Neural networks and kernel ridge regression for excited states dynamics of CH2NH 2+ : From single-state to multi-state representations and multi-property machine learning models

Excited-state dynamics simulations are a powerful tool to investigate photo-induced reactions of molecules and materials and provide complementary information to experiments. Since the applicability of these simulation techniques is limited by the costs of the underlying electronic structure calculations, we develop and assess different machine learning models for this task. The machine learning models are trained on {\emph ab initio} calculations for excited electronic states, using the methylenimmonium cation (CH$_2$NH$_2^+$) as a model system. For the prediction of excited-state properties, multiple outputs are desirable, which is straightforward with neural networks but less explored with kernel ridge regression. We overcome this challenge for kernel ridge regression in the case of energy predictions by encoding the electronic states explicitly in the inputs, in addition to the molecular representation. We adopt this strategy also for our neural networks for comparison. Such a state encoding enables not only kernel ridge regression with multiple outputs but leads also to more accurate machine learning models for state-specific properties. An important goal for excited-state machine learning models is their use in dynamics simulations, which needs not only state-specific information but also couplings, i.e., properties involving pairs of states. Accordingly, we investigate the performance of different models for such coupling elements. Furthermore, we explore how combining all properties in a single neural network affects the accuracy. As an ultimate test for our machine learning models, we carry out excited-state dynamics simulations based on the predicted energies, forces and couplings and, thus, show the scopes and possibilities of machine learning for the treatment of electronically excited states.

[1]  Matthias Rupp,et al.  Machine learning for quantum mechanics in a nutshell , 2015 .

[2]  I. Tavernelli,et al.  Non-adiabatic Dynamics Using Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory: assessing the Coupling Strengths , 2009 .

[3]  Julia Westermayr,et al.  Combining SchNet and SHARC: The SchNarc Machine Learning Approach for Excited-State Dynamics , 2020, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[4]  G Reibnegger,et al.  Neural networks as a tool for compact representation of ab initio molecular potential energy surfaces. , 1996, Journal of Molecular Graphics.

[5]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation , 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[6]  Gareth W Richings,et al.  Direct quantum dynamics using variational Gaussian wavepackets and Gaussian process regression. , 2019, The Journal of chemical physics.

[7]  Rampi Ramprasad,et al.  Machine Learning Force Fields: Construction, Validation, and Outlook , 2016, 1610.02098.

[8]  M. Barbatti,et al.  Ultrafast two-step process in the non-adiabatic relaxation of the CH2 molecule , 2006 .

[9]  Scott Habershon,et al.  Direct grid-based quantum dynamics on propagated diabatic potential energy surfaces , 2017 .

[10]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Machine learning of accurate energy-conserving molecular force fields , 2016, Science Advances.

[11]  K-R Müller,et al.  SchNet - A deep learning architecture for molecules and materials. , 2017, The Journal of chemical physics.

[12]  Anders S. Christensen,et al.  Operators in quantum machine learning: Response properties in chemical space. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.

[13]  Zhenwei Li,et al.  Molecular dynamics with on-the-fly machine learning of quantum-mechanical forces. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[14]  G. Pazour,et al.  Ror2 signaling regulates Golgi structure and transport through IFT20 for tumor invasiveness , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[15]  P. Marquetand,et al.  Intersystem Crossing Pathways in the Noncanonical Nucleobase 2-Thiouracil: A Time-Dependent Picture , 2016, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[16]  I. Vass,et al.  Molecular Mechanisms of Light Stress of Photosynthesis , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Daniel W. Davies,et al.  Machine learning for molecular and materials science , 2018, Nature.

[18]  Hua Guo,et al.  Permutation invariant polynomial neural network approach to fitting potential energy surfaces. IV. Coupled diabatic potential energy matrices. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.

[19]  Molecular Dynamics Beyond the Born-Oppenheimer Approximation: Mixed Quantum-Classical Approaches , 2006 .

[20]  Lawrence D. Jackel,et al.  Learning Curves: Asymptotic Values and Rate of Convergence , 1993, NIPS.

[21]  David M G Williams,et al.  Neural network diabatization: A new ansatz for accurate high-dimensional coupled potential energy surfaces. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.

[22]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Quantum-chemical insights from interpretable atomistic neural networks , 2018, Explainable AI.

[23]  D. Yarkony,et al.  Extending the Representation of Multistate Coupled Potential Energy Surfaces to Include Properties Operators Using Neural Networks: Application to the 1,21A States of Ammonia. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[24]  I. Tavernelli,et al.  Nonadiabatic coupling vectors within linear response time-dependent density functional theory. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[25]  Harold A. Scheraga,et al.  Description of the potential energy surface of the water dimer with an artificial neural network , 1997 .

[26]  Heng-Tze Cheng,et al.  Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systems , 2016, DLRS@RecSys.

[27]  E. Wigner On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium , 1932 .

[28]  Zubair Anwar,et al.  Photostability and Photostabilization of Drugs and Drug Products , 2016 .

[29]  Mark N. Gibbs,et al.  Combining ab initio computations, neural networks, and diffusion Monte Carlo: An efficient method to treat weakly bound molecules , 1996 .

[30]  J. Behler First Principles Neural Network Potentials for Reactive Simulations of Large Molecular and Condensed Systems. , 2017, Angewandte Chemie.

[31]  Gerbrand Ceder,et al.  Efficient and accurate machine-learning interpolation of atomic energies in compositions with many species , 2017, 1706.06293.

[32]  Carlos E Crespo-Hernández,et al.  Thymine Dimerization in DNA Is an Ultrafast Photoreaction , 2007, Science.

[33]  R A Mathies,et al.  The first step in vision: femtosecond isomerization of rhodopsin. , 1991, Science.

[34]  Sebastian Ruder,et al.  An Overview of Multi-Task Learning in Deep Neural Networks , 2017, ArXiv.

[35]  Matthias Scheffler,et al.  Nonadiabatic effects in the dissociation of oxygen molecules at the Al(111) surface , 2007, 0704.2202.

[36]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[37]  Karsten Reuter,et al.  Signatures of nonadiabatic O2 dissociation at Al(111): First-principles fewest-switches study , 2009, 0910.0336.

[38]  Deping Hu,et al.  Inclusion of Machine Learning Kernel Ridge Regression Potential Energy Surfaces in On-the-Fly Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics Simulation. , 2018, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[39]  D. Yarkony,et al.  A Quasi-Diabatic Representation of the 1,21A States of Methylamine. , 2019, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[40]  Michael Gastegger,et al.  Machine learning molecular dynamics for the simulation of infrared spectra† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7sc02267k , 2017, Chemical science.

[41]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Neural network models of potential energy surfaces , 1995 .

[42]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  A Numerical Study on Learning Curves in Stochastic Multilayer Feedforward Networks , 1996, Neural Computation.

[43]  Wei-Hai Fang,et al.  Deep Learning for Nonadiabatic Excited-State Dynamics. , 2018, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[44]  Joseph E Subotnik,et al.  Understanding the Surface Hopping View of Electronic Transitions and Decoherence. , 2016, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[45]  I. Tavernelli,et al.  Trajectory surface hopping within linear response time-dependent density-functional theory. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[46]  P. Marquetand,et al.  Nonadiabatic dynamics: The SHARC approach , 2018, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science.

[47]  Thomas B. Blank,et al.  Adaptive, global, extended Kalman filters for training feedforward neural networks , 1994 .

[48]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Machine learning exciton dynamics , 2015, Chemical science.

[49]  Philipp Marquetand,et al.  Cyclobutane Thymine Photodimerization Mechanism Revealed by Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics. , 2016, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[50]  O. Anatole von Lilienfeld,et al.  Quantum Machine Learning in Chemical Compound Space , 2018 .

[51]  J. Tennyson Perspective: Accurate ro-vibrational calculations on small molecules. , 2016, The Journal of chemical physics.

[52]  Hua Guo,et al.  Representation of coupled adiabatic potential energy surfaces using neural network based quasi-diabatic Hamiltonians: 1,2 2A' states of LiFH. , 2019, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[53]  Anders S. Christensen,et al.  Alchemical and structural distribution based representation for universal quantum machine learning. , 2017, The Journal of chemical physics.

[54]  Walter Thiel,et al.  Nonadiabatic Excited-State Dynamics with Machine Learning , 2018, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[55]  Albert Stolow,et al.  Ab initio molecular dynamics and time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy of electronically excited uracil and thymine. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[56]  Nonadiabatic Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics with the Floating Occupation Molecular Orbital-Complete Active Space Configuration Interaction Method. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[57]  K. Müller,et al.  Towards exact molecular dynamics simulations with machine-learned force fields , 2018, Nature Communications.

[58]  Jörg Behler,et al.  Constructing high‐dimensional neural network potentials: A tutorial review , 2015 .

[59]  R. V. Krems,et al.  Bayesian machine learning for quantum molecular dynamics. , 2019, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[60]  W. Domcke,et al.  Peptide deactivation: Spectroscopy meets theory. , 2013, Nature chemistry.

[61]  Julia Westermayr,et al.  Machine learning enables long time scale molecular photodynamics simulations , 2018, Chemical science.

[62]  Scott Habershon,et al.  MCTDH on-the-fly: Efficient grid-based quantum dynamics without pre-computed potential energy surfaces. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.

[63]  Gareth W Richings,et al.  Improved on-the-Fly MCTDH Simulations with Many-Body-Potential Tensor Decomposition and Projection Diabatization. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[64]  D. C. Harris,et al.  Symmetry and spectroscopy : an introduction to vibrational and electronic spectroscopy , 1989 .

[65]  Marco Garavelli,et al.  Initial Excited-State Relaxation of the Isolated 11-cis Protonated Schiff Base of Retinal: Evidence for in-Plane Motion from ab Initio Quantum Chemical Simulation of the Resonance Raman Spectrum , 1999 .

[66]  M. Gastegger,et al.  High-Dimensional Neural Network Potentials for Organic Reactions and an Improved Training Algorithm. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[67]  D. Yarkony,et al.  Neural network based quasi-diabatic Hamiltonians with symmetry adaptation and a correct description of conical intersections. , 2019, The Journal of chemical physics.

[68]  O. Prezhdo,et al.  Chlorine doping reduces electron-hole recombination in lead iodide perovskites: time-domain ab initio analysis. , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[69]  Anders S Christensen,et al.  FCHL revisited: Faster and more accurate quantum machine learning. , 2020, The Journal of chemical physics.

[70]  Kristof T. Schütt,et al.  Unifying machine learning and quantum chemistry with a deep neural network for molecular wavefunctions , 2019, Nature Communications.