Physiological factors contributing to the variability of sensory assessments: Relationship between salivary flow rate and temporal perception of gustatory stimuli☆

Abstract Stimulation by oral manipulation or ingestion of stimuli causes the salivary flow rate to increase. Not only do gustatory stimuli affect salivary response, but saliva in turn can affect perception of taste by titration, dilution, or precipitation of stimuli. Average bitterness and astringency time-intensity (TI) curves and individual TI parameters generated in response to wines varying in ethanol, pH and phenolic composition revealed differences in temporal perception among the salivary flow groups. For both attributes, low-flow (LF) subjects took a longer time to reach maximum intensity and had a longer duration than high-flow (HF) subjects. For wines with tannic acid at pH 3·0 and pH 3·6, LF subjects recorded a higher intensity at maximum of bitterness and astringency than HF subjects. This perceptual difference was more pronounced at pH 3·6, where a greater difference in salivary flow rate was also elicited between flow groups. The log intensity decay curves for bitterness and astringency were linear, suggesting that a first-order decay process governed the perception function. Desorption is thus considered to be the primary phenomenon, rather than diffusion through a boundary layer. For all flow groups, the decay constants for bitterness were higher than those for astringency. However, the decay constants within one modality were similar for all flow groups, indicating similar desorption rates. Reciprocal plots of salivary flow rate were linear, suggesting that a second-order process governed salivary flow.

[1]  B. Baum,et al.  Neurotransmitter Control of Secretion , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[2]  C. Dawes,et al.  The effects of different stimuli on the composition of saliva in man , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  P. Pelosi,et al.  Odorant-binding proteins. , 1994, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[4]  J. Brand,et al.  Salivary changes in solution pH: A source of individual differences in sour taste perception , 1987, Physiology & Behavior.

[5]  L. Bartoshuk The biological basis of food perception and acceptance , 1993 .

[6]  C. Dawes Stimulus effects on protein and electrolyte concentrations in parotid saliva. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  R. Axel,et al.  A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition , 1991, Cell.

[8]  H. Schmale,et al.  Possible role for salivary gland protein in taste reception indicated by homology to lipophilic-ligand carrier proteins , 1990, Nature.

[9]  Stanley D. Espinda Color Vision Deficiency , 1973 .

[10]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  Bitter taste of saccharin related to the genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil. , 1979, Science.

[11]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  Capsaicin desensitization and recovery on the human tongue , 1991, Physiology & Behavior.

[12]  Linda M. Bartoshuk,et al.  Sweetness of sucrose, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone, and saccharin is related to genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil , 1983 .

[13]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Bitterness of KCl and benzoate: Related to genetic status for sensitivity to PTC/PROP. , 1988 .

[14]  E. Benedek-Spät The composition of stimulated human parotid saliva. , 1973, Archives of oral biology.

[15]  Howard H. Chauncey,et al.  Human Parotid Gland Secretion , 1958, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[16]  P. Overbosch,et al.  A theoretical model for perceived intensity in human taste and smell as a function of time , 1986 .

[17]  W. K. Elwood The Effect of Manganese Chloride on Amelogenesis , 1962 .

[18]  M Feinleib,et al.  Olfactory sensitivity in humans: genetic versus environmental control. , 1980, Science.

[19]  R. Bradley,et al.  Secretions of von Ebner's glands influence responses from taste buds in rat circumvallate papilla , 1988 .

[20]  D. M. Carlson,et al.  Induction of proline-rich glycoprotein synthesis in mouse salivary glands by isoproterenol and by tannins. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[21]  H. Chauncey,et al.  Modified Carlson-Crittenden Device for the Collection of Parotid Fluid , 1962, Journal of dental research.

[22]  D. M. Carlson,et al.  Modulation of proline-rich protein biosynthesis in rat parotid glands by sorghums with high tannin levels. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  H. Schifferstein,et al.  The perception of the taste of KCl, NaCl and quinineHCl is not related to PROP-sensitivity , 1991 .

[24]  M. O'Mahony Salt Taste Adaptation: The Psychophysical Effects of Adapting Solutions and Residual Stimuli from Prior Tastings on the Taste of Sodium Chloride , 1979, Perception.

[25]  R. Pangborn,et al.  COMPARISON OF TIME‐INTENSITY WITH CATEGORY SCALING OF BITTERNESS OF ISO‐α‐ACIDS IN MODEL SYSTEMS AND IN BEER* , 1983 .

[26]  R. H. Anholt Odor recognition and olfactory transduction : the new frontier , 1991 .

[27]  M. Meilgaard Testing for Sensory Threshold of Added Substances , 1991 .

[28]  J. Pangborn,et al.  Simplified Sialometer for Continuous Weight Monitoring of Salivary Secretion , 1971, Journal of dental research.

[29]  L. Bartoshuk Sweetness : history, preference, and genetic variability , 1991 .

[30]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  The psychophysics of taste. , 1978, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[31]  C. Dawes The composition of human saliva secreted in response to a gustatory stimulus and to pilocarpine , 1966 .

[32]  A. C. Noble,et al.  Human saliva and taste responses to acids varying in anions, titratable acidity, and pH , 1984, Physiology & Behavior.

[33]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  PTC taste blindness and the taste of caffeine , 1975, Nature.

[34]  C. Christensen 1 – Importance of Saliva in Diet—Taste Relationships , 1986 .

[35]  P. Overbosch,et al.  An improved method for measuring perceived intensity/time relationships in human taste and smell , 1986 .

[36]  H. Bartsch,et al.  Inhibitory effect of betel nut extracts on endogenous nitrosation in humans. , 1983, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[37]  L. Butler,et al.  The specificity of proanthocyanidin-protein interactions. , 1981, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[38]  I. J. Miller,et al.  Variations in human taste bud density and taste intensity perception , 1990, Physiology & Behavior.

[39]  A. Noble,et al.  Comparison of Temporal Perception of Fruitiness in Model Systems Sweetened with Aspartame, an Aspartame + Acesulfame K Blend, or Sucrose , 1991 .

[40]  S. Snyder,et al.  Odorant-binding protein. Characterization of ligand binding. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[41]  S. Snyder,et al.  Molecular cloning of odorant-binding protein: member of a ligand carrier family. , 1988, Science.

[42]  A. Spielman,et al.  Interaction of Saliva and Taste , 1990, Journal of dental research.

[43]  Rose Marie Pangborn,et al.  The effect of oral stimulation on human parotid salivary flow rate and alpha-amylase secretion , 1987, Physiology & Behavior.

[44]  John E. Amoore,et al.  SPECIFIC ANOSMIA AND THE CONCEPT OF PRIMARY ODORS , 1977 .