Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Aeromechanics and Handling Qualities

A design optimization study is presented in which rotor dynamics and flight dynamics are simultaneously taken into account to maximize the damping of a rotor lag mode. The design variables include rotor, airframe, and flight control system parameters. The constraints address rotor stability and loads and handling qualities. Two design optimization cases are considered, one with only constraints computed from the linearized model of the helicopter and the other with additional constraints that require the integration of the nonlinear equations of motion. Both finite difference and semi-analytical gradients are used for some constraints. The optimization procedure increases the lag mode damping by up to 90%, while satisfying all of the constraints, primarily by reducing the blade torsion stiffness. The aeromechanic design problem is a multidisciplinary problem. The constraint active at the optimum is the level 1 handling qualities requirement in the pitch axis. Optimization provides a framework to manage multidisciplinary problems systematically and efficiently. Using semi-analytical gradients of the constraints computed from the linearized model yields the same results as with finite difference gradients, but more efficiently. The computational advantage increases with problem size. Further advances in computer hardware and in optimization algorithms, including efficient sensitivity analyses, will help make numerical optimization a practical design tool.

[1]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design: With Applications , 1984 .

[2]  Roberto Celi,et al.  Improvement Of Off-Design Characteristics In Integrated Rotor-Flight Control System Optimization , 1997 .

[3]  William S. Levine,et al.  CONDUIT: A New Multidisciplinary Integration Environment for Flight Control Development , 1997 .

[4]  Jeffrey D. Keller,et al.  An investigation of helicopter dynamic coupling using an analytical model , 1996 .

[5]  Roberto Celi,et al.  Recent Applications of Design Optimization to Rotorcraft-A Survey , 1999 .

[6]  W. R. Mantay,et al.  Integrated multidisciplinary design optimization of rotorcraft , 1989 .

[7]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Numerical optimization techniques for engineering design , 1999 .

[8]  Roberto Celi,et al.  Efficient Treatment of Moderate Amplitude Constraints for Handling Qualities Design Optimization , 1996 .

[9]  Roberto Celi,et al.  Helicopter Flight Dynamic Simulation with Refined Aerodynamics and Flexible Blade Modeling , 2000 .

[10]  Avrdec,et al.  Control Law Design and Optimization for Rotorcraft Handling Qualities Criteria Using CONDUIT , 1999 .

[11]  Roberto Celi,et al.  Integrated Rotor-Flight Control System Optimization with Aeroelastic and Handling Qualities Constraints , 1995 .

[12]  Roberto Celi,et al.  Efficient Treatment of Moderate Amplitude Constraints for Helicopter Handling Qualities Design Optimization , 1997 .

[13]  Roberto Celi,et al.  High-order state space simulation models of helicopter flight mechanics , 1993 .

[14]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  Helicopter vibration reduction using structural optimization with aeroelastic/multidisciplinary constraints - A survey , 1991 .

[15]  Roberto Celi,et al.  Design Sensitivity Analysis for Helicopter Flight Dynamic and Aeromechanic Stability , 2003 .

[16]  Roberto Celi,et al.  Forward flight trim calculation and frequency response validation of a high-order helicopter simulation model , 1991 .

[17]  Roberto Celi,et al.  Forward flight trim and frequency response validation of a helicopter simulation model , 1993 .

[18]  Roberto Celi,et al.  Optimum Aeroelastic Design of Helicopter Rotors for Longitudinal Handling Qualities Improvement , 1991 .

[19]  Roberto,et al.  Design Sensitivity Analysis for ADS-33 Quickness Criteria and Maneuver Loads , 2002 .