Studying spatial interactions between sympatric populations of large herbivores: a null model approach
暂无分享,去创建一个
J. Gaillard | C. Calenge | S. Saïd | J. Hamann | E. Richard
[1] B. Krasnov,et al. Aggregative structure is the rule in communities of fleas: null model analysis , 2011 .
[2] J. Gaillard,et al. Habitat use by female western roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): influence of resource availability on habitat selection in two contrasting years. , 2010 .
[3] J. Gaillard,et al. Are abundance indices derived from spotlight counts reliable to monitor red deer Cervus elaphus populations? , 2010 .
[4] François Klein,et al. High red deer density depresses body mass of roe deer fawns , 2010, Oecologia.
[5] Jean-Michel Gaillard,et al. What shapes intra‐specific variation in home range size? A case study of female roe deer , 2009 .
[6] François Klein,et al. Seasonal variation in diet composition and similarity of sympatric red deer Cervus elaphus and roe deer Capreolus capreolus , 2008 .
[7] D. Allainé,et al. Importance of movement constraints in habitat selection studies , 2008 .
[8] Jean-Michel Gaillard,et al. Roe deer Capreolus capreolus home-range sizes estimated from VHF and GPS data , 2008 .
[9] J. Gaillard,et al. Lifetime reproductive success and composition of the home range in a large herbivore. , 2007, Ecology.
[10] Clément Calenge,et al. The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals , 2006 .
[11] Jean-Michel Gaillard,et al. Ecological correlates of home‐range size in spring–summer for female roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a deciduous woodland , 2005 .
[12] JOHN FIEBERG,et al. QUANTIFYING HOME-RANGE OVERLAP: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE UTILIZATION DISTRIBUTION , 2005 .
[13] O. Widmer. The effects of hurricane Lothar on habitat use of roe deer , 2004 .
[14] Thorsten Wiegand,et al. Rings, circles, and null-models for point pattern analysis in ecology , 2004 .
[15] B. Georgii,et al. Home range and activity patterns of male red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in the alps , 1983, Oecologia.
[16] Perturbation analysis of competition and overlap in habitat utilization between Dipodomys ordii and Dipodomys merriami , 1975, Oecologia.
[17] P. Sale. Overlap in resource use, and interspecific competition , 1974, Oecologia.
[18] R. Ricklefs. A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity , 2004 .
[19] Nathalie Pettorelli,et al. AGE AND DENSITY MODIFY THE EFFECTS OF HABITAT QUALITY ON SURVIVAL AND MOVEMENTS OF ROE DEER , 2003 .
[20] J. Kie,et al. Niche partitioning among mule deer, elk, and cattle: Do stable isotopes reflect dietary niche? , 2003 .
[21] J. Gaillard,et al. Sex‐ and age‐dependent effects of population density on life history traits of red deer Cervus elaphus in a temperate forest , 2002 .
[22] B. Johnson,et al. TEMPOROSPATIAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF ELK, MULE DEER, AND CATTLE: RESOURCE PARTITIONING AND COMPETITIVE DISPLACEMENT , 2002 .
[23] H. Verheyden-Tixier,et al. Variations of diet composition of Red Deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in Europe , 2001 .
[24] Nicholas J. Gotelli,et al. Research frontiers in null model analysis , 2001 .
[25] N. Gotelli. Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns , 2000 .
[26] J. Latham. Interspecific interactions of ungulates in European forests: an overview , 1999 .
[27] M. Austin. A silent clash of paradigms : some inconsistencies in community ecology , 1999 .
[28] Stephen H. Roxburgh,et al. The statistical validation of null models used in spatial association analyses , 1999 .
[29] J. L. Hamann,et al. Domaines vitaux diurnes et déplacements de cerfs mâles (Cervus elaphus) sur le secteur de La Petite Pierre (Bas-Rhin) , 1999 .
[30] D. Frank. UNGULATE REGULATION OF ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK : DIRECT AND FEEDBACK EFFECTS , 1998 .
[31] F. Klein,et al. Domaine vital diurne et déplacements de biches (Cervus elaphus) sur le secteur de La Petite Pierre (Bas-Rhin) , 1997 .
[32] N. Gotelli,et al. NULL MODELS IN ECOLOGY , 1996 .
[33] J. Wilson. Null models for assembly rules: the Jack Horner effect is more insidious than the Narcissus effect , 1995 .
[34] Europe.,et al. In Europe … , 1994, Current History.
[35] C. Patrick Doncaster,et al. Non-parametric estimates of interaction from radio-tracking data , 1990 .
[36] B. Worton. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies , 1989 .
[37] D. Catt,et al. Home range use and habitat selection by Red deer (Cerrus elaphus) in a Sitka spruce plantation as determined by radio‐tracking , 1987 .
[38] Daniel Simberloff,et al. Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence , 1984 .
[39] David W. Winkler,et al. 20. A Null Model for Null Models in Biogeography , 1984 .
[40] T. Schoener. The Controversy over Interspecific Competition , 1982 .
[41] Daniel Simberloff,et al. The Assembly of Species Communities: Chance or Competition? , 1979 .
[42] S. Hurlbert. The Measurement of Niche Overlap and Some Relatives , 1978 .
[43] Thomas W. Schoener,et al. Resource Partitioning in Ecological Communities , 1974, Science.
[44] E. Pianka,et al. Niche overlap and diffuse competition. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[45] V. P. W. Lowe,et al. The Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) Population at Kalo and the Factors Regulating Its Size. , 1973 .
[46] Robert K. Colwell,et al. On the Measurement of Niche Breadth and Overlap. , 1971, Ecology.
[47] R. Hoffmann,et al. Habitat Overlap and Competitive Exclusion in Voles (Microtus) , 1968 .
[48] R. Macarthur,et al. COMPETITION, HABITAT SELECTION, AND CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[49] L. Birch,et al. The Meanings of Competition , 1957, The American Naturalist.