Preparations for Y2K: Revisiting the Behavioral Component of the Third‐Person Effect

Although the behavioral component was an integral part of the original formulation of the third-person effect hypothesis, little research has examined the impact of biased media effect perceptions on behaviors that assume others have already been affected. The present study examines how third-person perceptions (the belief that other people are particularly vulnerable to media messages) contributed to intentions to prepare for problems stemming from Y2K, also known as the “millennium bug.” Analyses using data from 2 regional probability samples taken in late 1999 show that perceptions about the potential effects of news messages influenced public anxiety about the Y2K situation and beliefs that other people would overprepare for the new year. These 2 variables, in turn, predicted intentions to stockpile supplies of food, water, gasoline, and cash. The article discusses the implications of these findings for understanding the relationship between perceptions of media effects and an extended range of behaviors.

[1]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[2]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[3]  L. Erwin Atwood,et al.  Illusions of Media Power: The Third-Person Effect , 1994 .

[4]  J. Chapin.  Third-Person Perception and Sexual Risk Taking Among Minority `At-Risk' Youth , 1999 .

[5]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  PERCEIVED IMPACT OF DEFAMATION AN EXPERIMENT ON THIRD-PERSON EFFECTS , 1988 .

[6]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  Overrating the X‐Rating: The Third‐Person Perception and Support for Censorship of Pornography , 1995 .

[7]  W. Davison.  The Third-Person Effect in Communication , 1983 .

[8]  Arne Öhman,et al.  Fear and anxiety as emotional phenomena: Clinical phenomenology, evolutionary perspectives, and information-processing mechanisms. , 1993 .

[9]  Michel Dupagne,et al.  The Third-Person Effect , 1999 .

[10]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Me, us and them: Political identification and the third‐person effect in the 1993 Australian federal election , 1995 .

[11]  Julie M. Duck,et al.  The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third person effect , 1995 .

[12]  Ang Peng Hwa,et al.  PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF TELEVISION INFLUENCE AND OPINIONS ABOUT CENSORSHIP IN SINGAPORE , 1996 .

[13]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  What We Think Others Think , 1991 .

[14]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Support for Censorship of Violent and Misogynic Rap Lyrics , 1997 .

[15]  N. Weinstein.  Unrealistic optimism about future life events , 1980 .

[16]  R M Groves,et al.  Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. , 2000, Public opinion quarterly.

[17]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Susceptibility and Severity , 1999 .

[18]  Paul D. Driscoll,et al.  Consequences of third‐person perception in support of press restrictions in the O. J. Simpson trial , 1997 .

[19]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  FOR THE GOOD OF OTHERS: CENSORSHIP AND THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT , 1996 .

[20]  B. Paul,et al.  IMPACT OF QUESTION ORDER ON THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT , 1999 .

[21]  Charles T. Salmon,et al.  THE ‘OTHER’ AS THE VULNERABLE VOTER: A STUDY OF THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT IN THE 1988 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN , 1990 .

[22]  David H Tewksbury,et al.  Third-person effects on publication of a holocaust-denial advertisement , 1998 .

[23]  Esther Thorson,et al.  Perceived Persuasive Effects of Product Commercials and Public Service Announcements , 1992 .

[24]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[25]  William T. Bielby,et al.  Structural Equation Models , 1977 .

[26]  R. Hoyle.  The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. , 1995 .

[27]  Richard M. Perloff,et al.  The Third Person Effect: A Critical Review and Synthesis , 1999 .

[28]  B. Paul,et al.  The Third-Person Effect: A Meta-Analysis of the Perceptual Hypothesis , 2000 .