Idiotypic networks incorporating T-B cell co-operation. The conditions for percolation.

Previous work was concerned with symmetric immune networks of idiotypic interactions amongst B cell clones. The behaviour of these networks was contrary to expectations. This was caused by an extensive percolation of idiotypic signals. Idiotypic activation was thus expected to affect almost all (greater than 10(7] B cell clones. We here analyse whether the incorporation of helper T cells (Th) into these B cell models could cause a reduction in the percolation. Empirical work on idiotypic interactions between Th and B cells however, would suggest that two different idiotypic Th models should be developed: (1) a Th which recognises native B cell idiotypes, i.e. a non-MHC-restricted "ThId" model, and (2) a "classical" MHC-restricted helper T cell model. In the ThId model, the Th-B cell interaction is symmetric. A 2-D model of a Th and a B cell clone that interact idiotypically with each other accounts for various equilibria (i.e. one virgin and two immune states). Introduction of antigen does indeed lead to a state switch from the virgin to the immune state; such a system is thus able to "remember" its exposure to antigen. Idiotypic signals do however, percolate in ThId models via these "B-Th-B-Th" pathways: proliferating Th and B cell clones that interact idiotypically, will always activate each other reciprocally. In the MHC-restricted Th model, Th-B interactions are asymmetric. Because the B cell idiotypes are processed and subsequently presented by MHC molecules, the Th receptor and the native B cell receptor are not expected to be complementary. Thus the Th and the B cells are unable to activate each other reciprocally, and a 2-D Th-B cell model cannot account for idiotypic memory. In contrast to the ThId model, idiotypic activation cannot percolate via "B-Th-B-Th" interactions. Due to the assymmetry idiotypic activation stops at the first Th level. A Th clone cannot activate a subsequent B cell clone: if the B cells recognise the Th cells, they see idiotype but get no help; if the Th cells see the B cells, the B cells are helped but see no idiotype. The percolation along "B-B-B" pathways in these two models is next analysed. Two B cells clones, each helped by one Th clone, are connected by a symmetric idiotypic interaction. It turns out that in both models the second (i.e. anti-idiotypic) B cells (B2) never proliferate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

[1]  P Hogeweg,et al.  Interactions between macrophages and T-lymphocytes: tumor sneaking through intrinsic to helper T cell dynamics. , 1986, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  P. Hogeweg,et al.  Stability of symmetric idiotypic networks--a critique of Hoffmann's analysis. , 1989, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[3]  Z. Grossman,et al.  Recognition of Self and Regulation of Specificity at the Level of Cell Populations , 1984, Immunological reviews.

[4]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  The immune system, adaptation, and machine learning , 1986 .

[5]  J. Kearney,et al.  Functional characterization of monoclonal auto‐antiidiotype antibodies isolated from the early B cell repertoire of BALB/c mice , 1986, European journal of immunology.

[6]  P. Pereira,et al.  The Participation of B Cells and Antibodies in the Selection and Maintenance of T Cell Repertoires , 1988, Immunological reviews.

[7]  R. J. Boer Symmetric idiotypic networks : connectance and switching, stability, and suppression , 1988 .

[8]  I. Cohen,et al.  Anti-idiotypic network induced by T cell vaccination against experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. , 1988, Science.

[9]  A. Coutinho,et al.  Reactions among IgM antibodies derived from normal, neonatal mice , 1984, European journal of immunology.

[10]  R. J. Boer Extensive Percolation in Reasonable Idiotypic Networks , 1989 .

[11]  H. Wekerle,et al.  Suppression of experimentally induced autoimmune encephalomyelitis by cytolytic T–T cell interactions , 1988, Nature.

[12]  S. Singer,et al.  The specific direct interaction of helper T cells and antigen- presenting B cells. II. Reorientation of the microtubule organizing center and reorganization of the membrane-associated cytoskeleton inside the bound helper T cells , 1987, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[13]  O. Leo,et al.  Idiotypic regulation of the immune system. Common idiotypic specificities between idiotypes and antibodies raised against anti- idiotypic antibodies in rabbits , 1979, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  S. Sullman,et al.  The relative distribution of foci forming antibodies to two different haptens in repopulated mouse spleens , 1977, European journal of immunology.

[15]  K. Bottomly 1984: All Idiotypes are Equal, But Some are More Equal Than Others , 1984, Immunological reviews.

[16]  M A Savageau,et al.  Network regulation of the immune response: alternative control points for suppressor modulation of effector lymphocytes. , 1985, Journal of immunology.

[17]  J. Urbain,et al.  Enhancement of antibody response by mouse dendritic cells pulsed with tobacco mosaic virus or with rabbit antiidiotypic antibodies raised against a private rabbit idiotype. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  K. Rajewsky,et al.  Control of idiotope expression by monoclonal anti‐idiotope and idiotope‐bearing antibody , 1981, European journal of immunology.

[19]  J. Claverie,et al.  Working principles in the immune system implied by the "peptidic self" model. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  G W Hoffmann,et al.  A neural network model based on the analogy with the immune system. , 1986, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  A. Coutinho,et al.  Autonomous activation of B and T cells in antigen‐free mice , 1986, European journal of immunology.

[22]  P Hogeweg,et al.  Immunological discrimination between self and non-self by precursor depletion and memory accumulation. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  J. Kearney,et al.  Idiotype‐Directed Interactions during Ontogeny Play a Major Role in the Establishment of the Adult B Cell Repertoire , 1986, Immunological reviews.

[24]  S. Levin Lectu re Notes in Biomathematics , 1983 .

[25]  R. J. Boer Information processing in immune systems : clonal selection versus idiotypic network models , 1989 .

[26]  O. Vainio,et al.  Can B cells turn on virgin T cells? , 1988, Nature.

[27]  C. Janeway Frontiers of the immune system , 1988, Nature.

[28]  H. Grey,et al.  Antigen presentation by splenic B cells: resting B cells are ineffective, whereas activated B cells are effective accessory cells for T cell responses. , 1985, Journal of immunology.

[29]  N. K. Jerne,et al.  Idiotypic Networks and Other Preconceived Ideas , 1984, Immunological reviews.

[30]  F. Melchers,et al.  Factors controlling the B-cell cycle. , 1986, Annual review of immunology.

[31]  Jerne Nk Towards a network theory of the immune system. , 1974 .

[32]  R. Hardy,et al.  Ly-1 B cells: functionally distinct lymphocytes that secrete IgM autoantibodies. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  C. Janeway,et al.  Direct interactions between B and T lymphocytes bearing complementary receptors , 1986, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[34]  C. Janeway The Role of Idiotype and of Immunoglobulin in T-Cell Differentiation and Function , 1984 .

[35]  M. Fougereau,et al.  Breaking The First Circle , 1988, Immunological reviews.

[36]  M Kaufman,et al.  Model analysis of the bases of multistationarity in the humoral immune response. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[37]  H. Waldmann,et al.  Restriction in the function of single helper T cells. , 1976, Immunology.

[38]  G W Hoffmann,et al.  Qualitative dynamics of a network model of regulation of the immune system: a rationale for the IgM to IgG switch. , 1982, Journal of Theoretical Biology.

[39]  K. Bottomly,et al.  A cloned T cell line that selectively augments antibody responses of phosphorylcholine-specific B cells bearing the T15 idiotype. , 1986, The Journal of molecular and cellular immunology : JMCI.

[40]  A. Coutinho,et al.  The high idiotypic connectivity of “natural” newborn antibodies is not found in adult mitogen‐reactive B cell repertoires , 1986, European journal of immunology.

[41]  M A Savageau,et al.  Network regulation of the immune response: modulation of suppressor lymphocytes by alternative signals including contrasuppression. , 1985, Journal of immunology.

[42]  Pauline Hogeweg,et al.  Unreasonable implications of reasonable idiotypic network assumptions , 1989 .

[43]  Charles A. Janeway,et al.  Receptor-directed focusing of lymphokine release by helper T cells , 1988, Nature.

[44]  G W Hoffmann,et al.  On network theory and H-2 restriction. , 1980, Contemporary topics in immunobiology.

[45]  Pauline Hogeweg,et al.  Memory but no suppression in low-dimensional symmetric idiotypic networks , 1989, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[46]  C. Janeway,et al.  The specific direct interaction of helper T cells and antigen-presenting B cells. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  J. Powers,et al.  A suppressor T-lymphocyte cell line for autoimmune encephalomyelitis , 1988, Nature.

[48]  Geoffrey W. Hoffmann,et al.  A Mathematical Model of the Stable States of a Network Theory of Self-Regulation , 1979 .

[49]  J. Phillips,et al.  Monogamous T helper cell , 1977, Nature.