Investigating the Use of Movement Kinematics to Assess Perceptual Ambiguity in Virtual Reality

With the emergence of 3D direct-selection interfaces in virtual reality (VR) displays, specialized metrics may be needed to assess the efficiency of these complex interactions. Kinematic movement trajectory analysis, an established technique in experimental psychology, may provide a useful framework for quantifying meaningful patterns of user interaction using the 3D position data recorded by most VR displays. We explored this possibility by investigating the effectiveness of a kinematic approach for identifying ambiguous interface elements in VR by detecting movements initiated toward incorrect target locations (termed “misfires”). Twenty-three participants selected 96 target objects of varying perceptual ambiguity presented in a simple VR environment with limited depth cues. Movement trajectories were recorded and evaluated using a-priori criteria to identify discontinuities consistent with misfire movements. Misfires were observed on 31.6% of trials and occurred significantly more often for movements to perceptually ambiguous targets. The findings of this study suggest that kinematic measures may be useful for quantifying patterns of user interaction in direct-selection VR interfaces.

[1]  Gerd Bruder,et al.  Analysis of direct selection in head-mounted display environments , 2014, 2014 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[2]  Cjh Karin Nieuwenhuizen,et al.  Quantitative analysis of computer interaction movements , 2015 .

[3]  Steve Hansen,et al.  Optimizing rapid aiming behaviour: movement kinematics depend on the cost of corrective modifications , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Chapter 3 – Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth* , 1995 .

[5]  Lawrence E. M. Grierson,et al.  Kinematic analysis of goal-directed aims made against early and late perturbations: an investigation of the relative influence of two online control processes. , 2008, Human movement science.

[6]  E. Muth,et al.  A questionnaire for the assessment of the multiple dimensions of motion sickness. , 2001, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[7]  Ferran Argelaguet,et al.  A survey of 3D object selection techniques for virtual environments , 2013, Comput. Graph..

[8]  Robert J. Teather,et al.  Assessing the Effects of Orientation and Device on (Constrained) 3D Movement Techniques , 2008, 2008 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces.

[9]  Chiuhsiang Joe Lin,et al.  Interaction and visual performance in stereoscopic displays: A review , 2015 .

[10]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Steve Hansen,et al.  Comparing derived and acquired acceleration profiles: 3-D optical electronic data analyses , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[12]  James L. Lyons,et al.  Goal-directed aiming: two components but multiple processes. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.