The new imaging findings

Abstract Case-control studies by examining the lumbar spine computed tomography (CT) findings focusing on the spinous processes. “Passing spine” was defined as a lumbar degenerative change observed on CT images. In contrast, kissing spine, which is also an image finding, has been acknowledged as an established clinical condition. Therefore, we compared the passing spine group and the kissing spine group to investigate whether the 2 groups belong to a similar disease group; this would help explain the clinical and imaging characteristics of patients with passing spine. Previous studies have described the gradual increase in the height and thickness of the lumbar vertebral spinous processes that can occur in individuals aged >40 years, and reported that this progressive degeneration can lead to a condition termed “kissing spine.” We examined the CT imaging of 373 patients with lumbar spinal disease and divided patients into 2 groups, the kissing spine (K) group and the passing spine (P) group, and compared the clinical (age, sex, presence/absence of lower extremity pain) and imaging data (localization of kissing or passing spine, intervertebral disc height at the level of kissing or passing spine, lumbar lordosis (LL) angle, presence/absence of vacuum phenomenon (VP) in the intervertebral discs and spondylolisthesis at the level of kissing or passing spine between the 2 groups. Compared with patients with kissing spine, patients with passing spine had an increased incidence of lower extremity pain, lower intervertebral disc height at the level of passing spine, relatively static LL, and VP commonly observed in the intervertebral discs at the level of passing spine. Because the clinical and imaging characteristics of patients with passing spine are different from those of patients with kissing spine, passing spine might be a pathological condition distinct from kissing spine.

[1]  O. Viswanath,et al.  Extensive Degeneration of Vertebral Body Leading to Baastrup’s Disease: A Radiographic Review of an Image , 2019, Pain and Therapy.

[2]  M. Suter,et al.  The steps until surgery in the management of Baastrup’s Disease (kissing spine syndrome) , 2019, Journal of surgical case reports.

[3]  Keewon Kim,et al.  The relationships between low back pain and lumbar lordosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[4]  R. Tubbs,et al.  Baastrup's Disease: A Comprehensive Review of the Extant Literature. , 2017, World neurosurgery.

[5]  Kazuhisa Takahashi,et al.  Baastrup's Disease Is Associated with Recurrent of Sciatica after Posterior Lumbar Spinal Decompressions Utilizing Floating Spinous Process Procedures , 2016, Asian spine journal.

[6]  N. Kelekis,et al.  Baastrup’s disease (kissing spines syndrome): a pictorial review , 2015, Insights into Imaging.

[7]  Carolyn J. Sparrey,et al.  Etiology of lumbar lordosis and its pathophysiology: a review of the evolution of lumbar lordosis, and the mechanics and biology of lumbar degeneration. , 2014, Neurosurgical focus.

[8]  Toshihiko Sakakibara,et al.  An increase in height of spinous process is associated with decreased heights of intervertebral disc and vertebral body in the degenerative process of lumbar spine , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[9]  Cameron Walker,et al.  Spinous process morphology: the effect of ageing through adulthood on spinous process size and relationship to sagittal alignment , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[10]  Y. Kwong,et al.  MDCT findings in Baastrup disease: disease or normal feature of the aging spine? , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  T. Hansson,et al.  The narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal during loaded MRI: the effects of the disc and ligamentum flavum , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[12]  J. Carrino,et al.  Lumbar Interspinous Bursitis (Baastrup Disease) in a Symptomatic Population: Prevalence on Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, Spine.

[13]  S. Yerby,et al.  The Effect of an Interspinous Process Implant on Facet Loading During Extension , 2005, Spine.

[14]  R. Scapinelli Morphological and functional changes of the lumbar spinous processes in the elderly , 2005, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[15]  Thomas R Oxland,et al.  Degenerative mechanics of the lumbar spine. , 2004, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[16]  V. Haughton,et al.  Morphologic Changes in the Lumbar Intervertebral Foramen Due to Flexion-Extension, Lateral Bending, and Axial Rotation: An In Vitro Anatomic and Biomechanical Study , 2001, Spine.

[17]  S. Chung,et al.  Effect of low back posture on the morphology of the spinal canal , 2000, Skeletal Radiology.

[18]  S. Wildermuth,et al.  Changes in cross-sectional measurements of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramina as a function of body position: in vivo studies on an open-configuration MR system. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  T. Hansson,et al.  Dynamic Effects on the Lumbar Spinal Canal: Axially Loaded CT‐Myelography and MRI in Patients With Sciatica and/or Neurogenic Claudication , 1997, Spine.

[20]  V. Haughton,et al.  Anatomic Changes of the Spinal Canal and Intervertebral Foramen Associated With Flexion‐Extension Movement , 1996, Spine.

[21]  D. Perugia,et al.  Ligamenta Flava in Lumbar Disc Herniation and Spinal Stenosis: Light and Electron Microscopic Morphology , 1994, Spine.

[22]  C. I. Baastrup On the Spinous Processes of the Lumbar Vertebrae and the Soft Tissues Between them, and on Pathological Changes in that Region , 1933 .

[23]  J. Brailsford Deformities of the lumbosacral region of the spine , 1929 .