Influence of Microstructure on Synchrotron X-ray Diffraction Lattice Strain Measurement Uncertainty

Accurate residual lattice strain measurements are highly dependent upon the precision of the diffraction peak location and the underlying microstructure suitability. The suitability of the microstructure is related to the requirement for valid powder diffraction sampling statistics and the associated number of appropriately orientated illuminated. In this work, these two sources of uncertainty are separated, and a method given for both the quantification of errors associated with insufficient grain sampling statistics and minimization of the total lattice strain measurement uncertainty. It is possible to reduce the total lattice strain measurement uncertainty by leveraging diffraction peak measurements made at multiple azimuthal angles. Lattice strain measurement data acquired during eight synchrotron X-ray diffraction experiments, monochromatic and energy dispersive, has been assessed as per this approach, with microstructural suitability being seen to dominate total measurement uncertainty when the number of illuminated grains was <106. More than half of the studied experimental data fell into this category, with a severe underestimation of total strain measurement uncertainty being possible when microstructural suitability is not considered. To achieve a strain measurement uncertainty under 10−4, approximately 3×105 grains must be within the sampled gauge volume, with this value varying with the multiplicity of the family of lattice planes under study. Where additional azimuthally arrayed data are available an in-plane lattice strain tensor can be extracted. This improves overall strain measurement accuracy and an uncertainty under 10−4 can then be achieved with just 4×104 grains.

[1]  Abdullah Al Mamun,et al.  Microstructure-informed, predictive crystal plasticity finite element model of fatigue-dwells , 2020 .

[2]  P. Withers,et al.  The effect of anisotropic microstructure on the crack growth and fatigue overload behaviour of ultrafine-grained nickel , 2020, Acta Materialia.

[3]  M. Mostafavi,et al.  Measurement of strain evolution in overloaded roller bearings using energy dispersive X-ray diffraction , 2019, Tribology International.

[4]  A. Mamun,et al.  Effect of Plasticity on Creep Deformation in Type 316H Stainless Steel , 2019, Volume 6A: Materials and Fabrication.

[5]  A. Moffat,et al.  Study of the Fracture Toughness in Electron Beam Welds , 2019, Volume 6A: Materials and Fabrication.

[6]  M. M,et al.  Quantifying fatigue overload retardation mechanisms by energy dispersive X-ray diffraction , 2019, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids.

[7]  M. Pavier,et al.  Measurements of Stress During Thermal Shock in Clad Reactor Pressure Vessel Material Using Time-Resolved In-Situ Synchrotron X-Ray Diffraction , 2018, Volume 6B: Materials and Fabrication.

[8]  R. Wimpory,et al.  The NeT Task Group 4 residual stress measurement and analysis round robin on a three-pass slot-welded plate specimen , 2017, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping.

[9]  A. Mamun,et al.  Origin of the Bauschinger effect in a polycrystalline material , 2017 .

[10]  A. W. Ashton,et al.  Processing two-dimensional X-ray diffraction and small-angle scattering data in DAWN 2 , 2017, Journal of applied crystallography.

[11]  Anton S Tremsin,et al.  Time-of-Flight Three Dimensional Neutron Diffraction in Transmission Mode for Mapping Crystal Grain Structures , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[12]  P. Staron,et al.  Locally resolved stress and strain analysis of sinter-joined micro valves using synchrotron X-ray diffraction and conical slit apertures , 2015 .

[13]  Olof Svensson,et al.  Data Analysis WorkbeNch (DAWN) , 2015, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[14]  J. Kelleher,et al.  Determination and mitigation of the uncertainty of neutron diffraction measurements of residual strain in large-grained polycrystalline material , 2015, Journal of applied crystallography.

[15]  P. Withers Synchrotron X-ray Diffraction , 2013 .

[16]  Jérôme Kieffer,et al.  PyFAI, a versatile library for azimuthal regrouping , 2013 .

[17]  M. Rowles On the calculation of the gauge volume size for energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction. , 2011, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[18]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[19]  John Sharples,et al.  Revised Guidance on Residual Stresses in BS7910 , 2011 .

[20]  Carsten Ohms,et al.  Statistical analysis of residual stress determinations using neutron diffraction , 2009 .

[21]  Carsten Ohms,et al.  NET TG1: Residual stress assessment by neutron diffraction and finite element modeling on a single bead weld on a steel plate , 2009 .

[22]  Philip J. Withers,et al.  Methods for obtaining the strain‐free lattice parameter when using diffraction to determine residual stress , 2007 .

[23]  P. Withers,et al.  Introduction to the Characterization of Residual Stress by Neutron Diffraction , 2005 .

[24]  P. Withers,et al.  Neutron diffraction study of stress-induced martensitic transformation and variant change in Fe-Pd , 2003 .

[25]  P. J. Webster,et al.  Optimisation of Data Collection and Processing for Efficient Strain Scanning , 2002 .

[26]  Mark R. Daymond,et al.  The precision of diffraction peak location , 2001 .

[27]  Pajm Steenkamp J R -Curve Testing of Three-Point Bend Specimens by the Unloading Compliance Method , 1988 .