Vertical gaze angle: absolute height-in-scene information for the programming of prehension

Abstract. One possible source of information regarding the distance of a fixated target is provided by the height of the object within the visual scene. It is accepted that this cue can provide ordinal information, but generally it has been assumed that the nervous system cannot extract "absolute" information from height-in-scene. In order to use height-in-scene, the nervous system would need to be sensitive to ocular position with respect to the head and to head orientation with respect to the shoulders (i.e. vertical gaze angle or VGA). We used a perturbation technique to establish whether the nervous system uses vertical gaze angle as a distance cue. Vertical gaze angle was perturbed using ophthalmic prisms with the base oriented either up or down. In experiment 1, participants were required to carry out an open-loop pointing task whilst wearing: (1) no prisms; (2) a base-up prism; or (3) a base-down prism. In experiment 2, the participants reached to grasp an object under closed-loop viewing conditions whilst wearing: (1) no prisms; (2) a base-up prism; or (3) a base-down prism. Experiment 1 and 2 provided clear evidence that the human nervous system uses vertical gaze angle as a distance cue. It was found that the weighting attached to VGA decreased with increasing target distance. The weighting attached to VGA was also affected by the discrepancy between the height of the target, as specified by all other distance cues, and the height indicated by the initial estimate of the position of the supporting surface. We conclude by considering the use of height-in-scene information in the perception of surface slant and highlight some of the complexities that must be involved in the computation of environmental layout.

[1]  H. Sedgwick.  The visible horizon: A potential source of visual information for the perception of size and distance. , 1973 .

[2]  J. E. W. Mayhew,et al.  A computational model of binocular depth perception , 1982, Nature.

[3]  A Berthoz,et al.  Adaptive mechanisms in eye-head coordination. , 1985, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[4]  W. Warren,et al.  Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  D. Massaro.  Ambiguity in perception and experimentation. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  M. Jeannerod.  The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[7]  Dominic W. Massaro.  Ambiguity in perception and experimentation. , 1988 .

[8]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  A Statistical Framework for Robust Fusion of Depth Information , 1989, Other Conferences.

[9]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Chapter 3 – Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth* , 1995 .

[10]  M. Landy,et al.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion , 1995, Vision Research.

[11]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Relative Size Perception at a Distance is Best at Eye Level , 1997 .

[12]  Martin S. Banks,et al.  Extra-retinal and perspective cues cause the small range of the induced effect , 1998, Vision Research.

[13]  M. A. Goodale,et al.  The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  M. Wraga.  Using eye height in different postures to scale the heights of objects. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  M. Wraga,et al.  The role of eye height in perceiving affordances and object dimensions , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Getting the measure of vergence weight in nearness perception , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  Monocular and binocular distance cues: insights from visual form agnosia I (of III) , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.