Effects of age and sequence presentation rate on temporal order recognition.

The experiments examined the ability of younger and older listeners to identify the temporal order of sounds presented in tonal sequences. The stimuli were three-tone sequences that spanned two-octave frequency range, and listeners identified random permutations of tone order using labels of relative pitch. Some of the sequences featured uniform timing characteristics, and the sequence duty cycle was varied across conditions to examine the relative influence of tonal durations and intertone interval on recognition performance across a range of sequence presentation rates. Other stimulus sequences featured nonuniform timing with unequal tone durations and intertone intervals. The listeners were groups of younger and older persons with or without hearing loss. Results indicated that temporal order recognition was influenced primarily by sequence presentation rate, independent of tonal duration, tonal interval spacing, or sequence timing characteristics. The performance of older listeners was poorer than younger listeners, but the age-related recognition differences were independent of sequence presentation rate. There were no consistent effects of hearing loss on temporal ordering performance.

[1]  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Effect of age on detection of gaps in speech and nonspeech markers varying in duration and spectral symmetry. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  L. Humes Do ‘Auditory Processing’ Tests Measure Auditory Processing in the Elderly? , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[3]  Sandra Gordon-Salant,et al.  Age effects on discrimination of timing in auditory sequences. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  R. Frisina,et al.  Age reduces response latency of mouse inferior colliculus neurons to AM sounds. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Jennifer J. Lister,et al.  Effect of age on silent gap discrimination in synthetic speech stimuli. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[6]  Joan Besing,et al.  Effects of age and frequency disparity on gap discrimination. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. Grose,et al.  Gap Duration Discrimination in Listeners with Cochlear Hearing Loss: Effects of Gap and Marker Duration, Frequency Separation, and Mode of Presentation , 2001, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[8]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Regaining lost time: adult aging and the effect of time restoration on recall of time-compressed speech. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[9]  B Schneider,et al.  Age-related changes in temporal resolution: envelope and intensity effects. , 1998, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[10]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Auditory temporal order perception in younger and older adults. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[11]  P. Tun Fast noisy speech: age differences in processing rapid speech with background noise. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[12]  T Letowski,et al.  Effects of age, speech rate, and type of test on temporal auditory processing. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[13]  K. Snell,et al.  Age-related changes in temporal gap detection. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  T. Salthouse The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[15]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Age effects on duration discrimination with simple and complex stimuli. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  B A Schneider,et al.  Gap detection and the precedence effect in young and old adults. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[18]  L E Humes,et al.  Speech identification difficulties of hearing-impaired elderly persons: the contributions of auditory processing deficits. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  S. Gelfand,et al.  Acoustic reflex thresholds in normal and cochlear-impaired ears: effects of no-response rates on 90th percentiles in a large sample. , 1990, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[20]  S E Trehub,et al.  Aging and auditory temporal sequencing: Ordering the elements of repeating tone patterns , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Speed of processing in normal aging: effects of speech rate, linguistic structure, and processing time. , 1985, Journal of gerontology.

[22]  E. Pfeiffer A Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire for the Assessment of Organic Brain Deficit in Elderly Patients † , 1975, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[23]  I J Hirsh,et al.  Identification of temporal order in three-tone sequences. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Richard M. Warren,et al.  Auditory temporal discrimination by trained listeners , 1974 .

[25]  D. Aaronson,et al.  Perception and immediate recall of normal and “compressed” auditory sequences , 1971 .

[26]  R. Peters Perceived Order of Tone Pulses , 1964 .

[27]  B. Schneider,et al.  Implications of perceptual deterioration for cognitive aging research. , 2000 .

[28]  P W Alberti,et al.  Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, Scandinavian audiology.