Performance analysis of propagation models in different terrain conditions for IEEE standard 802.16e WiMAX

To fulfill the end-users demand for access to the Internet “anywhere-anytime” and ensure quality of service, is the WiMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access) technology standardized based on IEEE 802.16 that provides efficient packet radio interface enabling transmission of high data rates. WiMAX network became popular and receives growing acceptance as a Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) system which is the solution of “last mile” wireless broadband. WiMAX has potential success and is gaining hike all over the world for deployment of the network in its line-of-sight (LOS) and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) conditions for both fixed operation below 11GHz and Mobile operation below 6 GHz frequency range. In the first step of cell planning and deployment of wireless network, estimation of path loss is very important in turn to get better signal strength to access Internet. In this work, we have used well-structured propagation models for analysis and comparison at different terrain areas, the models are - COST231 Hata model, COST231 Walfisch-Ikegami model, ECC-33 model, Ericsson model, and SUI model for SIMO (Single-input Multiple-output) channels. Using environmental parameters and some correction factors path loss is calculated for all terrain (urban, suburban, and rural) conditions. This provides guidelines for cell planning of mobile WiMAX at cellular frequency between 2-6 GHz.

[1]  Giselle M. Galván-Tejada WiMAX urban coverage based on the Lee model and the Deygout diffraction method , 2010, 2010 7th International Conference on Electrical Engineering Computing Science and Automatic Control.

[2]  Elma Avdic,et al.  A novel approach for evaluating applicability of existing empirical propagation models to coverage planning in 3.5 GHz WiMAX systems , 2011, 2011 18th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing.

[3]  P. D. Katev Propagation models for WiMAX at 3.5 GHz , 2012, 2012 ELEKTRO.

[4]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Fundamentals of WiMAX: Understanding Broadband Wireless Networking , 2007 .

[5]  Hamid Sharif,et al.  A Performance Comparison of Mobile WiMAX Spectrums: 2.5 GHz vs. 3.65 GHz , 2012, 2012 IEEE 75th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[6]  N. Behlilovic,et al.  Applicability evaluation of Okumura, Ericsson 9999 and winner propagation models for coverage planning in 3.5 GHZ WiMAX systems , 2012, 2012 19th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP).