Transnational capital, the state and foreign economic policy: Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan

Various discourses and debates on the state - transnational capital relationship have emerged within the international political economy literature. The particular contribution offered here focuses on this relationship in three East Asian developmental states (Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan - the NIE-3) through the lens of foreign economic policy (FEP) analysis. In different ways their respective state governments have all worked closely alongside various forms of transnational capital in sustained yet evolving ‘adaptive partnerships’, and in accordance to largely state-determined FEP objectives. Moreover, these objectives broadly relate to the pursuit of economic security in the international system. While each of the NIE-3's own path of economic development has differed significantly, there nevertheless exist important similarities. This not just relates to being constituent to the East Asian regional economic dynamic but also their shared developmental state tradition. The relationship between the state and transnational capital is also key to understanding the NIE-3's foreign economic policy formation, although this has differed significantly across the group. In sum, this study analyses just one of many contemporary examples where both the state and transnational capital are working to congruent ends in their respective adaptations to the challenges posed by globalization.

[1]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Power and interdependence , 1977 .

[2]  Stephan Haggard.  The Newly Industrializing Countries in the International System , 1986, World Politics.

[3]  Peter B. Evans.  Bringing the State Back In: Transnational Linkages and the Economic Role of the State: An Analysis of Developing and Industrialized Nations in the Post–World War II Period , 1985 .

[4]  Frederic C. Deyo,et al.  The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism ed. by Frederic C. Deyo (review) , 1987, Asian Perspective.

[5]  Chí Huang.  The State and Foreign Investment , 1989 .

[6]  R. Wade.  Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization , 1991 .

[7]  Russell Mardon.  The State and The Effective Control of Foreign Capital: The Case of South Korea , 1990, World Politics.

[8]  C. Pitelis.  Beyond the Nation-State?: The Transnational Firm and the Nation-State , 1991 .

[9]  J. Stopford,et al.  Rival States, Rival Firms: Competition for World Market Shares , 1991 .

[10]  J. Stopford,et al.  Rival States, Rival Firms: Acknowledgements , 1991 .

[11]  A. Amsden.  Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization , 1991 .

[12]  Robert Grosse,et al.  Theory in international business , 1992 .

[13]  Leon J. Goldstein.  The End of History and the Last Man , 1993 .

[14]  Y. Bradshaw,et al.  Transnational Economic Linkages, the State, and Dependent Development in South Korea, 1966—1988: A Time-Series Analysis , 1993 .

[15]  B. Jessop.  Towards a Schumpeterian Workfare State? Preliminary Remarks on Post-Fordist Political Economy , 1993 .

[16]  D. Gordon,et al.  Social structures of accumulation: The global economy: new edifice or crumbling foundations? , 1994 .

[17]  Razeen. Sally.  Multinational enterprises, political economy and institutional theory: domestic embeddedness in the context of internationalization , 1994 .

[18]  V. Cable.  After the nation-state: citizens, tribalism and the new world disorder , 1994 .

[19]  W. Form,et al.  Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. , 1996 .

[20]  W. G. Huff,et al.  The developmental state, government, and Singapore's economic development since 1960 , 1995 .

[21]  Linda Weiss,et al.  Governed Interdependence: Rethinking the Government-Business Relationship In East Asia , 1995 .

[22]  K. Ohmae,et al.  The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies , 1995 .

[23]  Thomas Risse-Kappen,et al.  Bringing Transnational Relations Back in: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions , 1995 .

[24]  Edgar C. Schein.  Strategic Pragmatism: The Culture of Singapore's Economics Development Board , 1996 .

[25]  B. Gills.  Economic liberalisation and reform in South Korea in the 1990s: A 'coming of age' or a case of 'graduation blues'? , 1996 .

[26]  W. Robinson.  Globalisation: nine theses on our epoch , 1996 .

[27]  You-tien Hsing,et al.  Blood, Thicker than Water: Interpersonal Relations and Taiwanese Investment in Southern China , 1996 .

[28]  C. Dent,et al.  Korean foreign direct investment in Europe: The determining forces , 1996 .

[29]  D. Coghlan.  Strategic Pragmatism: The Culture of Singapore's Economic Development Board , 1996 .

[30]  C. Clark,et al.  MNCs and Developmentalism: Domestic Structures as an Explanation for East Asian Dynamism , 1996 .

[31]  Philip G. Cerny,et al.  Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization , 1997 .

[32]  Peter Evans,et al.  The Eclipse of the State? Reflections on Stateness in an Era of Globalization , 1997, World Politics.

[33]  M. Shaw.  The State of Globalization: Towards a Theory of State Transformation , 1997 .

[34]  M. Mann,et al.  Has globalization ended the rise and rise of the nation-state? , 1997 .

[35]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  The Global Economy and the Nation-State , 1997 .

[36]  David A. Smith.  Technology, commodity chains and global inequality: South Korea in the 1990s , 1997 .

[37]  Bob Jessop,et al.  Capitalism and its future: remarks on regulation, government and governance , 1997 .

[38]  K. Pijl.  Transnational classes and international relations , 1998 .

[39]  Cheng-tian Kuo.  Private Governance in Taiwan , 1998 .

[40]  Wealth and Freedom , 1998 .

[41]  Linda Weiss,et al.  The Myth of the Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era , 1998 .

[42]  “If You Want to Get Somewhere Else, You Must Run at Least Twice as Fast as That!”: The Roots of the East Asian Crisis , 1999 .

[43]  M. Woo-cumings,et al.  The developmental state , 1999 .

[44]  Yun-Tae Kim,et al.  Neoliberalism and the decline of the developmental state , 1999 .

[45]  Jerry Harris,et al.  Towards a global ruling class? globalization and the transnational capitalist class , 2000 .

[46]  Ping Deng.  Taiwan's Restriction of Investment in China in the 1990s: A Relative Gains Approach , 2000 .

[47]  Alexius A. Pereira.  State Collaboration with Transnational Corporations: The Case of Singapore's Industrial Programmes (1965–1999) , 2000 .

[48]  P. Dicken.  Global Shift: Transforming the World Economy , 2000 .

[49]  Linda Weiss,et al.  Developmental states in transition: adapting, dismantling, innovating, not ‘normalizing’ , 2000 .

[50]  C. Dent.  What Difference a Crisis? Continuity and Change in South Korea's Foreign Economic Policy , 2000 .

[51]  H. Yeung.  State intervention and neoliberalism in the globalizing world economy: lessons from Singapore's regionalization programme , 2000 .

[52]  Raymond Vernon,et al.  Sovereignty At Bay , 2001 .

[53]  Elizabeth Thurbon.  Two paths to financial liberalization: South Korea and Taiwan , 2001 .

[54]  E. Thompson,et al.  Effects of the Asian financial crisis on transnational capital , 2001 .

[55]  C. Dent.  Singapore's Foreign Economic Policy: The Pursuit of Economic Security , 2001 .

[56]  英夫 田部井.  MITI and the Japanese Miracle〔仏文〕 , 2002 .

[57]  The Foreign Economic Policies of Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan , 2002 .

[58]  The Foreign Economic Policies of Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan: By Christopher M. Dent. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2002. xxi+330 pp., index, $100.00. , 2003 .

[59]  Comment: crisis and the developmental state in East Asia , 2003 .