Integrating Supply and Demand Reduction Strategies for Drug Abuse Prevention

Historically, demand and supply reduction approaches to the prevention and control of tobacco, alcohol, and other drug abuse have been treated as independent efforts in the United States, vying for public attention and funding. Separate reviews of research suggest that the more effective components of each approach can reduce potential drug use by 20% to 40% for 3 years and sometimes longer. Review of theories relevant to behavior change suggest that integrating the two approaches could increase this proportion to 40% to 50% for longer periods by synergistically affecting community anti-drug use norms and compliance. This article briefly reviews demand and supply reduction approaches to drug abuse prevention and presents hypothetical models of change in drug use behavior based on program and policy interventions that are introduced sequentially into communities.

[1]  R. Catalano,et al.  Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: implications for substance abuse prevention. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  R. Bonnie,et al.  Growing up Tobacco Free: Preventing Nicotine Addiction in Children and Youths , 1994 .

[3]  M. Moore,et al.  Supply Reduction and Drug Law Enforcement , 1990, Crime and Justice.

[4]  G. Botvin,et al.  Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. , 1995, JAMA.

[5]  P. McGovern,et al.  Availability of cigarettes to underage youth in three communities. , 1992, Preventive medicine.

[6]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Mediating mechanisms in a school-based drug prevention program: first-year effects of the Midwestern Prevention Project. , 1991, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[7]  S. Kelder,et al.  Communitywide smoking prevention: long-term outcomes of the Minnesota Heart Health Program and the Class of 1989 Study. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[8]  D. Altman,et al.  Reducing the illegal sale of cigarettes to minors. , 1989, JAMA.

[9]  D. Allensworth,et al.  Integrated school and community programs. , 1987, The Journal of school health.

[10]  E. Vartiainen,et al.  Eight-year follow-up results of an adolescent smoking prevention program: the North Karelia Youth Project. , 1990, American journal of public health.

[11]  M. Grossman,et al.  Effects of Alcoholic Beverage Prices and Legal Drinking Ages on Youth Alcohol Use , 1988, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[12]  Louise A. Rohrbach,et al.  Diffusion of School-Based Substance Abuse Prevention Programs , 1996 .

[13]  W. B. Hansen School-based substance abuse prevention: a review of the state of the art in curriculum, 1980-1990. , 1992, Health education research.

[14]  L. Wallack,et al.  Contemporary Perspectives for Preventing Alcohol Problems: An Empirically-Derived Model , 1986, Journal of public health policy.

[15]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  The power of policy: the relationship of smoking policy to adolescent smoking. , 1989, American journal of public health.

[16]  H. Kalant,et al.  Drug policy: striking the right balance. , 1990, Science.

[17]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  A multicommunity trial for primary prevention of adolescent drug abuse. Effects on drug use prevalence. , 1989, JAMA.

[18]  S. Casswell,et al.  An evaluated community action project on alcohol. , 1989, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[19]  M. Goodstadt Substance abuse curricula vs. school drug policies. , 1989, The Journal of school health.

[20]  Joel M. Moskowitz The primary prevention of alcohol problems: a critical review of the research literature. , 1989, Journal of studies on alcohol.