Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams

In this study, we examined the effects of temporal coordination on virtual teams supported by an asynchronous communication technology (Lotus Notes). Specifically, we evaluated the moderating role of a temporal coordination mechanism, process structure, on the relationship between conflict management behavior and virtual team performance. An experiment was conducted with 35 five-person teams in the United States and Japan. Our findings show that the way virtual teams manage internal conflict is a crucial factor in their success and that temporal coordination has some significant moderating effects.

[1]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[2]  J. Walther.  Group and Interpersonal Effects in International Computer-Mediated Collaboration , 1997 .

[3]  Steven M. Farmer,et al.  Conflict-Handling Behavior in Work Groups , 1998 .

[4]  R. Baron.  Personality and organizational conflict: Effects of the type a behavior pattern and self-monitoring☆ , 1989 .

[5]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[8]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Getting a Clue , 1996 .

[9]  J. Hunter,et al.  On the Assessment of Unidimensional Measurement: Internal and External Consistency, and Overall Consistency Criteria , 1987 .

[10]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting in a computer supported meeting environment , 1991 .

[11]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[12]  Dennis J. Devine,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Cohesion and Performance , 1995 .

[13]  Michael T. Vanecek,et al.  Dispersed Group Decision Making Using Nonsimultaneous Computer Conferencing: A Report of Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Kevin Biolsi,et al.  Coordination Challenges in a Computer-Supported Meeting Environment , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  J. Forman,et al.  The Group Report: A Problem in Small Group or Writing Processes? , 1986 .

[16]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. , 1982 .

[17]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[18]  J. McGrath.  Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[19]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Models of conflict, negotiation and third party intervention: A review and synthesis. , 1992 .

[20]  D. Robey,et al.  Going Global: Using information technology to advance the competitiveness of the virtual transnational organization , 1998 .

[21]  J. McGrath.  Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[22]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System* , 1997 .

[24]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Distributed Group Support Systems , 1993, MIS Q..

[25]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information Exchange and Use in Group Decision Making: You Can Lead a Group to Information, but You Can't Make It Think , 1996, MIS Q..

[26]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[28]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[29]  K. Thomas.  Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. , 1992 .

[30]  Joseph E. McGrath,et al.  The Experience and Effects of Conflict in Continuing Work Groups , 1993 .

[31]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  The Impact of Group Support Systems on Group Conflict and Conflict Management , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  M. Rahim,et al.  A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. , 1983, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[33]  R. Watson,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Majority Influence , 1998 .

[34]  John e. Jones.  Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument , 1976 .

[35]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[36]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  The Effects of Variations in Capabilities of GDSS Designs on Management of Cognitive Conflict in Groups , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Thomas L. Ruble,et al.  Support for a two-dimensional model of conflict behavior. , 1976 .

[38]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[39]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .

[40]  Paula L. Rechner,et al.  Experiential Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making , 1989 .

[41]  J. Walther.  Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time , 1995 .

[42]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The Effects of Distributed Group Support and Process Structuring on Software Requirements Development Teams: Results on Creativity and Quality , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Stella Ting-Toomey,et al.  The influence of individualism-collectivism and self-monitoring on conflict styles , 1991 .