Statistical tolerance analysis of a hyperstatic mechanism, using system reliability methods

The quality level of a mechanism can be evaluated a posteriori after several months by following the number of warranty returns. However, it is more interesting to evaluate a predicted quality level in the design stage: this is one of the aims of statistical tolerance analysis. A possible method consists of computing the defect probability (P"D) expressed in ppm. It represents the probability that a functional requirement will not be satisfied in mass production. For assembly reasons, many hyperstatic mechanisms require gaps, which their functional requirements depend on. The defect probability assessment of such mechanisms is not straightforward, and requires advanced numerical methods. This problem particularly interests the VALEO W.S. company, which experiences problems with an assembly containing gaps. This paper proposes an innovative methodology to formulate and compute the defect probability of hyperstatic mechanisms with gaps in two steps. First, a complex feasibility problem is converted into a simpler problem. Then the defect probability is efficiently computed thanks to system reliability methods and the m-dimensional multivariate normal distribution @F"m. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is provided to improve the original design. The whole approach is illustrated with an industrial case study, but can be adapted to other similar problems.

[1]  Alex Ballu,et al.  Geometrical reliability of overconstrained mechanisms with gaps , 2008 .

[2]  Jean-Yves Dantan,et al.  Improved algorithm for tolerance allocation based on Monte Carlo simulation and discrete optimization , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[3]  Jean-Yves Dantan,et al.  Worst-case and statistical tolerance analysis based on quantified constraint satisfaction problems and Monte Carlo simulation , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[4]  T. C. Woo,et al.  Tolerances: Their Analysis and Synthesis , 1990 .

[5]  A. Genz Numerical Computation of Multivariate Normal Probabilities , 1992 .

[6]  Saralees Nadarajah,et al.  On the approximations for multinormal integration , 2008, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[7]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  APTA: advanced probability-based tolerance analysis of products , 2011 .

[8]  O. Ditlevsen,et al.  Methods of structural systems reliability , 1986 .

[9]  Spencer Graves Tolerance Analysis Tailored to Your Organization , 2001 .

[10]  Hidetoshi Nakayasu,et al.  Reliability design of structural system with cost effectiveness during life cycle , 2002 .

[11]  David H. Evans,et al.  Statistical Tolerancing: The State of the Art, Part I. Background , 1974 .

[12]  David H. Evans Statistical Tolerancing: The State of the Art: Part II. Methods for Estimating Moments , 1975 .

[13]  F. Scholz,et al.  Tolerance Stack Analysis Methods A Critical Review , 2007 .

[14]  David H. Evans,et al.  Statistical Tolerancing: The State of the Art, Part III. Shifts and Drifts , 1975 .

[15]  Zhihua Zou,et al.  A gap-based approach to capture fitting conditions for mechanical assembly , 2004, Comput. Aided Des..

[16]  Abdessalem Hassani,et al.  Méthodologie d'analyse et d'optimisation des tolérances dans un contexte de conception intégrée : TOL_ANALYSES , 2008 .

[17]  Joshua U. Turner,et al.  Review of statistical approaches to tolerance analysis , 1995, Comput. Aided Des..

[18]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Two Improved Algorithms for Reliability Analysis , 1995 .

[19]  Gordon J. Savage,et al.  Optimal Mean and Tolerance Allocation Using Conformance-based Design , 2006, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[20]  Kenneth W. Chase,et al.  A SECOND-ORDER METHOD FOR ASSEMBLY TOLERANCE ANALYSIS , 1999 .