What are the shapes of response time distributions in visual search?

Many visual search experiments measure response time (RT) as their primary dependent variable. Analyses typically focus on mean (or median) RT. However, given enough data, the RT distribution can be a rich source of information. For this paper, we collected about 500 trials per cell per observer for both target-present and target-absent displays in each of three classic search tasks: feature search, with the target defined by color; conjunction search, with the target defined by both color and orientation; and spatial configuration search for a 2 among distractor 5s. This large data set allows us to characterize the RT distributions in detail. We present the raw RT distributions and fit several psychologically motivated functions (ex-Gaussian, ex-Wald, Gamma, and Weibull) to the data. We analyze and interpret parameter trends from these four functions within the context of theories of visual search.

[1]  L. R. Gottlob,et al.  Location cuing and response time distributions in visual attention , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  D. Balota,et al.  Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[5]  R. Klein,et al.  On the manifestations of memory in visual search. , 2000, Spatial vision.

[6]  M. Cheal,et al.  Attention in visual search: Multiple search classes , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Neurobiology of Attention , 2005 .

[8]  Raymond M. Klein,et al.  Implications of search accuracy for serial self-terminating models of search , 2005 .

[9]  Richard A. Chechile,et al.  Mathematical tools for hazard function analysis , 2003 .

[10]  T. Zandt.  Analysis of Response Time Distributions , 2002 .

[11]  R. Hohle.  INFERRED COMPONENTS OF REACTION TIMES AS FUNCTIONS OF FOREPERIOD DURATION. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  Adam Reeves,et al.  A random-ray model for speed and accuracy in perceptual experiments. , 2005, Spatial vision.

[14]  Evan M. Palmer,et al.  Reaction time distributions constrain models of visual search , 2010, Vision Research.

[15]  G. Logan.  Shapes of reaction-time distributions and shapes of learning curves: a test of the instance theory of automaticity. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  A framework for ML estimation of parameters of (mixtures of) common reaction time distributions given optional truncation or censoring , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[17]  W. Schwarz.  ON THE CONVOLUTION OF INVERSE GAUSSIAN AND EXPONENTIAL RANDOM VARIABLES , 2002 .

[18]  M. Masson.  Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[19]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A hierarchical model for estimating response time distributions , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  Todd S. Horowitz,et al.  Visual search has no memory , 1998, Nature.

[21]  R. Luce,et al.  Evidence from auditory simple reaction times for both change and level detectors , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Handbook of experimental psychology , 1951 .

[23]  W. Schwarz.  The ex-Wald distribution as a descriptive model of response times , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[24]  R. Ratcliff.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Short Report: Reaction Time Analysis with Outlier Exclusion: Bias Varies with Sample Size , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[26]  Steven Yantis.  Sensation and Perception , 2013 .

[27]  L. Chelazzi.  Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: A critical look at the evidence , 1999, Psychological research.

[28]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[29]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. , 2007, Psychological review.

[31]  J. Driver,et al.  Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction , 2001, Cognition.

[32]  Stefan Letott,et al.  Statistical Inference Based on the Likelihood , 1999, Technometrics.

[33]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What Can 1 Million Trials Tell Us About Visual Search? , 1998 .

[34]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[35]  Allen Allport,et al.  Visual attention , 1989 .

[36]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The Psychophysical Evidence for a Binding Problem in Human Vision , 1999, Neuron.

[37]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Extending statistics of extremes to distributions varying in position and scale and the implications for race models , 2002 .

[38]  W. Hockley.  Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes. , 1984 .

[39]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[40]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  M. Shadlen,et al.  The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[42]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Retrieval Processes in Recognition Memory , 1976 .

[43]  J. Miller,et al.  A warning about median reaction time. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[45]  Claus Bundesen,et al.  Serial Attention Mechanisms in Visual Search: A Direct Behavioral Demonstration , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Fitting Wald and ex-Wald distributions to response time data: An example using functions for the S-PLUS package , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[47]  W. D. Ross,et al.  A Neural Theory of Attentive Visual Search : Interactions of Boundary , Surface , Spatial , and Object Representations By : Stephen Grossberg , 2004 .

[48]  T. Zandt,et al.  How to fit a response time distribution , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[50]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  D. Mewhort,et al.  Analysis of Response Time Distributions: An Example Using the Stroop Task , 1991 .

[52]  D. Balota,et al.  Levels of selective attention revealed through analyses of response time distributions. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Visual Attention , 2020, Computational Models for Cognitive Vision.

[54]  J. Duncan,et al.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  C. L. M..  The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.

[56]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  Todd S. Horowitz,et al.  Visual Search: The role of memory for rejected distractors , 2005 .

[58]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Continuous Univariate Distributions. , 1995 .