New image-guided ultra-minimally invasive lumbar decompression method: the mild procedure.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Lumbar canal stenosis is a common source of chronic low back and leg pain. Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression (mild(R)) is a new minimally invasive treatment for pain relief from symptomatic central lumbar canal stenosis. The procedure involves limited percutaneous laminotomy and thinning of the ligamentum flavum in order to increase the critical diameter of the stenosed spinal canal. The objective of this technical report is to evaluate the acute safety of the mild procedure. METHODS Manual and electronic chart survey was conducted by 14 treating physicians located in 9 U.S. states on 90 consecutive patients who underwent the mild procedure. Patients within local geographical practice areas were selected in keeping with product Instructions For Use. Those patients requiring lumbar decompression via tissue resection at the perilaminar space, within the interlaminar space and at the ventral aspect of the lamina were treated. Data collected included any complications and/or adverse events occurring during or immediately following the procedure prior to discharge. RESULTS Of 90 procedures reviewed, there were no major adverse events or complications related to the devices or procedure. No incidents of dural puncture or tear, blood transfusion, nerve injury, epidural bleeding, or hematoma were observed. LIMITATIONS Data were not specifically collected; however, regardless of difficulty, in this series none of the procedures were aborted and none resulted in adverse events. Efficacy parameters were not collected in this safety survey. CONCLUSIONS This review demonstrates the acute safety of the mild procedure with no report of significant or unusual patient complications. To establish complication frequency and longer-term safety profile associated with the treatment, additional studies are currently being conducted. Survey data on file at Vertos Medical, Inc.

[1]  Brett Hanscom,et al.  Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  N. Epstein The Frequency and Etiology of Intraoperative Dural Tears in 110 Predominantly Geriatric Patients Undergoing Multilevel Laminectomy With Noninstrumented Fusions , 2007, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[3]  J. Gilsbach,et al.  LONG‐TERM RESULTS OF MICROSURGICAL TREATMENT OF LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS BY UNILATERAL LAMINOTOMY FOR BILATERAL DECOMPRESSION , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[4]  James D. Kang,et al.  Postoperative Management Protocol for Incidental Dural Tears During Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of 3,183 Consecutive Degenerative Lumbar Cases , 2006, Spine.

[5]  V. Podichetty,et al.  Complications Associated With Minimally Invasive Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[6]  J. Wöhrle,et al.  Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[7]  R. Keller,et al.  The Effect of Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment on Longitudinal Outcomes of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Over 10 Years , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[8]  J. Arima,et al.  Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Technical note. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[9]  P. Sell,et al.  Incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgery: incidence and management , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[10]  H. Bohlman,et al.  Surgery of the Lumbar Spine for Spinal Stenosis in 118 Patients 70 Years of Age or Older , 2003, Spine.

[11]  R. Deyo,et al.  The Maine Lumbar Spine Study, Part III: 1‐Year Outcomes of Surgical and Nonsurgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 1996, Spine.

[12]  P. Lewis,et al.  Decompressive lumbar laminectomy for spinal stenosis. , 1993, Journal of neurosurgery.