Detailed analyses of key phenomena in core disruptive accidents of sodium-cooled fast reactors by the COMPASS code

Abstract A five-year research project has been initiated in 2005 to develop a code based on the MPS (Moving Particle Semi-implicit) method for detailed analysis of key phenomena in core disruptive accidents (CDAs) of sodium-cooled fast reactors (SFRs). The code is named COMPASS (Computer Code with Moving Particle Semi-implicit for Reactor Safety Analysis). The key phenomena include (1) fuel pin failure and disruption, (2) molten pool boiling, (3) melt freezing and blockage formation, (4) duct wall failure, (5) low-energy disruptive core motion, (6) debris-bed coolability, and (7) metal–fuel pin failure. Validation study of COMPASS is progressing for these key phenomena. In this paper, recent COMPASS results of detailed analyses for the several key phenomena are summarized. Simulations of GEYSER and THEFIS experiments were performed for dispersion and freezing behaviors of molten materials in narrow flow channels. In particular, the latter experiment using melt–solid mixture is also related to fundamental behavior of low energy disruptive core. CABRI-TPA2 experiment was simulated for boiling behavior of molten core pool. Expected mechanism of heat transfer between molten fuel and steel mixture was reproduced by the simulation. Analyses of structural dynamics using elastoplastic mechanics and fracture criteria were performed for SCARABEE BE+3 and CABRI E7 experiments. These two analyses are especially focused on thermal and mechanical failure of steel duct wall and fuel pin, respectively. The present results demonstrate COMPASS will be useful to understand and clarify the key phenomena of CDAs in SFRs in details.

[1]  Shengyao Jiang,et al.  Numerical Analyses of Flashing Jet Structure and Droplet Size Characteristics , 2006 .

[2]  Shoji Kotake,et al.  The result of a wall failure in-pile experiment under the EAGLE project , 2007 .

[3]  Yuichi Yamamoto,et al.  Next Generation Safety Analysis Methods for SFRs—(3) Thermal Hydraulics Models of COMPASS Code and Experimental Analyses , 2009 .

[4]  Hidemasa YAMANO,et al.  Experimental Analyses by SIMMER-III on Fuel-Pin Disruption and Low-Energy Disrupted Core Motion , 2010 .

[5]  Yoshiaki Oka,et al.  Numerical analysis of fragmentation mechanisms in vapor explosions , 1999 .

[6]  Takahiro Ito,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Study on Melting Phenomena in Cu-Ag Eutectic System , 2009 .

[7]  Yoshiharu Tobita,et al.  Experimental Analyses by SIMMER-III on Debris-Bed Coolability and Metallic Fuel Freezing Behavior , 2011 .

[8]  Koji Morita,et al.  Thermodynamic properties and equations of state for fast reactor safety analysis: Part I: Analytic equation-of-state model , 1998 .

[9]  Yoshiharu Tobita,et al.  Experimental Analyses by SIMMER-III on Molten Fuel Freezing and Boiling Pool Behavior , 2009 .

[10]  Tatsumi Arima,et al.  Next Generation Safety Analysis Methods for SFRs—(7) Potential Model for Classical Molecular Dynamics on Pu-Fe System , 2009 .

[11]  Yuichi Yamamoto,et al.  Analysis of the Void Distribution in a Circular Tube with the Two-Fluid Particle Interacthion Method , 2001 .

[12]  Yuichi Yamamoto,et al.  R & D of the next generation safety analysis methods for fast reactors with new computational science and technology (6) study of eutectic reaction between metals: FPMD approach , 2008 .

[13]  A. A. Amsden,et al.  The SMAC method: A numerical technique for calculating incompressible fluid flow , 1970 .

[14]  Seiichi KOSHIZUKA,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Jet Injection Behavior for Fuel-Coolant Interaction using Particle Method , 2001 .

[15]  Yuichi Yamamoto,et al.  R&D of the Next Generation Safety Analysis Methods for Fast Reactors With New Computational Science and Technology: 1 — Introduction of the Project and Development of Structural Mechanics Module , 2008 .

[16]  Yasushi Okano,et al.  Analysis of Jet Flows with the Two-Fluid Particle Interaction Method , 2001 .

[17]  Yoshiaki Oka,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Droplet Breakup Behavior using Particle Method , 2001 .

[18]  S. Koshizuka,et al.  Direct simulation of flashing liquid jets using the MPS method , 2006 .

[19]  Tatsumi Arima,et al.  Next Generation Safety Analysis Methods for SFRs—(8) Analyses of Eutectics Between Fuel and Steel in Metal Fuel With FPMD Code VASP , 2009 .

[20]  Shuai Zhang,et al.  Improvement of Basic Fluid Dynamics Models for the COMPASS Code , 2009 .

[21]  Yuichi Yamamoto,et al.  Next Generation Safety Analysis Methods for SFRs—(5) Structural Mechanics Models of COMPASS Code and Verification Analyses , 2009 .

[22]  Seiichi Koshizuka.  Next Generation Safety Analysis Methods for SFRs—(1) Brief Introduction of the Project and Basic Study for Algorithm of Particle Method , 2009 .

[23]  Yoshiharu Tobita,et al.  Transient Heat Transfer Characteristics Between Molten Fuel and Steel with Steel Boiling in the CABRI-TPA2 Test , 2009 .

[24]  Shigenobu Kubo,et al.  Assessment of the FBR Core Disruptive Accident (CDA): The Role and Application of General Behavior Principles (GBPs) , 2002 .

[25]  Ikken Sato,et al.  Fuel Pin Behavior under the Slow Power Ramp Transients in the CABRI-2 Experiments , 2000 .

[26]  Takashi Yabe,et al.  Unified Numerical Procedure for Compressible and Incompressible Fluid , 1991 .

[27]  Yuichi Yamamoto,et al.  Development of a Computational Framework on Fluid-Solid Mixture Flow Simulations for the COMPASS Code , 2010 .

[28]  S. Koshizuka,et al.  Moving-Particle Semi-Implicit Method for Fragmentation of Incompressible Fluid , 1996 .

[29]  Koji Morita,et al.  Thermodynamic properties and equations of state for fast reactor safety analysis: Part II: Properties of fast reactor materials , 1998 .