Performance Near Operational Boundaries

The performance of ELMy H-mode operation in ASDEX Upgrade and JET is compared. Special attention is paid to variations (usually reductions) in this performance near the operational limits which will need to be approached in a next-step device. In JET it is found that input powers substantially above the H-mode threshold power are required to obtain discharges with energy confinement enhancement factors at or above the usual ELMy H-mode scalings. Such a margin (as much as a factor of two in JET) is not observed in ASDEX Upgrade. It is proposed that this difference may be due to the higher edge collisionality in ASDEX and the results are compared to a recent theory based on interchange instabilities and magnetic flutter. In ASDEX Upgrade, the confinement in type I ELMy discharges degrades as the density is raised due to a stiffness of the temperature profiles which leads to a degradation of the core confinement. This type of stiffness is observed in JET only at relatively high edge densities. In JET, the edge confinement degrades as the density is increased by external gas fuelling, consistent with a constant edge pressure gradient and an edge barrier width which reduces in proportion to the edge ion poloidal Larmor radius. In both machines, H-mode performance is limited at high density by a transition first to the type III ELM regime and then to the L-mode. The confinement penalty, relative to good type I ELM discharges, of operating with type III ELMs is about 25-30%. The maximum densities for operation with type I or type III ELMs can be substantially increased by increasing the plasma triangularity in both machines.

[1]  Troppmann,et al.  Observation of continuous divertor detachment in H-mode discharges in ASDEX upgrade. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[2]  Iter Confinement Database Energy confinement scaling and the extrapolation to ITER , 1997 .

[3]  Itoh Model of L- to H-mode transition in tokamak. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[4]  J. Cordey,et al.  Edge localized modes and edge pedestal in NBI and ICRF heated H, D and T plasmas in JET , 1999 .

[5]  S. Wolfe,et al.  A new look at density limits in tokamaks , 1988 .

[6]  Y. Martin Threshold power and energy confinement for ITER , 1997 .

[7]  A. Taroni,et al.  CORRIGENDUM: The influence of isotope mass, edge magnetic shear and input power on high density ELMy H modes in JET , 1999 .

[8]  Influence of Beam Heating Deposition Profiles on the Transport of ASDEX Upgrade Plasmas , 1999 .

[9]  A. Taroni,et al.  Energy and particle transport modelling with a time dependent combined core and edge transport code , 1997 .

[10]  J. Lingertat,et al.  Fast particles and the edge transport barrier , 1999 .

[11]  Timothy Goodman,et al.  Overview of ASDEX Upgrade results , 1999 .

[12]  W. A. Peebles,et al.  Modifications in turbulence and edge electric fields at the L–H transition in the DIII‐D tokamak , 1991 .

[13]  H. Zohm,et al.  Identification of plasma-edge-related operational regime boundaries and the effect of edge instability on confinement in ASDEX Upgrade , 1997 .

[14]  G. Saibene,et al.  Interpretation of density limits and the H-mode operational diagram through similarity parameters for edge transport mechanisms , 1999 .

[15]  E. C. Crume,et al.  Bifurcation theory of poloidal rotation in tokamaks: A model for L-H transition. , 1989, Physical review letters.