Prediction model of tunnel boring machine performance by ensemble neural networks

The penetration rate of a tunnel boring machine (TBM) depends on many factors ranging from the machine design to the geological properties. Therefore it may not be possible to capture this complex relationship in an explicit mathematical expression. In this paper, we propose an ensemble neural network (ENN) to predict TBM performance. Based on site data, a four-parameter ENN model for the prediction of the specific rock mass boreability index is constructed. Such a neural-network-based model has the advantages of taking into account the uncertainties embedded in the site data and making appropriate inferences using very limited data via the re-sampling technique. The ENN-based prediction model is compared with a non-linear regression model derived from the same four parameters. The ENN model outperforms the non-linear regression model.

[1]  Nick Barton,et al.  TBM Tunnelling in Jointed and Faulted Rock , 2000 .

[2]  David S. Touretzky,et al.  Learning with Ensembles: How Over--tting Can Be Useful , 1996 .

[3]  Jian Zhao,et al.  Development of a rock mass characteristics model for TBM penetration rate prediction , 2009 .

[4]  Zhiye Zhao,et al.  Steel columns under fire - a neural network based strength model , 2006, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[5]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[6]  Amund Bruland,et al.  HARD ROCK TUNNEL BORING , 2000 .

[7]  J. E. O'Rourke,et al.  Geotechnical Parameters and Tunnel Boring Machine Performance at Goodwin Tunnel, California , 1994 .

[8]  H. M. Hughes,et al.  The relative cuttability of coal-measures stone , 1986 .

[9]  Anders Krogh,et al.  Learning with ensembles: How overfitting can be useful , 1995, NIPS.

[10]  Qiuming Gong,et al.  Tunnelling through a frequently changing and mixed ground : a case history in Singapore , 2007 .

[11]  Amanda J. C. Sharkey,et al.  Combining Artificial Neural Nets: Ensemble and Modular Multi-Net Systems , 1999 .

[12]  Thomas I. Strasser,et al.  Artificial neural networks for fault detection in large-scale data acquisition systems , 2004, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[13]  Matteo Berti,et al.  TBM performance estimation using rock mass classifications , 2002 .

[14]  R. Ribacchi,et al.  TUNNELLING BY DOUBLE SHIELD TBM IN THE HONG KONG GRANITE , 1995 .

[15]  P. A. Bruines.  The use of neurofuzzy modeling for performance prediction of tunnel boring machines , 2001 .

[16]  Priscilla P. Nelson,et al.  Rock mechanics : models and measurements challenges from industry , 1994 .

[17]  H. Wanner,et al.  Tunnelling Machine Performance In Jointed Rock , 1979 .

[18]  R. Ribacchi,et al.  Influence of Rock Mass Parameters on the Performance of a TBM in a Gneissic Formation (Varzo Tunnel) , 2005 .

[19]  M. Alvarez Grima,et al.  Modeling tunnel boring machine performance by neuro-fuzzy methods , 2000 .

[20]  Qiuming Gong,et al.  In situ TBM penetration tests and rock mass boreability analysis in hard rock tunnels , 2007 .

[21]  Zhiye Zhao,et al.  Design of structural modular neural networks with genetic algorithm , 2003 .

[22]  Michael Alber,et al.  Prediction of Penetration And Utilization For Hard Rock TBMs , 1996 .

[23]  George A. F. Seber,et al.  Linear regression analysis , 1977 .

[24]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[25]  Priscilla P. Nelson,et al.  The Development of Rock Mass Parameters For Use In the Prediction of Tunnel Boring Machine Performance , 1996 .

[26]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[27]  Michael Alber,et al.  Advance rates of hard rock TBMs and their effects on project economics , 2000 .

[28]  N. Innaurato,et al.  Forecasting And Effective TBM Performances In a Rapid Excavation of a Tunnel In Italy , 1991 .

[29]  T. Morimoto,et al.  6. Performance characteristics of a tunnel boring machine from the geomechanical viewpoint , 1986 .