Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

BackgroundThe International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was published by the World Health Organization (WHO) to standardize descriptions of health and disability. Little is known about the reliability and clinical relevance of measurements using the ICF and its qualifiers. This study examines the test-retest reliability of ICF codes, and the rate of immeasurability in long-term care settings of the elderly to evaluate the clinical applicability of the ICF and its qualifiers, and the ICF checklist.MethodsReliability of 85 body function (BF) items and 152 activity and participation (AP) items of the ICF was studied using a test-retest procedure with a sample of 742 elderly persons from 59 institutional and at home care service centers. Test-retest reliability was estimated using the weighted kappa statistic. The clinical relevance of the ICF was estimated by calculating immeasurability rate. The effect of the measurement settings and evaluators' experience was analyzed by stratification of these variables. The properties of each item were evaluated using both the kappa statistic and immeasurability rate to assess the clinical applicability of WHO's ICF checklist in the elderly care setting.ResultsThe median of the weighted kappa statistics of 85 BF and 152 AP items were 0.46 and 0.55 respectively. The reproducibility statistics improved when the measurements were performed by experienced evaluators. Some chapters such as genitourinary and reproductive functions in the BF domain and major life area in the AP domain contained more items with lower test-retest reliability measures and rated as immeasurable than in the other chapters. Some items in the ICF checklist were rated as unreliable and immeasurable.ConclusionThe reliability of the ICF codes when measured with the current ICF qualifiers is relatively low. The result in increase in reliability according to evaluators' experience suggests proper education will have positive effects to raise the reliability. The ICF checklist contains some items that are difficult to be applied in the geriatric care settings. The improvements should be achieved by selecting the most relevant items for each measurement and by developing appropriate qualifiers for each code according to the interest of the users.

[1]  R. Imrie.  Demystifying disability: a review of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. , 2004, Sociology of health & illness.

[2]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[3]  T. Bedirhan Üstün,et al.  Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[4]  H. Feldman,et al.  Inter-rater reliability in assigning ICF codes to children with disabilities , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[5]  T. Ostermann,et al.  Role of religion and spirituality in medical patients: Confirmatory results with the SpREUK questionnaire , 2005, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[6]  J. McDougall,et al.  Measuring chronic health condition and disability as distinct concepts in national surveys of school-aged children in Canada: a comprehensive review with recommendations based on the ICD-10 and ICF , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[7]  C. Sykes,et al.  The ICF as a framework for national data: the introduction of ICF into Australian data dictionaries , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[8]  Eva Beckung Pt,et al.  Neuroimpairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions in children with cerebral palsy , 2002 .

[9]  S. Chatterji,et al.  Identification of the most common patient problems in patients with chronic conditions using the ICF checklist. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[10]  J. Desrosiers,et al.  Measuring social participation: reliability of the LIFE-H in older adults with disabilities , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[11]  A. Cieza,et al.  Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on depressive disorders using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[12]  M. T. J. Buñuales,et al.  La clasificación internacional del funcionamiento de la discapacidad y de la salud (CIF) 2001 , 2002 .

[13]  A. Vansant,et al.  The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. , 2006, Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association.

[14]  Eva Beckung,et al.  Neuroimpairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions in children with cerebral palsy. , 2002, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[15]  Stephanie Nixon,et al.  Impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions: Prevalence and associations among persons living with HIV/AIDS in British Columbia , 2004, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[16]  S. Newman.  Commentary on Supplement 44: G. ICF core sets for chronic conditions. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[17]  Takako Tsutsui,et al.  Care‐Needs Certification in the Long‐Term Care Insurance System of Japan , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[18]  M. Leonardi,et al.  Applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to measure childhood disability , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[19]  Emanuela Russo,et al.  International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in a cohort of children with cognitive, motor, and complex disabilities , 2004, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[20]  T. B. Üstün,et al.  The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[21]  D. Uebelhart,et al.  Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[22]  Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on four internal disorders using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference. , 2004 .

[23]  Diana Meeks-Sjostrom.  A comparison of three measures of elder abuse. , 2004, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[24]  Somnath Chatterji,et al.  WHO's ICF and Functional Status Information in Health Records , 2003, Health care financing review.

[25]  S. Matsuda.  The health and social system for the aged in Japan , 2002, Aging clinical and experimental research.

[26]  A. Jette,et al.  Are the ICF Activity and Participation dimensions distinct? , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[27]  B. Griffiths,et al.  Issues in cross-cultural validity: example from the adaptation, reliability, and validity testing of a Turkish version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[28]  Y. Heerkens,et al.  Past and future use of the ICF (former ICIDH) by nursing and allied health professionals , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[29]  Thomas Ewert,et al.  RETRACTED: Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[30]  R. Hays,et al.  Improving task comprehension in the measurement of health state preferences. A trial of informational cartoon figures and a paired-comparison task. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[31]  A. Chorus,et al.  Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[32]  S. Matsuda,et al.  Reliability of a geriatric assessment instrument with illustrations , 2005 .

[33]  S. Walter,et al.  Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.