Potential for forest carbon plantings to offset greenhouse emissions in Australia: economics and constraints to implementation

The theoretical potential for carbon forests to off-set greenhouse gas emissions may be high but the achievable rate is influenced by a range of economic and social factors. Economic returns (net present value, NPV) were calculated spatially across the cleared land area in Australia for ‘environmental carbon plantings’. A total of 105 scenarios were run by varying discount rate, carbon price, rate of carbon sequestration and costs for plantation establishment licenses for water interception. The area for which NPV was positive ranged from zero ha for tightly constrained scenarios to almost the whole of the cleared land (104 M ha) for lower discount rate and highest carbon price. For the most plausible assumptions for cost of establishment and commercial discount rate, no areas were identified as profitable until a carbon price of AUD$40 t CO2−1 was reached. The many practical constraints to plantation establishment mean that it will likely take decades to have significant impact on emission reductions. Every 1 M ha of carbon forests established would offset about 1.4 % of Australia’s year 2000 emissions (or 7.4 Mt CO2 year−1) when an average rate of sequestration per ha was reached. All studies that predict large areas of potentially profitable land for carbon forestry need to be tempered by the realities that constrain land use change. In Australia and globally, carbon plantings can be a useful activity to help mitigate emissions and restore landscapes but it should be viewed as a long-term project in which co-benefits such as biodiversity enhancement can be realised.

[1]  Keryn I. Paul,et al.  Predicted change in soil carbon following afforestation or reforestation, and analysis of controlling factors by linking a C accounting model (CAMFor) to models of forest growth (3PG), litter decomposition (GENDEC) and soil C turnover (RothC) , 2003 .

[2]  Davide Geneletti,et al.  Forest landscape restoration in the drylands of Latin America , 2012 .

[3]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  The role of carbon plantations in mitigating climate change: potentials and costs , 2008 .

[4]  P. Polglase,et al.  Calibration of the RothC model to turnover of soil carbon under eucalypts and pines , 2004 .

[5]  M. Weitzman Why the Far-Distant Future Should Be Discounted at Its Lowest Possible Rate , 1998 .

[6]  R. Harper,et al.  Current status and future prospects for carbon forestry in Australia , 2012 .

[7]  M. Battaglia,et al.  An Analysis of greenhouse gas mitigation and carbon biosequestration opportunities from rural land use , 2009 .

[8]  Sten Nilsson,et al.  The carbon-sequestration potential of a global afforestation program , 1995 .

[9]  R. Harper,et al.  The potential of greenhouse sinks to underwrite improved land management , 2007 .

[10]  W. Nordhaus The "Stern Review" on the Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[11]  John O. Carter,et al.  Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , 2001, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  T. Maraseni,et al.  Crops, cows or timber? Including carbon values in land use choices , 2011 .

[13]  C. Potter,et al.  Satellite-derived estimates of potential carbon sequestration through afforestation of agricultural lands in the United States , 2007 .

[14]  P. Polglase,et al.  Economic and employment implications of a carbon market for industrial plantation forestry , 2013 .

[15]  J. Gallant,et al.  A multiresolution index of valley bottom flatness for mapping depositional areas , 2003 .

[16]  David Adamson,et al.  Turning Water into Carbon: Carbon Sequestration and Water Flow in the Murray–Darling Basin , 2011 .

[17]  N. Crossman,et al.  Economic and employment implications of a carbon market for integrated farm forestry and biodiverse environmental plantings , 2013 .

[18]  P. Sands,et al.  Parameterisation of 3-PG for plantation grown Eucalyptus globulus , 2002 .

[19]  Keryn I. Paul,et al.  Change in soil carbon following afforestation , 2002 .

[20]  J. Canadell,et al.  Managing Forests for Climate Change Mitigation , 2008, Science.

[21]  S. Roxburgh,et al.  Improved estimation of biomass accumulation by environmental plantings and mallee plantings using FullCAM , 2013 .

[22]  N. Crossman,et al.  Carbon Payments and Low‐Cost Conservation , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[23]  R. Waring,et al.  A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning , 1997 .

[24]  Keryn I. Paul,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of predicted change in soil carbon following afforestation , 2003 .

[25]  P. Ashworth,et al.  Carbon Farming Initiative: Analysis of submission responses , 2011 .

[26]  Kenneth R. Richards,et al.  A Review of Forest Carbon Sequestration Cost Studies: A Dozen Years of Research , 2004 .

[27]  Lu Zhang,et al.  Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale , 2001 .

[28]  Martin Weitzman,et al.  How Should the Distant Future Be Discounted When Discount Rates are Uncertain? , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[29]  Brendan A Wintle,et al.  Using Carbon Investment to Grow the Biodiversity Bank , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[30]  Auro C. Almeida,et al.  Regional opportunities for agroforestry systems in Australia , 2008 .

[31]  Xiaoquan Zhang,et al.  Mitigation Potential for Carbon Sequestration Through Forestry Activities in Southern and Eastern China , 2001 .

[32]  B. Bryan,et al.  Food-carbon trade-offs between agriculture and reforestation land uses under alternate market-based policies , 2012 .

[33]  P Ekins,et al.  Evidence to Treasury Select Committee ‘Inquiry into Climate change and the Stern review: the implications for HM Treasury policy on tax and the environment’ , 2007 .