Investigating the Potential of the Flipped Classroom Model in K-12 ICT Teaching and Learning: An Action Research Study

Introduction Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) curricula are a core priority of educational policies worldwide, for cultivating students' diverse digital competences (Commonwealth of Australia, 2010; US Department of Education, 2010; Eurydice, 2012). These digital competences are considered a core strand of the 21st century skillset and industry work-force requirements are shifted towards attaining and exploiting such competences (OECD, 2014). Thus, ICT educational curricula have been increasingly required to effectively cultivate student digital competences by promoting more student-centred teaching approaches (e.g., Balanskat & Engelhardt, 2015). For example, the project-based approach has been positively evaluated in the context of K-12 education as a promising method to effectively engage students in the learning process and to develop their digital competences (e.g., Wang et al., 2016; Tsai et al., 2015). Furthermore, on top of exploiting such student-centered teaching approaches, educational innovations such as the Flipped Classroom Model (FCM) have also been studied for improving learning experiences and competences. The FCM has been proposed as a method to maximize the use of teacher-supported face-to-face classroom-based sessions towards delivering hands-on activities and individual scaffolding. To achieve this, it opts for substituting the traditional teachers' lecture with appropriately designed educational resources which can be engaged by the student in an autonomous manner (Bergmann & Sams, 2012). The FCM has received a growing level of research attention given the promising results that showcase its capacity to enhance teaching practice and deliver (among others) better students' cognitive learning outcomes and motivation in a wide range of subjects and educational levels, including ICT and STEM (Giannakos et al., 2014). However, regarding ICT teaching, existing FCM research has been solely addressed in Higher Education, where a large body of research exists that provides positive evidence on the potential of FCM to provide enhanced student experiences. Despite this evidence, however, no explicit focus has yet been placed on evaluating the FCM in the context of K-12 ICT teaching. This presents an important challenge, especially considering the range of successful implementations of the FCM in other compulsory school education subjects. Thus, the contribution of this paper is to address the aforementioned issue and evaluate the FCM within the context of K-12 ICT curriculum. More specifically, the work presents the design and implementation of an action research for evaluating the capacity of the FCM to enhance students' learning experiences from a range of perspectives, namely (a) cognitive learning outcomes, (b) distribution of different types of learning activities during the face-to-face sessions, (c) levels of motivation during the learning activities, and (d) level of students' engagement during the learning activities. The remainder of the paper is structured as follows. The Background section defines the FCM and describes existing research work on its implementation in Higher Education to enhance students' learning experiences. The Research Methodology section presents the design and methodology of the action research. The Results section presents the findings of the action research in terms of the four research questions defined. Finally, the Discussion and Future Work section presents the conclusions drawn and outlines potential strands of further research. Background The Flipped Classroom Model (FCM) is an emerging blended learning model, which argues for improving the student-centered exploitation of face-to-face sessions, by minimizing teacher lecture and increasing students' active learning and collaboration (Bergmann & Sams, 2012). Teacher-facilitated face-to-face sessions can provide students with unique learning experiences through direct access to both their classmates (for collaborative activities) as well as to feedback and scaffolding by their teacher (DeLozier & Rhodes, 2016). …

[1]  Siu Cheung Kong,et al.  Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Randall S. Davies,et al.  Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course , 2013 .

[3]  Hai Hong,et al.  Gender Differences in Factors Influencing Pursuit of Computer Science and Related Fields , 2015, ITiCSE.

[4]  Hsiu-Ting Hung,et al.  Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning , 2015 .

[5]  Demetrios G. Sampson,et al.  Towards a Teaching Analytics Tool for Supporting Reflective Educational (re) Design in Inquiry-Based STEM Education , 2016, 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT).

[6]  Dipto Sarkar,et al.  A Case-Study on Teaching Undergraduate-Level Software Engineering Course Using Inverted-Classroom, Large-Group, Real-Client and Studio-Based Instruction Model , 2013, ArXiv.

[7]  M. Rhodes,et al.  Flipped Classrooms: a Review of Key Ideas and Recommendations for Practice , 2016, Educational Psychology Review.

[8]  Maria Ijaz Baig,et al.  A study of inverted classroom pedagogy in computer science teaching , 2015 .

[9]  Demetrios G. Sampson,et al.  Teaching and Learning Analytics to Support Teacher Inquiry: A Systematic Literature Review , 2017 .

[10]  สุธััญญา ด้วงอินทร์,et al.  Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day , 2017 .

[11]  Elsje Scott,et al.  A Flipped Classroom Approach to Teaching Systems Analysis, Design and Implementation , 2015 .

[12]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Innovating Pedagogy 2015: Open University Innovation Report 4 , 2015 .

[13]  Russell K. Schutt,et al.  Research Methods in Education , 2011 .

[14]  J. D. Walker,et al.  It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Yasuhiro Hayashi,et al.  Evaluation of A Flipped Classroom & Analysis of Students' Learning Situation in A Computer-Programming Course , 2014, EJC.

[16]  Edward F. Gehringer,et al.  The inverted-lecture model: a case study in computer architecture , 2013, SIGCSE '13.

[17]  Donna Kalmbach Phillips,et al.  Becoming a Teacher through Action Research: Process, Context, and Self-Study , 2006 .

[18]  M. Joy Research Methods in Education (6th Edition) , 2007 .

[19]  Ashish Amresh,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of flipped classrooms for teaching CS1 , 2013, 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[20]  James D. Foley,et al.  Evaluating a Web Lecture Intervention in a Human–Computer Interaction Course , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[21]  Kurt Lewin,et al.  Resolving social conflicts : selected papers on group dynamics , 1948 .

[22]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Gerald C. Gannod,et al.  Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering , 2008, 2008 ACM/IEEE 30th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[24]  Meg Fryling,et al.  Full Flip, Half Flip and No Flip:Evaluation of Flipping an Introductory Programming Course , 2016 .

[25]  John Krogstie,et al.  Reviewing the flipped classroom research: reflections for computer science education , 2014, CSERC.

[26]  Rajiv Ramnath,et al.  Student and instructor experiences in the inverted classroom , 2012, 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings.

[27]  Nooritawati Md Tahir,et al.  Case study of jigsaw cooperative learning effect within Electrical Engineering courses , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications.

[28]  Pei-Di Shen,et al.  Exploring the Effects of Student-Centered Project-Based Learning with Initiation on Students' Computing Skills: A Quasi-Experimental Study of Digital Storytelling , 2015, Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ..

[29]  Baharuddin Aris,et al.  The influences of Flipped Classroom: A meta analysis , 2014, 2014 IEEE 6th Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED).

[30]  Peter N. Posch,et al.  Teachers Investigate Their Work: An introduction to action research across the professions , 1993 .

[31]  J. Keller Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS Model Approach , 2009 .

[32]  Kathleen E. Cook,et al.  Comparing the Effectiveness of an Inverted Classroom to a Traditional Classroom in an Upper-Division Engineering Course , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[33]  Diane Horton,et al.  Comparing outcomes in inverted and traditional CS1 , 2014, ITiCSE '14.

[34]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[35]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Toward a Learning Ecosystem to Support Flipped Classroom: A Conceptual Framework and Early Results , 2016 .

[36]  Betty Love,et al.  Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course , 2014 .

[37]  Eurydice Developing Key Competences at School in Europe Challenges and Opportunities for Policy , 2012 .

[38]  Håkan Jonsson,et al.  Using flipped classroom, peer discussion, and just-in-time teaching to increase learning in a programming course , 2015, 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[39]  Andrew K. Shenton Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects , 2004, Educ. Inf..

[40]  C. Ennis Partnership for 21st Century Skills , 2018 .

[41]  Solène Hazouard Rapports OCDE. OCDE, Economic Policy Reforms 2015 – Going for Growth ; OCDE, Measuring the Digital Economy – A New Perspective , 2015 .

[42]  Embry-Riddle Aeronautical,et al.  The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research , 2013 .

[43]  Eun Choi,et al.  Applying Inverted Classroom to Software Engineering Education , 2013 .

[44]  Hsiu-Ying Wang,et al.  Comparison of the effects of project-based computer programming activities between mathematics-gifted students and average students , 2016 .