Fabric-based Tsai-Wu yield criteria for vertebral trabecular bone in stress and strain space.

Osteoporosis related vertebral fractures are an increasing clinical problem in ageing societies. The prediction of vertebral fracture load from QCT-based anatomy-specific finite element simulations could be very useful in the management of patients with osteoporosis, especially with regard to a possible fracture prevention or treatment optimisation. A key property in finite element analysis is the yield surface for the trabecular bone material. This study is aimed at identifying continuum-level yield criteria for vertebral trabecular bone using micro-finite element models subjected to uni-axial, shear, and tri-axial loading. A fabric-dependent, orthotropic Tsai-Wu yield criterion is proposed in both stress and strain spaces. Nonlinear micro-finite element models of cubic vertebral trabecular bone samples with 5.62 mm edge length were generated from μCT-scans. Kinematic boundary conditions were imposed and the specimen was loaded force controlled beyond yield in 17 different load cases (six uni-axial, three shear and eight multi-axial). The proposed yield criteria were fitted to the resulting yield data. Yield strains on-axis were significantly lower (10% in tension and 6% in compression) than in the transverse directions. Average yield strains were 0.7% in tension, 1.1% in compression, 1.0% in shear and ranged from 0.6% to 1.1% under multi-axial loading. In axial direction, maximum yield stress was 2.6 MPa in tension and 4.7 MPa in compression. Lowest shear stress was found in the transverse plane with 1.3 MPa. Multi-axial yield stresses ranged between values for uni-axial tension and compression. Yield stresses depended significantly and substantially on both volume fraction and fabric. Yield strains depended also significantly on both bone volume fraction and fabric, but only weakly on the former. The standard error of the estimate and the concordance correlation coefficient of the yield surface were 5.47% and 0.93 in strain space and 13.58% and 0.96 in stress space. The results of this study are not only consistent with experimental data from the literature but also extend the current knowledge of yield to multi-axial load cases that can hardly be realised in a biomechanical experiment. The presented yield data and criteria will help improving the prediction of vertebral ultimate load using anatomy-specific finite element models.

[1]  K. Un,et al.  The effects of side-artifacts on the elastic modulus of trabecular bone. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Stephen C. Cowin,et al.  FABRIC DEPENDENCE OF AN ANISOTROPIC STRENGTH CRITERION , 1986 .

[3]  Panayiotis Papadopoulos,et al.  The modified super-ellipsoid yield criterion for human trabecular bone. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  P. Zysset,et al.  Rehydration of vertebral trabecular bone: influences on its anisotropy, its stiffness and the indentation work with a view to age, gender and vertebral level. , 2010, Bone.

[5]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  P. Zysset,et al.  Valid micro finite element models of vertebral trabecular bone can be obtained using tissue properties measured with nanoindentation under wet conditions. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  P. Zysset,et al.  Damage accumulation in vertebral trabecular bone depends on loading mode and direction. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  P. Zysset,et al.  An Alternative Fabric-based Yield and Failure Criterion for Trabecular Bone , 2006 .

[9]  A. El Maghraoui,et al.  Vertebral fracture assessment in healthy men: prevalence and risk factors. , 2008, Bone.

[10]  Uwe Wolfram,et al.  Vertebral trabecular main direction can be determined from clinical CT datasets using the gradient structure tensor and not the inertia tensor--a case study. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone strength predictions using finite element analysis of micro-scale images at limited spatial resolution. , 2009, Bone.

[12]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Direct mechanics assessment of elastic symmetries and properties of trabecular bone architecture. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Y P Arramon,et al.  Application of the Tsai-Wu quadratic multiaxial failure criterion to bovine trabecular bone. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[14]  R Dumas,et al.  Mechanical characterization in shear of human femoral cancellous bone: torsion and shear tests. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[15]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Micro-finite Element Simulation of Trabecular-bone Post-yield Behaviour -effects of Material Model, Element Size and Type Micro-finite Element Simulation of Trabecular-bone Post-yield Behaviour – Effects of Ma , 2022 .

[16]  L. Lin,et al.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.

[17]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  The role of fabric in the quasi-static compressive mechanical properties of human trabecular bone from various anatomical locations , 2008, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[18]  S. A. Goldstein,et al.  A Novel 3D Microstructural Model for Trabecular Bone: I. The Relationship between Fabric and Elasticity. , 1998, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[19]  L. Dormieux,et al.  Micromechanical approach to the strength properties of frictional geomaterials , 2009 .

[20]  P. Zysset,et al.  Influence of boundary conditions on computed apparent elastic properties of cancellous bone , 2008, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[21]  G. Niebur,et al.  High-resolution finite element models with tissue strength asymmetry accurately predict failure of trabecular bone. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Stephen W. Tsai,et al.  A General Theory of Strength for Anisotropic Materials , 1971 .

[23]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Damage in trabecular bone at small strains. , 2005, European journal of morphology.

[24]  Philippe K Zysset,et al.  A review of morphology-elasticity relationships in human trabecular bone: theories and experiments. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Side-artifact errors in yield strength and elastic modulus for human trabecular bone and their dependence on bone volume fraction and anatomic site. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  P. Zysset,et al.  Valid μ finite element models of vertebral trabecular bone can be obtained using tissue properties measured with nanoindentation under wet conditions , 2010 .

[28]  Philippe K. Zysset,et al.  Multi-axial mechanical properties of human trabecular bone , 2009, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[29]  Glen L Niebur,et al.  Biaxial failure behavior of bovine tibial trabecular bone. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[30]  G. Niebur,et al.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  T M Keaveny,et al.  A cellular solid criterion for predicting the axial-shear failure properties of bovine trabecular bone. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[32]  Tony M Keaveny,et al.  Heterogeneity of yield strain in low-density versus high-density human trabecular bone. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  Matthew J Silva,et al.  Biomechanics of osteoporotic fractures. , 2007, Injury.