Perspectives on stakeholder participation in the design of economic experiments for agricultural policymaking: Pros, cons, and twelve recommendations for researchers

[1]  R. Siebert,et al.  Co-design approaches in land use related sustainability science – A systematic review , 2023, Land Use Policy.

[2]  T. Friede,et al.  Improving the statistical power of economic experiments using adaptive designs , 2022, Experimental Economics.

[3]  Frank Wätzold,et al.  Co‐design: Working with farmers in Europe to halt the loss of biological diversity , 2022, Ecological Solutions and Evidence.

[4]  O. Musshoff,et al.  How (un)informative are experiments with students for other social groups? A study of agricultural students and farmers , 2022, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

[5]  B. Hasler,et al.  European Agri-environmental Policy: Evolution, Effectiveness, and Challenges , 2022, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[6]  Ben S. Meiselman,et al.  Conservation outreach that acknowledges human contributions to climate change does not inhibit action by U.S. farmers: Evidence from a large randomized controlled trial embedded in a federal program on soil health , 2021, PloS one.

[7]  I. Azevedo,et al.  Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5° and 2°C climate change targets , 2020, Science.

[8]  S. R. Skorbiansky,et al.  Barriers to Using Economic Experiments in Evidence‐Based Agricultural Policymaking , 2020 .

[9]  J. Spangenberg,et al.  The Objectives of Stakeholder Involvement in Transdisciplinary Research. A Conceptual Framework for a Reflective and Reflexive Practise , 2020 .

[10]  P. Ferraro,et al.  Challenges in Recruiting U.S. Farmers for Policy‐Relevant Economic Field Experiments , 2020 .

[11]  Ulrich B. Morawetz,et al.  Randomised Controlled Trials for the Evaluation of the CAP: Empirical Evidence about Acceptance by Farmers , 2020 .

[12]  Malte Müller.  Leadership in agricultural machinery circles: experimental evidence from Tajikistan , 2020 .

[13]  Stefano DellaVigna,et al.  Predict science to improve science , 2019, Science.

[14]  René van Bavel,et al.  Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a policy-oriented review , 2019, European Review of Agricultural Economics.

[15]  M. Lefebvre,et al.  Greening the common agricultural policy: a behavioural perspective and lab-in-the-field experiment in Germany , 2019, European Review of Agricultural Economics.

[16]  Kent D. Messer,et al.  Behavioral and Experimental Agri-Environmental Research: Methodological Challenges, Literature Gaps, and Recommendations , 2019, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[17]  Emma Blomkamp.  The Promise of Co-Design for Public Policy 1 , 2018, Routledge Handbook of Policy Design.

[18]  Steven Y. Wu,et al.  Subject Pools and Deception in Agricultural and Resource Economics Experiments , 2018, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[19]  R. Finger,et al.  Using involvement to reduce inconsistencies in risk preference elicitation , 2018 .

[20]  Sergio Gomez y Paloma,et al.  Economic experiments as a tool for agricultural policy evaluation: insights from the European CAP , 2016 .

[21]  J. Spangenberg,et al.  Stakeholder involvement in ESS research and governance: Between conceptual ambition and practical experiences – risks, challenges and tested tools , 2015 .

[22]  Peter M. Howley,et al.  The Happy Farmer: The Effect of Nonpecuniary Benefits on Behavior , 2015 .

[23]  Andreas Neef,et al.  Stakeholder participation in agricultural research projects: a conceptual framework for reflection and decision-making , 2011 .

[24]  G. Harrison,et al.  Field experiments , 1924, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[25]  V. Smith.  Experimental Economics : Induced Value Theory , 2007 .