Powerful regression-based quantitative-trait linkage analysis of general pedigrees.

We present a new method of quantitative-trait linkage analysis that combines the simplicity and robustness of regression-based methods and the generality and greater power of variance-components models. The new method is based on a regression of estimated identity-by-descent (IBD) sharing between relative pairs on the squared sums and squared differences of trait values of the relative pairs. The method is applicable to pedigrees of arbitrary structure and to pedigrees selected on the basis of trait value, provided that population parameters of the trait distribution can be correctly specified. Ambiguous IBD sharing (due to incomplete marker information) can be accommodated in the method by appropriate specification of the variance-covariance matrix of IBD sharing between relative pairs. We have implemented this regression-based method and have performed simulation studies to assess, under a range of conditions, estimation accuracy, type I error rate, and power. For normally distributed traits and in large samples, the method is found to give the correct type I error rate and an unbiased estimate of the proportion of trait variance accounted for by the additive effects of the locus-although, in cases where asymptotic theory is doubtful, significance levels should be checked by simulations. In large sibships, the new method is slightly more powerful than variance-components models. The proposed method provides a practical and powerful tool for the linkage analysis of quantitative traits.

[1]  Blackwelder Wc,et al.  A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci , 1985 .

[2]  J. Henshall,et al.  Multiple-trait mapping of quantitative trait loci after selective genotyping using logistic regression. , 1999, Genetics.

[3]  S. Purcell,et al.  Optimal Sibship Selection for Genotyping in Quantitative Trait Locus Linkage Analysis , 2001, Human Heredity.

[4]  E. Lander,et al.  Construction of multilocus genetic linkage maps in humans. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  J. Mathews,et al.  Extensions to multivariate normal models for pedigree analysis , 1982, Annals of human genetics.

[6]  L. Almasy,et al.  Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[7]  R. Elston,et al.  A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. , 1971, Human heredity.

[8]  R. Elston,et al.  A comparison of sib‐pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci , 1985, Genetic epidemiology.

[9]  E Drigalenko,et al.  How sib pairs reveal linkage. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[10]  Daniel F. Gudbjartsson,et al.  Allegro, a new computer program for multipoint linkage analysis , 2000, Nature genetics.

[11]  Elizabeth A. Thompson,et al.  MCMC Estimation of Multi‐locus Genome Sharing and Multipoint Gene Location Scores , 2000 .

[12]  J. C. Houwelingen,et al.  Score test for detecting linkage to quantitative traits , 2002, Genetic epidemiology.

[13]  S. Hodge,et al.  The information contained in multiple sibling pairs , 1984, Genetic epidemiology.

[14]  P. Sham,et al.  Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[15]  P. Sham,et al.  Using risk calculation to implement an extended relative pair analysis , 1994, Annals of human genetics.

[16]  E Feingold,et al.  Methods for linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci in humans. , 2001, Theoretical population biology.

[17]  L Kruglyak,et al.  Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[18]  M C Neale,et al.  Multivariate multipoint linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci , 1996, Behavior genetics.

[19]  Wright Fa The phenotypic difference discards sib-pair QTL linkage information. , 1997 .

[20]  C. Haley,et al.  Selection and subsequent analysis of sib pair data for QTL detection. , 2001, Genetical research.

[21]  N. Schork,et al.  Extended multipoint identity-by-descent analysis of human quantitative traits: efficiency, power, and modeling considerations. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[22]  J. Blangero,et al.  Linkage Analysis of Quantitative Traits in Randomly Ascertained Pedigrees: Comparison of Penetrance‐Based and Variance Component Analysis , 2001, Genetic epidemiology.

[23]  P. Visscher,et al.  Power of regression and maximum likelihood methods to map QTL from sib‐pair and DZ twin data , 2001 .

[24]  E Feingold,et al.  Composite statistics for QTL mapping with moderately discordant sibling pairs. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[25]  S Purcell,et al.  Equivalence between Haseman-Elston and variance-components linkage analyses for sib pairs. , 2001, American journal of human genetics.

[26]  F. Wright The phenotypic difference discards sib-pair QTL linkage information. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[27]  D W Fulker,et al.  An improved multipoint sib-pair analysis of quantitative traits , 1996, Behavior genetics.

[28]  W. Forrest Weighting Improves the ‘New Haseman-Elston’ Method , 2001, Human Heredity.

[29]  D E Weeks,et al.  Multipoint Estimation of Identity-by-Descent Probabilities at Arbitrary Positions among Marker Loci on General Pedigrees , 2001, Human Heredity.

[30]  Lee-Jen Wei,et al.  A unified Haseman-Elston method for testing linkage with quantitative traits. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[31]  J. Huang,et al.  A score-statistic approach for the mapping of quantitative-trait loci with sibships of arbitrary size. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[32]  G. Abecasis,et al.  Merlin—rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[33]  D I Boomsma,et al.  A simulation study of the effects of assignment of prior identity-by-descent probabilities to unselected sib pairs, in covariance-structure modeling of a quantitative-trait locus. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[34]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Multivariate Analysis , 1958, Nature.

[35]  R C Elston,et al.  Haseman and Elston revisited , 2000, Genetic epidemiology.

[36]  T P Speed,et al.  A score test for the linkage analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits based on identity by descent data from sib-pairs. , 2000, Biostatistics.

[37]  P. Sham,et al.  Variance‐components QTL linkage analysis of selected and non‐normal samples: Conditioning on trait values , 2000, Genetic epidemiology.

[38]  R. Elston,et al.  The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus , 1972, Behavior genetics.

[39]  S. Heath Markov chain Monte Carlo segregation and linkage analysis for oligogenic models. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[40]  D. Allison,et al.  Testing the robustness of the new Haseman-Elston quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[41]  C. Amos Robust variance-components approach for assessing genetic linkage in pedigrees. , 1994, American journal of human genetics.