than social ties established between members belonging to different groups. Finally, we show that our findings mostly do not depend on the age of the users, although younger users seem to be slightly more constrained to shorter geographic distances. Augmenting social structure with geographic information adds a new dimension to social network analysis and a large number of theoretical investigations and practical applications can be pursued for online social systems, with many promising outcomes. As the amount of available location-based data is increasing, our findings and results open the door to future possibilities: researchers would benefit from these insights when studying online social services, while developers should be aware of these additional possibilities when building systems and applications related to online social platforms.

[1]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Whether close or far: Social distance effects on perceived balance in friendship networks , 1999 .

[2]  Henry A. Kautz,et al.  Finding your friends and following them to where you are , 2012, WSDM '12.

[3]  Etienne Huens,et al.  Geographical dispersal of mobile communication networks , 2008, 0802.2178.

[4]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Predicting tie strength with social media , 2009, CHI.

[5]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Structure and evolution of online social networks , 2006, KDD '06.

[6]  Karolin Kappler,et al.  Gender homophily in online dyadic and triadic relationships , 2016, EPJ Data Science.

[7]  Derek Ruths,et al.  Geolocation Prediction in Twitter Using Social Networks: A Critical Analysis and Review of Current Practice , 2015, ICWSM.

[8]  Ben Y. Zhao,et al.  User interactions in social networks and their implications , 2009, EuroSys '09.

[9]  Marc Barthelemy,et al.  Spatial Networks , 2010, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[10]  Dorota Kupiszewska,et al.  Internal Migration and Development: Comparing Migration Intensities Around the World , 2015 .

[11]  Ben Y. Zhao,et al.  Understanding latent interactions in online social networks , 2013, TWEB.

[12]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  The Geospatial Characteristics of a Social Movement Communication Network , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.

[14]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Towards a model of understanding social search , 2008, SSM '08.

[15]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  The Length of Bridge Ties: Structural and Geographic Properties of Online Social Interactions , 2012, ICWSM.

[16]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  Distance Matters: Geo-social Metrics for Online Social Networks , 2010, WOSN.

[17]  Yana Volkovich,et al.  Comparative analysis of articulated and behavioural social networks in a social news sharing website , 2011, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..

[18]  Raquel Recuero,et al.  Taking tweets to the streets: A spatial analysis of the Vinegar Protests in Brazil , 2014, First Monday.

[19]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[20]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  A test of structural features of granovetter's strength of weak ties theory , 1980 .

[21]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[22]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  Far from the eyes, close on the web: impact of geographic distance on online social interactions , 2012, WOSN '12.

[23]  Rizal Setya Perdana What is Twitter , 2013 .

[24]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Tweets from Justin Bieber's heart: the dynamics of the location field in user profiles , 2011, CHI.

[25]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Distance Is Not Dead: Social Interaction and Geographical Distance in the Internet Era , 2009, ArXiv.

[26]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The role of social networks in information diffusion , 2012, WWW.

[27]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Navigation in a small world , 2000, Nature.

[28]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Risky Social Networking Practices Among "Underage" Users: Lessons for Evidence-Based Policy , 2013, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[29]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measurement and analysis of online social networks , 2007, IMC '07.

[30]  Renaud Lambiotte,et al.  Predicting links in ego-networks using temporal information , 2015, EPJ Data Science.

[31]  Jukka-Pekka Onnela,et al.  Geographic Constraints on Social Network Groups , 2010, PloS one.

[32]  A. Arvidsson,et al.  Echo Chamber or Public Sphere? Predicting Political Orientation and Measuring Political Homophily in Twitter Using Big Data , 2014 .

[33]  K. Dindia,et al.  Definitions and Theoretical Perspectives on Maintaining Relationships , 1993 .

[34]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[35]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort: an Introduction to Human Ecology , 2012 .

[36]  David Mazières,et al.  RE: Reliable Email , 2006, NSDI.

[37]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network , 2008, WWW.

[38]  M. Castells The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance , 2008 .

[39]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  Socio-Spatial Properties of Online Location-Based Social Networks , 2011, ICWSM.

[40]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  The Structure and Dynamics of Networks: (Princeton Studies in Complexity) , 2006 .

[41]  Robin I. M. Dunbar Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language , 1996 .

[42]  W. Tobler A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .

[43]  Carter T. Butts,et al.  The Persistence of Division , 2016 .

[44]  Damon Horowitz,et al.  The anatomy of a large-scale social search engine , 2010, WWW '10.

[45]  Lars Backstrom,et al.  Find me if you can: improving geographical prediction with social and spatial proximity , 2010, WWW '10.

[46]  Cecilia Mascolo The Power of Mobile Computing in a Social Era , 2010, IEEE Internet Computing.

[47]  Vijay Erramilli,et al.  TailGate: handling long-tail content with a little help from friends , 2012, WWW.

[48]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of Networks , 2009 .

[49]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  A social network caught in the Web , 2003, First Monday.

[50]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  Kalina Bontcheva,et al.  Where's @wally?: a classification approach to geolocating users based on their social ties , 2013, HT.

[52]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  Track globally, deliver locally: improving content delivery networks by tracking geographic social cascades , 2011, WWW.

[53]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[54]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Structural and Dynamical Patterns on Online Social Networks: The Spanish May 15th Movement as a Case Study , 2011, PloS one.

[55]  B. Wellman,et al.  Does Distance Matter in the Age of the Internet? , 2008 .

[56]  Renaud Lambiotte,et al.  Uncovering space-independent communities in spatial networks , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Jasmine Novak,et al.  Geographic routing in social networks , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[58]  Seungyeop Han,et al.  Analysis of topological characteristics of huge online social networking services , 2007, WWW '07.

[59]  Esteban Moro Egido,et al.  The dynamical strength of social ties in information spreading , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[60]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Weaving a Web of Trust , 2008, Science.

[61]  James Caverlee,et al.  Location prediction in social media based on tie strength , 2013, CIKM.

[62]  J. Sempsey The death of distance: How the communications revolution will change our lives , 1998 .

[63]  Lars Backstrom,et al.  The Anatomy of the Facebook Social Graph , 2011, ArXiv.

[64]  Frances Cairncross The death of distance : how the communications revolution will change our lives , 1997 .