Inducing chemotactic and haptotactic cues in microfluidic devices for three-dimensional in vitro assays.

Microfluidic devices allow for the production of physiologically relevant cellular microenvironments by including biomimetic hydrogels and generating controlled chemical gradients. During transport, the biomolecules interact in distinct ways with the fibrillar networks: as purely diffusive factors in the soluble fluid or bound to the matrix proteins. These two main mechanisms may regulate distinct cell responses in order to guide their directional migration: caused by the substrate-bound chemoattractant gradient (haptotaxis) or by the gradient established within the soluble fluid (chemotaxis). In this work 3D diffusion experiments, in combination with ELISA assays, are performed using microfluidic platforms in order to quantify the distribution of PDGF-BB and TGF-β1 across collagen and fibrin gels. Furthermore, to gain a deeper understanding of the fundamental processes, the experiments are reproduced by computer simulations based on a reaction-diffusion transport model. This model yields an accurate prediction of the experimental results, confirming that diffusion and binding phenomena are established within the microdevice.

[1]  Francis Lin,et al.  Microfluidic device for studying cell migration in single or co-existing chemical gradients and electric fields. , 2012, Biomicrofluidics.

[2]  H. Asada,et al.  Ensemble Analysis of Angiogenic Growth in Three-Dimensional Microfluidic Cell Cultures , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  Norbert Perrimon,et al.  Signaling mechanisms controlling cell fate and embryonic patterning. , 2012, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[4]  M. Brizzi,et al.  Extracellular matrix, integrins, and growth factors as tailors of the stem cell niche. , 2012, Current opinion in cell biology.

[5]  John T Elliott,et al.  Cell response to matrix mechanics: focus on collagen. , 2009, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[6]  Albrecht Schwab,et al.  Directional Cell Migration and Chemotaxis in Wound Healing Response to PDGF-AA are Coordinated by the Primary Cilium in Fibroblasts , 2010, Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry.

[7]  Gary R. Grotendorst,et al.  Involvement of CTGF in TGF-beta1-stimulation of myofibroblast differentiation and collagen matrix contraction in the presence of mechanical stress. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  A. Einstein Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper , 1905 .

[9]  Shawn P. Carey,et al.  The role of the cytoskeleton in cellular force generation in 2D and 3D environments , 2011, Physical biology.

[10]  N. Ferrara Binding to the Extracellular Matrix and Proteolytic Processing: Two Key Mechanisms Regulating Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Action , 2010, Molecular biology of the cell.

[11]  J. Jespersen,et al.  Fibrin Clot Formation and Lysis: Basic Mechanisms , 2000, Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis.

[12]  Jan Feijen,et al.  A microfluidic wound-healing assay for quantifying endothelial cell migration. , 2010, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[13]  Valerie M. Weaver,et al.  The extracellular matrix at a glance , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[14]  Mikaël M. Martino,et al.  Growth Factors Engineered for Super-Affinity to the Extracellular Matrix Enhance Tissue Healing , 2014, Science.

[15]  J. Alcaraz,et al.  A spectrophotometer-based diffusivity assay reveals that diffusion hindrance of small molecules in extracellular matrix gels used in 3D cultures is dominated by viscous effects. , 2014, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[16]  D. Mooney,et al.  Polymeric system for dual growth factor delivery , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  Microfluidic Platforms for Studies of Angiogenesis, Cell Migration, and Cell–Cell Interactions , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  S. Thibeault,et al.  Response of fibroblasts to transforming growth factor-β1 on two-dimensional and in three-dimensional hyaluronan hydrogels. , 2012, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[19]  J. Weisel,et al.  The mechanical properties of fibrin for basic scientists and clinicians. , 2004, Biophysical chemistry.

[20]  N. Jeon,et al.  Biological applications of microfluidic gradient devices. , 2010, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[21]  T. Seufferlein,et al.  Pancreatic stellate cells promote hapto-migration of cancer cells through collagen I-mediated signalling pathway , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[22]  Woo Y. Lee,et al.  Microfluidic 3D bone tissue model for high-throughput evaluation of wound-healing and infection-preventing biomaterials. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[23]  R. Kamm,et al.  Microfluidic assay for simultaneous culture of multiple cell types on surfaces or within hydrogels , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[24]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  Tumor cell migration in complex microenvironments , 2012, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[25]  F. Greco,et al.  Optimizing design and fabrication of microfluidic devices for cell cultures: An effective approach to control cell microenvironment in three dimensions. , 2014, Biomicrofluidics.

[26]  D. Schuppan,et al.  Type I, II, III, IV, V, and VI Collagens Serve as Extracellular Ligands for the Isoforms of Platelet-derived Growth Factor (AA, BB, and AB)* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  J. Morrow,et al.  The microfluidic palette: a diffusive gradient generator with spatio-temporal control. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[28]  Amit Jain,et al.  Probing cellular mechanobiology in three-dimensional culture with collagen-agarose matrices. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[29]  Francis Lin,et al.  Microfluidic devices for studying chemotaxis and electrotaxis. , 2011, Trends in cell biology.

[30]  Song Li,et al.  Mechanotransduction in endothelial cell migration , 2005, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[31]  Hui Xu,et al.  Microfluidic investigation of BDNF-enhanced neural stem cell chemotaxis in CXCL12 gradients. , 2013, Small.

[32]  L. Liotta,et al.  Signal transduction for chemotaxis and haptotaxis by matrix molecules in tumor cells , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  Jussi Taipale,et al.  Growth factors in the extracellular matrix , 1997, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[34]  Roger D Kamm,et al.  Microfluidic platforms for mechanobiology. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[35]  S. Tóth,et al.  Autocrine and paracrine regulation by cytokines and growth factors in melanoma. , 2000, Cytokine.

[36]  J. D. Wells,et al.  On the transport of compact particles through solutions of chain-polymers , 1973, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[37]  J. Miyake,et al.  Measurement of Biomolecular Diffusion in Extracellular Matrix Condensed by Fibroblasts Using Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy , 2013, PloS one.

[38]  Xu Li,et al.  A perspective on paper-based microfluidics: Current status and future trends. , 2012, Biomicrofluidics.

[39]  B. Hinz,et al.  Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[40]  L. Griffith,et al.  Transport‐mediated angiogenesis in 3D epithelial coculture , 2009, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[41]  Roger D Kamm,et al.  A high-throughput microfluidic assay to study neurite response to growth factor gradients. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[42]  R T Tranquillo,et al.  A fibrin or collagen gel assay for tissue cell chemotaxis: assessment of fibroblast chemotaxis to GRGDSP. , 1999, Experimental cell research.

[43]  Adrian Ranga,et al.  Heparin-binding domain of fibrin(ogen) binds growth factors and promotes tissue repair when incorporated within a synthetic matrix , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  David W. Smith,et al.  On the role of diffusible binding partners in modulating the transport and concentration of proteins in tissues. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[45]  Leslie Y Yeo,et al.  Microfluidic devices for bioapplications. , 2011, Small.

[46]  J. Hollinger,et al.  Regenerative tendon and ligament healing: opportunities with recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor BB-homodimer. , 2012, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[47]  E. Tasheva,et al.  Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Promotes Keratan Sulfate Proteoglycan Expression by Keratocytes in Vitro * , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[48]  Francis Lin,et al.  Differential effects of EGF gradient profiles on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell chemotaxis. , 2004, Experimental cell research.

[49]  Federica Boschetti,et al.  Synergy between interstitial flow and VEGF directs capillary morphogenesis in vitro through a gradient amplification mechanism. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  Pere Roca-Cusachs,et al.  Mechanical guidance of cell migration: lessons from chemotaxis. , 2013, Current opinion in cell biology.

[51]  F. Grinnell,et al.  Fibroblast-collagen-matrix contraction: growth-factor signalling and mechanical loading. , 2000, Trends in cell biology.

[52]  John S. Condeelis,et al.  Chemotaxis in cancer , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[53]  Roger D Kamm,et al.  Sprouting angiogenesis under a chemical gradient regulated by interactions with an endothelial monolayer in a microfluidic platform. , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[54]  F. Lin,et al.  Recent developments in microfluidics-based chemotaxis studies. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[55]  Roeland M. H. Merks,et al.  A Cell-Based Model of Extracellular-Matrix-Guided Endothelial Cell Migration During Angiogenesis , 2013, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[56]  G. Goodhill,et al.  A dual compartment diffusion chamber for studying axonal chemotaxis in 3D collagen , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[57]  J. Jester,et al.  Modulation of cultured corneal keratocyte phenotype by growth factors/cytokines control in vitro contractility and extracellular matrix contraction. , 2003, Experimental eye research.

[58]  Victor K. Lai,et al.  Mechanical behavior of collagen-fibrin co-gels reflects transition from series to parallel interactions with increasing collagen content. , 2012, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[59]  R. Kamm,et al.  Three-dimensional microfluidic model for tumor cell intravasation and endothelial barrier function , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  S. Vukicevic,et al.  Transforming growth factor beta type 1 binds to collagen IV of basement membrane matrix: implications for development. , 1991, Developmental biology.

[61]  G. Schultz,et al.  Immunohistochemical Localization of EGF, TGF-α, TGF-β, and Their Receptors in Rat Corneas During Healing of Excimer Laser Ablation , 2006, Current eye research.

[62]  Salvatore Torquato,et al.  Quantitative characterization of the microstructure and transport properties of biopolymer networks , 2012, Physical biology.

[63]  P. Koolwijk,et al.  Role of Fibrin Matrix in Angiogenesis , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[64]  Sheila MacNeil,et al.  Culture of skin cells in 3D rather than 2D improves their ability to survive exposure to cytotoxic agents. , 2006, Journal of biotechnology.

[65]  R. Diegelmann,et al.  Wound healing: an overview of acute, fibrotic and delayed healing. , 2004, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[66]  M. Lepage,et al.  Diffusion of rhodamine B and bovine serum albumin in fibrin gels seeded with primary endothelial cells. , 2012, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[67]  J. Tarbell,et al.  Macromolecular transport through the deformable porous media of an artery wall. , 1994, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[68]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Random versus directionally persistent cell migration , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.