Bayesian analysis of fluorescence lifetime imaging data

Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging (FLIM) is an intensity independent and sensitive optical technique for studying the cellular environment but its accuracy is often compromised when low photon counts are available for analysis. We have developed a photon-by-photon Bayesian analysis method targeted at the accurate analysis of low photon count time-domain FLIM data collected using Time Correlated Single Photon Counting (TCSPC). Parameter estimates obtained with our mono-exponential Bayesian analysis compare favorably with those using maximum likelihood, least squares, and phasor analysis, offering robust estimation with greater precision at very low total photon counts, particularly in the presence of significant background levels. Details of the Bayesian implementation are presented alongside results of mono-exponential analysis of both real and synthetic data. We demonstrate that for low photon count data, obtained by imaging human epithelial carcinoma cells expressing cdc42-GFP, Bayesian analysis estimates the green fluorescent protein (GFP) lifetime to a level of accuracy not obtained using maximum likelihood estimation or other techniques. These results are echoed by the analysis of synthetic decay data incorporating a 10% uniform background, with our Bayesian analysis routines yielding lifetime estimates within an accuracy of 20% with about 50 counts. This level of precision is not achieved with maximum likelihood nor phasor analysis techniques with fewer than 100 counts.

[1]  Mamoru Tamura,et al.  Artefacts in the analysis of temporal response functions measured by photon counting , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  P. R. Barber,et al.  A Bayesian method for single molecule, fluorescence burst analysis , 2010, Biomedical optics express.

[3]  A. Coolen,et al.  Integrating Receptor Signal Inputs That Influence Small Rho GTPase Activation Dynamics at the Immunological Synapse , 2009, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[4]  Charles W. Wilkerson,et al.  Bias and precision in the estimation of exponential decay parameters from sparse data , 1993 .

[5]  C. Spriet,et al.  Three‐dimensional polar representation for multispectral fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy , 2009, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[6]  G. Beddard,et al.  Accurate analysis of fluorescence decays from single molecules in photon counting experiments. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  On the uncertainty in single molecule fluorescent lifetime and energy emission measurements , 1995 .

[8]  Borivoj Vojnovic,et al.  Global and pixel kinetic data analysis for FRET detection by multi-photon time-domain FLIM , 2005, SPIE BiOS.

[9]  Jürgen Wolfrum,et al.  How many photons are necessary for fluorescence-lifetime measurements? , 1992 .

[10]  B. Chromy,et al.  Efficient maximum likelihood estimator fitting of histograms , 2010, Nature Methods.

[11]  P. Verveer,et al.  Graphical representation and multicomponent analysis of single‐frequency fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy data , 2004, Journal of microscopy.

[12]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[13]  S. Ameer-Beg,et al.  Multiphoton time-domain fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy: practical application to protein–protein interactions using global analysis , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[14]  Peter Hall,et al.  Better estimates of exponential decay parameters , 1981 .

[15]  Terry M. Therneau,et al.  Maximum likelihood method for the analysis of time-resolved fluorescence decay curves , 1991, European Biophysics Journal.

[16]  H. Gerritsen,et al.  Fluorescence lifetime imaging in scanning microscopes: acquisition speed, photon economy and lifetime resolution , 2002, Journal of microscopy.