Technologies of Status Negotiation: Status Dynamics in Email Discussion Groups

This chapter considers the social structuring processes that occur in groups that use computer medicated communication (CMC). We propose several mechanisms through which status is created, negotiated, and managed in such groups. This chapter builds on earlier model of status dynamics in face-to-face groups (Owens, 1998; Owens & Sutton, 1999) to develop a series of propositions about how the differences between face-to-face and computer-mediated communication affect how group members attempt to manage their status. We use qualitative data from on-going work groups to ground and guide this perspective on how communication technology shapes status negotiation.

[1]  R. Daft,et al.  A Tentative Exploration into the Amount and Equivocality of Information Processing in Organizational Work Units. , 1981 .

[2]  J. Sherblom.  Direction, Function, and Signature in Electronic Mail , 1988 .

[3]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[4]  R. Daft,et al.  Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations , 1987 .

[5]  Janet Fulk.  Social construction of communication technology , 1993 .

[6]  K. Matheson.  Social cues in computer-mediated negotiations: Gender makes a difference , 1991 .

[7]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[8]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting in a computer supported meeting environment , 1991 .

[9]  Tim O'Shea,et al.  'Flaming' in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. , 1992 .

[10]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail , 1991 .

[11]  John F. Padgett,et al.  Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434 , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Computer Communication and Organizational Commitment: Tracing the Relationship in a City Government , 1989 .

[13]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  Toward a theory of organizational socialization , 1977 .

[14]  J. Walther.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[15]  S. R. Hiltz.  The Network Nation , 1978 .

[16]  R. Rice,et al.  Electronic Emotion , 1987 .

[17]  J. Walther,et al.  Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .

[18]  S LeeAllen.  Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication , 1994 .

[19]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  What Is the Relationship Between Socioemotional Behavior and Status in Task Groups? , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[21]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[22]  David A. Owens,et al.  Status contests in meetings: Negotiating the informal order. , 2001 .

[23]  M. Feldman,et al.  Electronic Mail and Organizational Communication: Does Saying Hi Really Matter? , 1998 .

[24]  G. Hiemstra.  Teleconferencing, Concern for Face, and Organizational Culture , 1982 .

[25]  R. Daft,et al.  Understanding Managers' Media Choices: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective , 1990 .

[26]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Status, rewards, and influence , 1985 .

[27]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[28]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media , 1992 .

[29]  Sherry K. Schneider,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION AND SOCIAL INFORMATION: STATUS SALIENCE AND STATUS DIFFERENCES , 1995 .

[30]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Gender and Democracy in Computer-Mediated Communication , 1995, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[31]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[32]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[33]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[34]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  The second self: computers and the human spirit , 1984 .

[35]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[36]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Structuring of Genres in Electronic Communication: Reinforcement and Change of Social Interaction , 1999 .

[37]  Gary Gumpert,et al.  Inter/Media: Interpersonal Communication in a Media World , 1983 .

[38]  M. Knapp,et al.  Nonverbal communication in human interaction , 1972 .

[39]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[40]  Harold H. Kelley,et al.  Communication in Experimentally Created Hierarchies , 1951 .

[41]  L. Adrianson,et al.  Group processes in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication , 1991 .

[42]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[43]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[44]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[45]  R. Bales,et al.  Channels of communication in small groups. , 1951 .

[46]  N. Contractor,et al.  Communication networks and new media in organizations , 1990 .