COOPERATING WITH AN ASSISTANCE TOOL FOR SAFE DRIVING

Abstract The LAMIH particularly the research group Human-Machine Systems, has studied human-machine cooperation for many years, in a variety of contexts where safety is essential. Our approach is multi-disciplinary and uses different models and methods to elaborate symbolic and formal representations of human-machine cooperation. Our principal objective is to propose and evaluate a semi-formal framework for modeling cooperative activities between human or artificial agents, each of which has a different level of ability, reliability or adaptability. In the present study, human-machine cooperation was analyzed in order to define and evaluate a system capable of taking the full control of an automobile so as to avoid traffic accidents.

[1]  Michel Basset,et al.  Driver-aid system using path-planning for lateral vehicle control ☆ , 2003 .

[2]  Fabrice Vienne,et al.  How to evaluate the driver's trust in ITS? Example of ACC [adaptive cruise control] , 2004 .

[3]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[4]  Jean-Michel Hoc,et al.  Towards a cognitive approach to human-machine cooperation in dynamic situations , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  An on-road investigation of vehicle feedback and its role in driver cognition: Implications for cognitive ergonomics , 2001 .

[6]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Driving experience and time-sharing during in-car tasks on roads of different width , 1998 .

[7]  A Stevens,et al.  In-vehicle distraction and fatal accidents in England and Wales. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Automatization, automation, and modeling of driver's behavior , 2000 .

[9]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Effect of Selected In-Vehicle Route Guidance Systems on Driver Reaction Times , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[10]  A. H. Jamson,et al.  Traditional and innovative speed-reducing measures for curves: an investigation of driver behaviour using a driving simulator , 2000 .

[11]  Bako Rajaonah,et al.  Driver's behaviors and human-machine interactions characterization for the design of an advanced driving assistance system , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583).

[12]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Philippe Subra.  L'université contre la crise ? Le cas de l'université de Valenciennes et du Hainaut-Cambrésis , 1994 .

[14]  N Moray,et al.  Designing for transportation safety in the light of perception, attention, and mental models. , 1990, Ergonomics.

[15]  John Piggott,et al.  Situational awareness and safety , 2001 .

[16]  Patrick Millot,et al.  An attempt for generic concepts toward human-machine cooperation , 1998, SMC'98 Conference Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.98CH36218).

[17]  Talib Rothengatter,et al.  Strategic adaptations to lack of preview in driving , 1998 .

[18]  Serge Debernard,et al.  A Common Work Space to Support the Air Traffic Control , 2000 .

[19]  Shin Kato,et al.  Applications of inter-vehicle communications to driver assistance system , 2003 .

[20]  P. Millot,et al.  Two Approaches for Man-Computer Cooperation in Supervisory Tasks , 1989 .

[21]  Jean-Michel Hoc,et al.  Diagnosis: some theoretical questions raised by applied research , 1995 .

[22]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Prototyping an intelligent agent through Wizard of Oz , 1993, INTERCHI.