Interactions between ego- and allocentric neuronal representations of space

In the primate brain, visual spatial representations express distances of objects with regard to different references. In the parietal cortex, distances are thought to be represented with respect to the body (egocentric representation) and in superior temporal cortices with respect to other objects, independent of the observer (allocentric representation). However, these representations of space are interdependent, complicating such distinctions. Specifically, an object's position within a background frame strongly biases egocentric position location judgments. This bias, however, is absent for pointing movements towards that same object. More recent theories state that dorsal parietal spatial representations subserve visuomotor processing, whereas temporal lobe representations subserve memory and cognition. Therefore, it may be hypothesized that parietal egocentric representations, responsible for movement control, are not influenced by irrelevant allocentric cues, whereas ventral representations are. In an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study, subjects judged target bar locations relative to their body (egocentric task) or a background bar (allocentric task). Activity in the superior parietal lobule (SPL) was shown to increase during egocentric judgments, but not during allocentric judgments. The superior temporal gyrus (STG) shows a negative BOLD response during allocentric judgments and no activation during egocentric judgments. During egocentric judgments, the irrelevant background influenced activity in the posterior commissure and the medial temporal gyrus. SPL activity was unaffected by the irrelevant background during egocentric judgments. Sensitivity to spatial perceptual biases is apparently limited to occipito-temporal areas, subserving the observed biased cognitive reports of location, and is not found in parietal areas, subserving unbiased goal-directed actions.

[1]  A. Berthoz,et al.  The neural basis of egocentric and allocentric coding of space in humans: a functional magnetic resonance study , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  C. O. Roelofs,et al.  Die optische Lokalisation. , 1935 .

[3]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of cell discharge. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  T. Vilis,et al.  Integration of target and effector information in human posterior parietal cortex for the planning of action. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  FMRI evidence for a 'parietal reach region' in the human brain , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  B. Stein,et al.  Spatial factors determine the activity of multisensory neurons in cat superior colliculus , 1986, Brain Research.

[7]  Albert Postma,et al.  Quantifying the interactions between allo- and egocentric representations of space. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[8]  A M Dale,et al.  Event-related functional MRI: past, present, and future. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  The induced Roelofs effect: two visual systems or the shift of a single reference frame? , 2004, Vision Research.

[10]  Robin Walker,et al.  Spatial and object-based neglect , 1995 .

[11]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Are the original Roelofs effect and the induced Roelofs effect caused by the same shift in straight ahead? , 2002, Vision Research.

[12]  B. Stein,et al.  Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  J L Lancaster,et al.  Automated Talairach Atlas labels for functional brain mapping , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[14]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[15]  R. Turner,et al.  Detecting Latency Differences in Event-Related BOLD Responses: Application to Words versus Nonwords and Initial versus Repeated Face Presentations , 2002, NeuroImage.

[16]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Anatomical and functional MR imaging in the macaque monkey using a vertical large-bore 7 Tesla setup. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[17]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Attention to within-object and between-object spatial representations: multiple sites for visual selection , 1994 .

[18]  Alwyn C. Scott,et al.  Towards a Science of Consciousness , 1996 .

[19]  Nick F Ramsey,et al.  Brain activation related to retrosaccades in saccade experiments , 2005, Neuroreport.

[20]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Processing spatial information in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system , 2000, Vision Research.

[21]  E. Rolls Spatial view cells and the representation of place in the primate hippocampus , 1999, Hippocampus.

[22]  S. McKee,et al.  Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Differential Effects of Viewpoint on Object-Driven Activation in Dorsal and Ventral Streams , 2002, Neuron.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Characterizing Stimulus–Response Functions Using Nonlinear Regressors in Parametric fMRI Experiments , 1998, NeuroImage.

[25]  Paul Cisek,et al.  Modest gaze-related discharge modulation in monkey dorsal premotor cortex during a reaching task performed with free fixation. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  J. O’Keefe Place units in the hippocampus of the freely moving rat , 1976, Experimental Neurology.

[27]  K. D. Singh,et al.  Negative BOLD in the visual cortex: Evidence against blood stealing , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[28]  F. Duffy,et al.  Eye movement-related inhibition of primate visual neurons , 1975, Brain Research.

[29]  E. Rolls,et al.  Spatial view cells in the primate hippocampus: allocentric view not head direction or eye position or place. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  G. Ojemann,et al.  Neuronal activity in human lateral temporal cortex during serial retrieval from short-term memory , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[31]  R. Andersen Encoding of intention and spatial location in the posterior parietal cortex. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Sustained Mnemonic Response in the Human Middle Frontal Gyrus during On-Line Storage of Spatial Memoranda , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Cerebral cortical mechanisms of reaching movements. , 1992, Science.

[35]  G. Vallar Spatial hemineglect in humans , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  A. Shmuel,et al.  Sustained Negative BOLD, Blood Flow and Oxygen Consumption Response and Its Coupling to the Positive Response in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[37]  D. Weinberger,et al.  Three-dimensional functional magnetic resonance imaging of human brain on a clinical 1.5-T scanner. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  R Tissot,et al.  Qualitative analysis of unilateral spatial neglect in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions , 1972, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[39]  Jon Driver,et al.  Egocentric and object-based visual neglect , 1998 .

[40]  H. Karnath,et al.  Trunk orientation as the determining factor of the 'contralateral' deficit in the neglect syndrome and as the physical anchor of the internal representation of body orientation in space. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[42]  A M Dale,et al.  Randomized event‐related experimental designs allow for extremely rapid presentation rates using functional MRI , 1998, Neuroreport.

[43]  H. E. Rosvold,et al.  Analysis of the delayed-alternation deficit produced by dorsolateral prefrontal lesions in the rhesus monkey. , 1971, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[44]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[45]  Jack L. Lancaster,et al.  The Talairach Daemon a database server for talairach atlas labels , 1997 .

[46]  Albert Postma,et al.  Egocentric and Exocentric Spatial Judgements of Visual Displacement , 1999 .

[47]  M Jeannerod,et al.  Visual pathways for object-oriented action and object recognition: functional anatomy with PET. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  Guoying Liu,et al.  Fast echo‐shifted gradient‐recalled MRI: Combining a short repetition time with variable T2* weighting , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[49]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  Albert Postma,et al.  Frontal-Lobe Involvement in Spatial Memory: Evidence from PET, fMRI, and Lesion Studies , 2000, Neuropsychology Review.

[51]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Two basic properties of space representation in the brain: evidence from unilateral neglect. , 1985, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[52]  R. Turner,et al.  Characterizing Evoked Hemodynamics with fMRI , 1995, NeuroImage.

[53]  J. O'Keefe,et al.  The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. , 1971, Brain research.

[54]  Paul Dassonville,et al.  Perception, Action, and Roelofs Effect: A Mere Illusion of Dissociation , 2004, PLoS biology.

[55]  N. Ramsey,et al.  Phase Navigator Correction in 3D fMRI Improves Detection of Brain Activation: Quantitative Assessment with a Graded Motor Activation Procedure , 1998, NeuroImage.

[56]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Activation of human prefrontal cortex during spatial and nonspatial working memory tasks measured by functional MRI. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[57]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[58]  D P Carey,et al.  Eye–hand coordination: Eye to hand or hand to eye? , 2000, Current Biology.