Structural Priming as Implicit Learning in Language Acquisition: The Persistence of Lexical and Structural Priming in 4-Year-Olds

Savage et al. (2003) found that 4-year-old children are subject to sentence-level structural priming in conditions of high lexical overlap between prime and target. The present study investigated whether the process of priming also leads to significant implicit learning. Forty-four English-speaking 4-year-old children were asked to describe a prime picture by repeating a passive sentence, and then they were left to their own devices to describe a target picture. Some children were exposed to a prime set consisting of identical passive sentences across items, whereas others received varied passive sentences (using different verbs) across items. There were 2 main findings. First, varied primes were significantly more effective than identical primes in eliciting passive sentences from the children, showing both a greater immediate effect and a longer lasting effect (varied primes, but not identical primes, were still effective after a week). Second, the effect of the varied primes persisted for up to a month, but only for those children who received the opportunity to name pictures at the 1-week interval (reinforcement). These results provide the first evidence that priming in young children is sensitive to variation across the prime set and that it can be quite long lasting, suggesting that during the priming session children are also learning and so modifying their linguistic representations.

[1]  M. Braine Children's First Word Combinations. , 1976 .

[2]  M. Bowerman Starting to talk worse: Clues to language acquisition from children's late speech errors , 1982 .

[3]  S. Garrod,et al.  Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination , 1987, Cognition.

[4]  M. Bowerman The 'no negative evidence' problem: How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? , 1988 .

[5]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Understanding by addressees and overhearers , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  K. Bock,et al.  Framing sentences , 1990, Cognition.

[7]  H. Lempert Acquisition of passives: the role of patient animacy, salience, and lexical accessibility , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[8]  M. R. Manzini Learnability and Cognition , 1991 .

[9]  K. Bock,et al.  From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992, Psychological review.

[10]  S. Garrod,et al.  The Development of Dialogue Co-ordination Skills in Schoolchildren. , 1993 .

[11]  S. Garrod,et al.  Conversation, co-ordination and convention: an empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions , 1994, Cognition.

[12]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Regular morphology and the lexicon. , 1995 .

[13]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Differential productivity in young children's use of nouns and verbs , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[15]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Rethinking infant knowledge: toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks. , 1997, Psychological review.

[16]  J. Pine,et al.  Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[17]  J. Pine,et al.  Comparing different models of the development of the English verb category , 1998 .

[18]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Syntactic Persistence in Dutch , 1998, Language and speech.

[19]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Priming Word Order in Sentence Production , 1999 .

[20]  Familiarity breeds consent : is structural facilitation evidence for the implicit knowledge of syntactic structures? , 1999 .

[21]  M. Pickering,et al.  Syntactic priming in language production , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  N. Akhtar,et al.  Acquiring basic word order: evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure , 1999, Journal of Child Language.

[23]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue , 2000, Cognition.

[25]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Structural Priming as Implicit Learning: A Comparison of Models of Sentence Production , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[26]  M. Tomasello Do young children have adult syntactic competence? , 2000, Cognition.

[27]  Andrew J. Stewart,et al.  Syntactic priming in spoken production: Linguistic and temporal interference , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[28]  William Croft,et al.  Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective , 2001 .

[29]  Jane B. Childers,et al.  The role of pronouns in young children's acquisition of the English transitive construction. , 2001, Developmental psychology.

[30]  Michael Israel,et al.  From states to events: The acquisition of English passive participles* , 2001 .

[31]  M. Tomasello,et al.  What preschool children do and do not do with ungrammatical word orders , 2001 .

[32]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Encyclopedia of the Human Brain , 2002 .

[33]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations: lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. , 2003, Developmental science.

[34]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The role of the input in the acquisition of third person singular verbs in English. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[35]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Early syntactic creativity: a usage-based approach. , 2003, Journal of child language.

[36]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Syntactic priming in young children , 2004 .

[37]  Julian M. Pine,et al.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. , 2004 .

[38]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order , 2005 .

[39]  Joan L. Bybee The Emergent Lexicon , 2007 .