TOPSIS Method for Probabilistic Linguistic MAGDM with Entropy Weight and Its Application to Supplier Selection of New Agricultural Machinery Products

In multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems, uncertain decision information is well-represented by linguistic term sets (LTSs). These LTSs are easily converted into probabilistic linguistic sets (PLTSs). In this paper, a TOPSIS method is proposed for probabilistic linguistic MAGDM in which the attribute weights are completely unknown, and the decision information is in the form of probabilistic linguistic numbers (PLNs). First, the definition of the scoring function is used to solve the probabilistic linguistic entropy, which is then employed to objectively derive the attribute weights. Second, the optimal alternatives are determined by calculating the shortest distance from the probabilistic linguistic positive ideal solution (PLPIS) and on the other side the farthest distance of the probabilistic linguistic negative ideal solution (PLNIS). This proposed method extends the applications range of the traditional entropy-weighted method. Moreover, it doesn’t need the decision-maker to give the attribute weights in advance. Finally, a numerical example for supplier selection of new agricultural machinery products is used to illustrate the use of the proposed method. The result shows the approach is simple, effective and easy to calculate. The proposed method can contribute to the selection of suitable alternative successfully in other selection problems.

[1]  Ren Zhang,et al.  Comparisons of probabilistic linguistic term sets for multi-criteria decision making , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[2]  Lin Zhong,et al.  Two MAGDM models based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets with possibility distributions: VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[3]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Methods for Evaluating the Technological Innovation Capability for the High-Tech Enterprises With Generalized Interval Neutrosophic Number Bonferroni Mean Operators , 2019, IEEE Access.

[4]  Decui Liang,et al.  Grey Relational Analysis Method for Probabilistic Linguistic Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Based on Geometric Bonferroni Mean , 2017, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.

[5]  Jianping Lu,et al.  Models for MADM With 2-Tuple Linguistic Neutrosophic Dombi Bonferroni Mean Operators , 2019, IEEE Access.

[6]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[7]  Xu Zeshu,et al.  Entropy-based Procedures for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 2012 .

[8]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Interval 2-Tuple Linguistic Distance Operators and Their Applications to Supplier Evaluation and Selection , 2016 .

[9]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  The power average operator , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[10]  Huchang Liao,et al.  Novel operations of PLTSs based on the disparity degrees of linguistic terms and their use in designing the probabilistic linguistic ELECTRE III method , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[11]  Huchang Liao,et al.  A Multigranularity Linguistic Group Decision‐Making Method Based on Hesitant 2‐Tuple Sets , 2016, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[12]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  An Approach for Combining Linguistic and Numerical Information Based on the 2-Tuple Fuzzy Linguistic Representation Model in Decision-Making , 2000, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[13]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Extended Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Based on the Hesitant Fuzzy Membership and their Application in Decision Making with Risk Preference , 2018, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[14]  Vicenç Torra,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy sets , 2010, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[15]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy Bonferroni means for multi-criteria decision making , 2013, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[16]  Guiwu Wei,et al.  The generalized Dice similarity measures for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making , 2019, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[17]  Fuad E. Alsaadi,et al.  Some q‐rung orthopair fuzzy Hamy mean operators in multiple attribute decision‐making and their application to enterprise resource planning systems selection , 2019, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[18]  Núria Sánchez-Pantoja,et al.  Method based on life cycle assessment and TOPSIS to integrate environmental award criteria into green public procurement , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[19]  W. H. Furtan,et al.  Entropy, information and economics in firm decision making , 1977 .

[20]  Guiwu Wei,et al.  The generalized dice similarity measures for multiple attribute decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information , 2019, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja.

[21]  Fuad E. Alsaadi,et al.  Bipolar 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[22]  Yong Shi,et al.  Public blockchain evaluation using entropy and TOPSIS , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[23]  Mao Lu,et al.  Some novel similarity and distance measures of pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications , 2019, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems.

[24]  L. Zadeh Probability measures of Fuzzy events , 1968 .

[25]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  The fuzzy cross-entropy for intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in multi-criteria decision-making , 2015, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[26]  Jie Wang,et al.  Research on Risk Evaluation of Enterprise Human Capital Investment With Interval-Valued Bipolar 2-Tuple Linguistic Information , 2018, IEEE Access.

[27]  Hui Gao,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy Muirhead mean operators in multiple attribute decision making for evaluating of emerging technology commercialization , 2019, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja.

[28]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A linear programming method for multiple criteria decision making with probabilistic linguistic information , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[29]  G. Wei,et al.  Some Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Dombi Hamy Mean Operators and Their Application for Evaluating the Elderly Tourism Service Quality in Tourism Destination , 2018, Mathematics.

[30]  Qi Liu,et al.  Probabilistic linguistic QUALIFLEX approach with possibility degree comparison , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[31]  Guiwu Wei,et al.  Some 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean Heronian mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision-making , 2019, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[32]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Selection of carpenter manufacturer using fuzzy EDAS method , 2018, Engineering Economics.

[33]  Vasant Dhar,et al.  Discovering Interesting Patterns for Investment Decision Making with GLOWER ☹—A Genetic Learner Overlaid with Entropy Reduction , 2000, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[34]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Power-Geometric Operators and Their Use in Group Decision Making , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[35]  Animesh Biswas,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS for multicriteria group decision‐making with unknown weight information through entropy measure , 2019, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[36]  Huchang Liao,et al.  Interval-valued 2-tuple hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application in multiple attribute decision making , 2018, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[37]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Pythagorean Fuzzy LINMAP Method Based on the Entropy Theory for Railway Project Investment Decision Making , 2018, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[38]  Rui Wang,et al.  Research on the application of the financial investment risk appraisal models with some interval number muirhead mean operators , 2019, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems.

[39]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[40]  Guiwu Wei,et al.  TODIM Method for Picture Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 2018, Informatica.

[41]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Imprecise Shannon's Entropy and Multi Attribute Decision Making , 2010, Entropy.

[42]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Consistency-Driven Automatic Methodology to Set Interval Numerical Scales of 2-Tuple Linguistic Term Sets and Its Use in the Linguistic GDM With Preference Relation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[43]  K. Atanassov Operators over interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1994 .

[44]  Guiwu Wei,et al.  An Extended VIKOR Method for Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making with Triangular Fuzzy Neutrosophic Numbers , 2018, Symmetry.

[45]  Gui-Wu Wei,et al.  Pythagorean Fuzzy Hamacher Power Aggregation Operators in Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 2019, Fundam. Informaticae.

[46]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  An improved fuzzy MULTIMOORA approach for multi-criteria decision making based on objective weighting method (CCSD) and its application to technological forecasting method selection , 2019, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[47]  Kedi Huang,et al.  Extended VIKOR method based on cross-entropy for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making , 2013 .

[48]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  ELECTRE-IDAT for design decision-making problems with interval data and target-based criteria , 2018, Soft Comput..

[49]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Some methods to deal with unacceptable incomplete 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic preference relations in group decision making , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[50]  Ashkan Hafezalkotob,et al.  Developing the R-TOPSIS methodology for risk-based preventive maintenance planning: A case study in rolling mill company , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[51]  Jie Wang,et al.  Models for Green Supplier Selection with Some 2-Tuple Linguistic Neutrosophic Number Bonferroni Mean Operators , 2018, Symmetry.

[52]  Huaiyu Zhu On Information and Sufficiency , 1997 .

[53]  Guiwu Wei,et al.  Application of correlation coefficient to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making with incomplete weight information , 2009, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[54]  Zhang Kun,et al.  Assessment and sequencing of air target threat based on intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and dynamic VIKOR , 2018 .

[55]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[56]  Cun Wei,et al.  TODIM method for performance appraisal on social-integration-based rural reconstruction with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[57]  Deng-Feng Li,et al.  Some operators of intuitionistic uncertain 2-tuple linguistic variables and application to multi-attribute group decision making with heterogeneous relationship among attributes , 2018, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[58]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Some Interval 2-Tuple Linguistic Harmonic Mean Operators and Their Application in Material Selection , 2016 .

[59]  Huayou Chen,et al.  Entropy measures for linguistic information and its application to decision making , 2015, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[60]  R. Berndtsson,et al.  Evaluation of CMIP5 models for west and southwest Iran using TOPSIS-based method , 2018, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[61]  Debashree Guha,et al.  Article in Press G Model Applied Soft Computing Partitioned Bonferroni Mean Based on Linguistic 2-tuple for Dealing with Multi-attribute Group Decision Making , 2022 .

[62]  Hui Gao,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher Prioritized aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making , 2018, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[63]  Guiwu Wei,et al.  TODIM Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making under 2-Tuple Linguistic Neutrosophic Environment , 2018, Symmetry.

[64]  Guiwu Wei,et al.  2-tuple intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making , 2019 .

[65]  Shahzad Faizi,et al.  A Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach Based on Fuzzy AHP with Intuitionistic 2-Tuple Linguistic Sets , 2018, Adv. Fuzzy Syst..

[66]  Guiwu Wei,et al.  Dual Hesitant Pythagorean Fuzzy Hamy Mean Operators in Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 2019, IEEE Access.

[67]  Wanhua Qiu,et al.  A measure of risk and a decision-making model based on expected utility and entropy , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[68]  Guiwu Wei,et al.  EDAS method for multiple criteria group decision making under 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic environment , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[69]  Hui Gao,et al.  Approaches to strategic supplier selection under interval neutrosophic environment , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[70]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Connecting the linguistic hierarchy and the numerical scale for the 2-tuple linguistic model and its use to deal with hesitant unbalanced linguistic information , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[71]  Xin He,et al.  Probabilistic Linguistic Power Aggregation Operators for Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making , 2017, Symmetry.

[72]  Naveen Aggarwal,et al.  Improved TOPSIS method for peak frame selection in audio-video human emotion recognition , 2019, Multim. Tools Appl..

[73]  Tabasam Rashid,et al.  An Intuitionistic 2‐Tuple Linguistic Information Model and Aggregation Operators , 2016, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[74]  Zhiming Zhang,et al.  Deriving the priority weights from incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations based on multiplicative consistency , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[75]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  ELECTRE II method to deal with probabilistic linguistic term sets and its application to edge computing , 2019, Nonlinear Dynamics.

[76]  Isis Truck,et al.  Toward a Classification of Hesitant Operators in the 2‐Tuple Linguistic Model , 2014, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[77]  K. Atanassov More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1989 .

[78]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  Cloud-based ERP system selection based on extended probabilistic linguistic MULTIMOORA method and Choquet integral operator , 2019, Computational and Applied Mathematics.

[79]  Fuyuan Xiao,et al.  A Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Method Based on D Numbers and Belief Entropy , 2019, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.

[80]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Decision Making , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[81]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words , 2000, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[82]  Mehdi Fasanghari,et al.  An intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making method using entropy and association coefficient , 2012, Soft Computing.

[83]  Ping Wang,et al.  Dual Hesitant q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Hamacher Aggregation Operators and their Applications in Scheme Selection of Construction Project , 2019, Symmetry.

[84]  Xuanhua Xu,et al.  Information entropy risk measure applied to large group decision-making method , 2019, Soft Comput..

[85]  L. A. ZADEH,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning - I , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[86]  Basil K. Papadopoulos,et al.  Global Image Thresholding Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System Trained with Fuzzy Inclusion and Entropy Measures , 2019, Symmetry.

[87]  Hui Gao,et al.  Methods for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Dombi Hamy Mean Operators , 2018, Symmetry.

[88]  Hui Gao,et al.  Models for competiveness evaluation of tourist destination with some interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Hamy mean operators , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[89]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Probabilistic Linguistic Distance Measures and Their Applications in Multi-criteria Group Decision Making , 2018 .

[90]  Cun Wei,et al.  VIKOR method for financing risk assessment of rural tourism projects under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[91]  Hui Gao,et al.  TODIM method for multiple attribute decision making with 2-tuple linguistic pythagorean fuzzy information , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[92]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Novel hesitant fuzzy linguistic entropy and cross-entropy measures in multiple criteria decision making , 2018, Applied Intelligence.

[93]  Ulas Baran Baloglu,et al.  An Agent‐Based Pythagorean Fuzzy Approach for Demand Analysis with Incomplete Information , 2018, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[94]  Basil K. Papadopoulos,et al.  Local thresholding of degraded or unevenly illuminated documents using fuzzy inclusion and entropy measures , 2019, Evol. Syst..