Semantic feature production norms for a large set of objects and events

Semantic features produced by speakers of a language when given a word corresponding to a concept have provided insight into numerous behavioral phenomena concerning semantic representation in language-impaired and -unimpaired speakers. A number of theories concerning the organization of semantic memory have used features as their starting point. Here, we provide a set of feature norms collected from approximately 280 participants for a total of 456 words (169 nouns referring to objects, 71 nouns referring to events, and 216 verbs referring to events). Whereas a number of feature norms for object concepts already exist, we provide the first set of norms for event concepts. We have used these norms (for both objects and events) in research addressing questions concerning the similarities and differences between the semantic representation of objects and events and in research concerning the interface between semantics and syntax, given that events can be expressed in language as nouns or verbs. Some of this research is summarized here. These norms may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive.

[1]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[2]  Ken McRae,et al.  Further evidence for feature correlations in semantic memory. , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[3]  S. Scott,et al.  The role of semantics and grammatical class in the neural representation of words. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach , 2004 .

[5]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Differences in interconcept organization between nouns and verbs , 1987 .

[6]  Alex Martin,et al.  Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. , 2004, Psychological review.

[8]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[9]  Joseph T. Devlin,et al.  The emergence of category specific deficits in a distributed semantic system , 2002 .

[10]  Ken McRae,et al.  Category - Specific semantic deficits , 2008 .

[11]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Category specificity in brain and mind , 2002 .

[12]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Category-Specific Semantic Deficits in Focal and Widespread Brain Damage: A Computational Account , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  A. Damasio,et al.  Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Patterns of dissociation in comprehension and production of nouns and verbs , 1988 .

[15]  J. Hodges,et al.  Semantic feature knowledge and picture naming in dementia of Alzheimer’s type: A new approach , 2005, Brain and Language.

[16]  David P. Vinson,et al.  Semantic similarity and grammatical class in naming actions , 2005, Cognition.

[17]  Chris McNorgan,et al.  An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: simulating semantic priming , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  G. Miller,et al.  Semantic networks of english , 1991, Cognition.

[19]  W. Levelt,et al.  Semantic distance effects on object and action naming , 2002, Cognition.

[20]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[21]  George S. Cree,et al.  Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: Implications for theories of semantic memory. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Janellen Huttenlocher,et al.  The semantic organization of some simple nouns and verbs , 1979 .

[23]  S. Cappa,et al.  The breakdown of semantic knowledge: Insights from a statistical model of meaning representation , 2003, Brain and Language.

[24]  Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Frequency and Imageability: Noun and Verb Production in Semantic Dementia , 2000, Brain and Language.

[25]  George S. Cree,et al.  Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits , 2001 .

[26]  T. Shallice,et al.  Category specific semantic impairments , 1984 .

[27]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  L. K. Tyler,et al.  Conceptual Structure and the Structure of Concepts: A Distributed Account of Category-Specific Deficits , 2000, Brain and Language.

[29]  H. Coslett,et al.  Reversal of the concreteness effect in a patient with semantic dementia , 1994 .

[30]  G. Gainotti,et al.  Evidence for a possible neuroanatomical basis for lexical processing of nouns and verbs , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Lesioning an attractor network: investigations of acquired dyslexia , 1991 .

[32]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. , 1974 .

[34]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Semantic and grammatical class effects in naming actions. , 2005 .

[35]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[36]  M. Garrett,et al.  Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. , 1991 .

[38]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Function and manipulation tool knowledge in apraxia: Knowing ‘what for’ but not ‘how’ , 2000 .

[39]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Explorations in Cognition , 1975 .

[40]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[41]  D. Plaut.  Double dissociation without modularity: evidence from connectionist neuropsychology. , 1995, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[42]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  A semantic analysis of grammatical class impairments: semantic representations of object nouns, action nouns and action verbs , 2002, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[43]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Domain-Specific Knowledge Systems in the Brain: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.