Ultrasound biomicroscopy dark room provocative testing: a quantitative method for estimating anterior chamber angle width.

PURPOSE To describe a quantitative method for measuring the iridocorneal angle recess area, and, using this, to evaluate factors associated with appositional angle-closure during dark room provocative testing using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). METHODS All patients (178 patients, 178 eyes) with clinically narrow angles referred for UBM dark room provocative testing between September 1996 and March 1998 were enrolled in this study. Images of the inferior quadrant of the angle taken under standardized dark and light conditions were analyzed. The angle recess area (ARA) was defined as the triangular area demarcated by the anterior iris surface, corneal endothelium, and a line perpendicular to the corneal endothelium drawn from a point 750 microm anterior to the scleral spur to the iris surface. ARA, and acceleration and gamma-intercept of the linear regression analysis of the ARA were calculated. In the linear regression formula, y = ax + b, the acceleration a describes the rate at which the angle widens from the scleral spur; the y-intercept b describes the distance from the scleral spur to the iris. RESULTS Under dark conditions, the angles in 99 patients (55.6%) showed evidence of appositional angle-closure during testing. ARA (0.11 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.15 +/- 0.05 mm2, P < .0001, Student t-test), acceleration a (0.22 +/- 0.15 vs. 0.26 +/- 0.17, P = .068), and y-intercept b (66 +/- 46 vs. 92 +/- 47 microm, P = .0003) were smaller in eyes that were occluded. In the eyes that were not occluded, y-intercept b showed no significant difference between light and dark conditions (P = .1, paired t-test), while acceleration a did (P < .0001). In the eyes that were occluded, both decreased significantly under dark conditions (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS The ARA linear regression formula provides useful quantitative information about angle recess anatomy. The more posterior the iris insertion on the ciliary face, the less likely the provocative test will be positive.

[1]  J. Wilensky Should patients with anatomically narrow angles have prophylactic iridectomy , 1996 .

[2]  G. Trope,et al.  Monocular blurring. A complication of YAG laser iridotomy. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[3]  F. Foster,et al.  Clinical use of ultrasound biomicroscopy. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[4]  F. Foster,et al.  An ultrasound biomicroscopic dark-room provocative test. , 1995, Ophthalmic surgery.

[5]  M. Wax,et al.  Increased intraocular pressure following neodymium-YAG laser iridectomy. , 1986, A M A Archives of Ophthalmology.

[6]  B. B. Fresco,et al.  Opaque contact lenses for YAG laser iridotomy occlusion. , 1992, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[7]  R. E. Christensen,et al.  Anterior lens capsule perforation and zonular rupture after Nd:YAG laser iridotomy. , 1989, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  I. Constable,et al.  Prevention of corneal burns during high-energy laser iridotomy. , 1981, American journal of ophthalmology-glaucoma.

[9]  M. Sherwood,et al.  Lens-induced endophthalmitis after Nd:YAG laser iridotomy. , 1992, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  M. Drake Neodymium:YAG laser iridotomy. , 1987, Survey of ophthalmology.

[11]  H. Quigley,et al.  Use of the neodymium:YAG laser to create iridotomies in monkeys and humans. , 1984, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[12]  M. Galin,et al.  Prone provocative testing for narrow angle glaucoma. , 1972, Archives of ophthalmology.

[13]  Y. Kitazawa,et al.  [Observation of the chamber angle in primary angle-closure glaucoma with an ultrasound biomicroscope]. , 1995, Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi.

[14]  R. Stein,et al.  Angle-closure glaucoma: following peripheral iridectomy and mydriasis. , 1968, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  J. S. Cohen,et al.  Hypopyon following laser iridotomy. , 1984, Ophthalmic surgery.

[16]  B. Hodes,et al.  Hyphema complicating laser iridotomy. , 1982, Archives of ophthalmology.

[17]  Spaeth Gl,et al.  The normal development of the human anterior chamber angle: a new system of descriptive grading. , 1971 .

[18]  O. Geyer,et al.  Pigmented pupillary pseudomembranes as a complication of argon laser iridotomy. , 1991, Ophthalmic surgery.

[19]  Choplin Nt,et al.  Cystoid macular edema following laser iridotomy. , 1983 .

[20]  H. Quigley Long-term follow-up of laser iridotomy. , 1981, Ophthalmology.

[21]  K. Wilhelmus Corneal edema following argon laser iridotomy. , 1992, Ophthalmic surgery.

[22]  F. Foster,et al.  Ultrasound biomicroscopy of anterior segment structures in normal and glaucomatous eyes. , 1992, American journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  Y. Kitazawa,et al.  Appositional angle closure in eyes with narrow angles: an ultrasound biomicroscopic study. , 1997, Journal of glaucoma.

[24]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Retinal damage from a Q-switched YAG laser. , 1983, American journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  J. Funk,et al.  Perforation rosette of the lens after Nd:YAG laser iridotomy. , 1997, American journal of ophthalmology.

[26]  R. Brown,et al.  Laser iridotomy vs surgical iridectomy. Have the indications changed? , 1985, Archives of ophthalmology.

[27]  R. Ritch,et al.  Ultrasound biomicroscopy in plateau iris syndrome. , 1992, American journal of ophthalmology.

[28]  Gilbert Cm,et al.  Iridotomy using the Q-switched neodymium (Nd):YAG laser. , 1984 .

[29]  L. Laatikainen,et al.  Bilateral nonrhegmatogenous retinal detachment following neodymium-YAG laser iridotomies. , 1986, A M A Archives of Ophthalmology.

[30]  B. Berger Foveal photocoagulation from laser iridotomy. , 1984, Ophthalmology.