Nasal Powder Formulations: In-Vitro Characterisation of the Impact of Powders on Nasal Residence Time and Sensory Effects

Nasal drug delivery is still primarily associated with locally-effective drugs, but next-generation products utilising the benefits of nasal administration—such as easy access to a relatively permeable mucosa, the presence of immunocompetent cells, and a direct route to the brain—are under investigation. Nasal powders offer the potential to improve the drugs’ effects by providing higher resistance against the mucociliary clearance, and thus prolonging the contact time of the drug with its target site. However, suitable and easy-to-use in-vitro setups tailored to the characterisation of this effect are missing. In this study, a selection of excipients for powder formulations were used to evaluate the applicability of different methods which investigate the influence on the contact time. The combination of the assessment of rheological properties, dynamic vapour sorption, and adhesiveness on agar–mucin plates was found to be a valuable predictive tool. For the additional assessment of the sensations associated with the close contact of powders and the mucosa, a slug mucosal irritation assay was conducted and adapted to powders. These methods are regarded as being especially useful for comparative screenings in early formulation development.

[1]  Jinbao Liu,et al.  Chitosan Derivatives and Their Application in Biomedicine , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[2]  K. Amighi,et al.  How to characterize a nasal product. The state of the art of in vitro and ex vivo specific methods , 2019, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[3]  P. Russo,et al.  Opportunity and challenges of nasal powders: Drug formulation and delivery , 2017, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[4]  Mengrui Liu,et al.  Progress in brain targeting drug delivery system by nasal route , 2017, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[5]  H. Katsumi,et al.  Nasal drug absorption from powder formulations: The effect of three types of hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) , 2017, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[6]  F. Sonvico,et al.  Nasal powders of thalidomide for local treatment of nose bleeding in persons affected by hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia , 2016, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[7]  Alan B. Watts,et al.  Formulation and device design to increase nose to brain drug delivery , 2016 .

[8]  H. Katsumi,et al.  Nasal Absorption of Macromolecules from Powder Formulations and Effects of Sodium Carboxymethyl Cellulose on Their Absorption , 2016, PloS one.

[9]  Zhenyu Wang,et al.  Development of a physiologically relevant dripping analytical method using simulated nasal mucus for nasal spray formulation analysis☆ , 2016, Journal of pharmaceutical analysis.

[10]  D. Marx,et al.  Intranasal Drug Administration — An Attractive Delivery Route for Some Drugs , 2015 .

[11]  Joana Sousa,et al.  Intranasal delivery of systemic-acting drugs: small-molecules and biomacromolecules. , 2014, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[12]  J. Remon,et al.  The Slug Mucosal Irritation (SMI) assay: a tool for the evaluation of nasal discomfort. , 2013, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[13]  Sabrina Trows Pulverformulierungen für die nasale Vakzinierung , 2013 .

[14]  J. Suman Current understanding of nasal morphology and physiology as a drug delivery target , 2013, Drug Delivery and Translational Research.

[15]  Per Gisle Djupesland,et al.  Nasal drug delivery devices: characteristics and performance in a clinical perspective—a review , 2012, Drug Delivery and Translational Research.

[16]  M. Wahlgren,et al.  Comparison of in vitro methods of measuring mucoadhesion: ellipsometry, tensile strength and rheological measurements. , 2012, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[17]  J. Remon,et al.  New aspects of the Slug Mucosal Irritation assay: predicting nasal stinging, itching and burning sensations , 2011, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[18]  A. Imeson,et al.  Food stabilisers, thickeners and gelling agents. , 2009 .

[19]  S. Bredenberg,et al.  Clinical Study Shows Improved Absorption of Desmopressin with Novel Formulation , 2009, Pharmaceutical Research.

[20]  M. Ryan,et al.  The effect of saline solutions on nasal patency and mucociliary clearance in rhinosinusitis patients , 2007, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[21]  S. Davis,et al.  Evaluation of bioadhesive polymers as delivery systems for nose to brain delivery: in vitro characterisation studies. , 2007, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[22]  S. A. Sande,et al.  In Vitro Measurements of Mucoadhesive Properties of Six Types of Pectin , 2007, Drug development and industrial pharmacy.

[23]  R. Bodmeier,et al.  In situ gelling, bioadhesive nasal inserts for extended drug delivery: in vitro characterization of a new nasal dosage form. , 2006, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[24]  J. Smart The basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. , 2005, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[25]  R. Kinget,et al.  Nasal mucoadhesive drug delivery: background, applications, trends and future perspectives. , 2005, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[26]  Toshikazu Yamaguchi,et al.  Insoluble Powder Formulation as an Effective Nasal Drug Delivery System , 2002, Pharmaceutical Research.

[27]  F. Merkus,et al.  The Nasal Mucociliary Clearance: Relevance to Nasal Drug Delivery , 1991, Pharmaceutical Research.

[28]  H. Hägerström,et al.  Interpretation of mucoadhesive properties of polymer gel preparations using a tensile strength method , 2001, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[29]  I. Tamai,et al.  Improved nasal bioavailability of elcatonin by insoluble powder formulation. , 2001, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[30]  T. Keck,et al.  Temperature Profile in the Nasal Cavity , 2000, The Laryngoscope.

[31]  N. Jones,et al.  The rheology of nasal mucus: a review. , 1998, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[32]  L. Illum,et al.  Chitosan and its use as a pharmaceutical excipient. , 1998, Pharmaceutical research.

[33]  Schipper,et al.  Nasal mucociliary clearance as a factor in nasal drug delivery. , 1998, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[34]  R. Blake,et al.  A clinical trial of hypertonic saline nasal spray in subjects with the common cold or rhinosinusitis. , 1998, Archives of family medicine.

[35]  S. Mortazavi,et al.  An investigation into the role of water movement and mucus gel dehydration in mucoadhesion , 1993 .