Correlation between mechanical properties and stabilization time of chemical bonds in glass-ionomer cements.

The objective was to evaluate the compressive strength (CS), diametral tensile strength (DTS), flexural strength (FS), and Knoop microhardness (KH) of different conventional restorative glass-ionomer cements (GICs) and to correlate these mechanical properties (MP) with the stabilization time (ST) of their chemical bonds. Eighteen GICs were tested: Bioglass [B], Chemfil Rock [CR], Equia Forte [EF], Gold Label 2 [GL2], Gold Label 9 [GL9], Glass Ionomer Cement II [GI], Ionglass [IG], Ion Z[ IZ], Ionomaster [IM], Ionofil Plus [IP], Ionostar Plus [IS], Ketac Molar Easymix [KM], Magic Glass [MG], Maxxion R [Ma], Riva Self Cure [R], Vidrion R [V], Vitro Fil [VF] and Vitro Molar [VM]. The mechanical strength tests were performed in a universal testing machine. KH readings were done with a diamond indenter. STs were examined by Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey test (p<0.05). The Spearman rank test was used to evaluate the dependence between the MPs and ST results. The highest MP values were EF, GL2, GL9, GI and KM and the lowest for MG, MA, B, VF and IM. The longest ST was for GL2 and the shortest was for B. ST correlated positively with MP. GICs with longer chemical bonds ST are generally stronger and the ST value obtained from FTIR was useful in predicting the strength of GICs tested.

[1]  Ana Flávia Sanches Borges,et al.  Mechanical and optical properties of conventional restorative glass-ionomer cements - a systematic review , 2019, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[2]  M. Baesso,et al.  Study of the chemical interaction between a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement and dentin , 2018, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[3]  S. Leal,et al.  Glass hybrid restorations as an alternative for restoring hypomineralized molars in the ART model , 2018, BMC Oral Health.

[4]  J. Nicholson Maturation processes in glass-ionomer dental cements , 2018, Acta biomaterialia odontologica Scandinavica.

[5]  E. Ergin,et al.  Clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system: a 6-year evaluation , 2016, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[6]  S. Mickenautsch High-viscosity glass-ionomer cements for direct posterior tooth restorations in permanent teeth: The evidence in brief. , 2016, Journal of dentistry.

[7]  L. S. Türkün,et al.  A Prospective Six-Year Clinical Study Evaluating Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cements with Resin Coating on Posterior Teeth: Quo Vadis? , 2016, Operative dentistry.

[8]  J. Nicholson,et al.  A Review of Glass-Ionomer Cements for Clinical Dentistry , 2016, Journal of functional biomaterials.

[9]  G. Fleming,et al.  Conventional glass-ionomer materials: A review of the developments in glass powder, polyacid liquid and the strategies of reinforcement. , 2015, Journal of dentistry.

[10]  N. Creugers,et al.  Is high-viscosity glass-ionomer-cement a successor to amalgam for treating primary molars? , 2014, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[11]  O. Addison,et al.  Improving the standard of the standard for glass ionomers: an alternative to the compressive fracture strength test for consideration? , 2012, Journal of dentistry.

[12]  P. Larkin Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy: Principles and Spectral Interpretation , 2011 .

[13]  A. H. Dowling,et al.  Is encapsulation of posterior glass-ionomer restoratives the solution to clinically induced variability introduced on mixing? , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  R. Hickel,et al.  Mechanical behavior of glass ionomer cements as a function of loading condition and mixing procedure. , 2007, Dental materials journal.

[15]  Linda Wang,et al.  Mechanical properties of dental restorative materials: relative contribution of laboratory tests. , 2003, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[16]  J. McCabe,et al.  Effect of mixing methods on the compressive strength of glass ionomer cements. , 2001, Journal of dentistry.

[17]  G. Wang,et al.  Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. , 2000, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[18]  R Guggenberger,et al.  New trends in glass-ionomer chemistry. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[19]  J. Nicholson,et al.  Chemistry of glass-ionomer cements: a review. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[20]  J. Meyer,et al.  Early strength of glass ionomer cements. , 1993, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[21]  R. Kerby,et al.  Physical Properties of Stainless-steel and Silver-reinforced Glass-ionomer Cements , 1991, Journal of dental research.

[22]  H. J. Prosser,et al.  Characterization of glass-ionomer cements. 7. The physical properties of current materials. , 1984, E -journal of dentistry.

[23]  A. D. Wilson,et al.  Characterization of glass-ionomer cements. 4. Effect of molecular weight on physical properties. , 1977, Journal of dentistry.

[24]  Alan D. Wilson,et al.  Characterization of glass-ionomer cements , 1976 .

[25]  F. A. Peyton,et al.  The Microhardness of Enamel and Dentin , 1958 .