A novel pulsed STED microscopy method using FastFLIM and the phasor plots

Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy is a powerful super-resolution microscopy technique that enables observation of macromolecular complexes and sub-cellular structures with spatial resolution below the diffraction limit. The spatial resolution of STED is limited by power of the depletion laser at the specimen plane. Higher depletion laser power will improve resolution, but at the cost of increased photo-bleaching, photo-toxicity, and anti-stoke emission background. This degrades the signal-to-noise ratio, and can significantly limit STED applications in living specimens. Here, we present an efficient multi-color STED microscopy method based on the digital frequency domain fluorescence lifetime imaging (FastFLIM) and the phasor plots. Our approach utilizes a combination of pulsed excitation and pulsed depletion lasers to record the time-resolved photons by FastFLIM. We demonstrate that the resolution is improved without increasing the depletion laser power by digital separation of the depleted species from the partially depleted species based on their different decay kinetics. We show the utility of this novel STED method applied in both fixed and live cellular samples, and also show its application to fluorescence lifetime correlation spectroscopy (FLCS) measurements. By combining fluorophores with different fluorescence lifetimes, we simultaneously record two-color STED images of cells labeled with Atto655 and Alexa647 in a single scan by using a single pair of excitation and depletion lasers. This novel approach shortens the data acquisition time while minimizing the photo-toxicity caused when using two separate depletion lasers.

[1]  Yuansheng Sun,et al.  FLIM Analysis using the Phasor Plots , 2015 .

[2]  Mark Bates,et al.  Three-Dimensional Super-Resolution Imaging by Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy , 2008, Science.

[3]  Alberto Diaspro,et al.  The 2015 super-resolution microscopy roadmap , 2015, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics.

[4]  Alberto Diaspro,et al.  Encoding and decoding spatio-temporal information for super-resolution microscopy , 2015, Nature Communications.

[5]  X. Zhuang,et al.  Whole cell 3D STORM reveals interactions between cellular structures with nanometer-scale resolution , 2008, Nature Methods.

[6]  S. Hell Far-field optical nanoscopy , 2010 .

[7]  Mark Bates,et al.  Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. , 2009, Annual review of biochemistry.

[8]  Enrico Gratton,et al.  A novel fluorescence lifetime imaging system that optimizes photon efficiency , 2008, Microscopy research and technique.

[9]  Alberto Diaspro,et al.  STED nanoscopy: a glimpse into the future , 2015, Cell and Tissue Research.

[10]  A. Clayton,et al.  AB‐plot assisted determination of fluorophore mixtures in a fluorescence lifetime microscope using spectra or quenchers , 2005, Journal of microscopy.

[11]  Michael A. Lampson,et al.  Optogenetic control of organelle transport using a photocaged chemical inducer of dimerization , 2015, Current Biology.

[12]  Alberto Diaspro,et al.  STED-FLCS: An Advanced Tool to Reveal Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Molecular Membrane Dynamics , 2015, Nano letters.

[13]  Christian Eggeling,et al.  Fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy in subdiffraction focal volumes. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[14]  S. Hell Microscopy and its focal switch , 2008, Nature Methods.

[15]  P. Verveer,et al.  Graphical representation and multicomponent analysis of single‐frequency fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy data , 2004, Journal of microscopy.

[16]  S. Hess,et al.  Three-dimensional sub–100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples , 2008, Nature Methods.

[17]  Suliana Manley,et al.  Superresolution imaging using single-molecule localization. , 2010, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[18]  S. Hell,et al.  Sharper low-power STED nanoscopy by time gating , 2011, Nature Methods.

[19]  S. Hell,et al.  Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. , 1994, Optics letters.

[20]  E. Gratton,et al.  The phasor approach to fluorescence lifetime imaging analysis. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Alberto Diaspro,et al.  Gated‐sted microscopy with subnanosecond pulsed fiber laser for reducing photobleaching , 2016, Microscopy research and technique.

[22]  R. Clegg,et al.  Polar Plot Representation for Frequency-Domain Analysis of Fluorescence Lifetimes , 2005, Journal of Fluorescence.

[23]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution , 2006, Science.

[24]  Michael D. Mason,et al.  Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[25]  Marcus Dyba,et al.  Photostability of a fluorescent marker under pulsed excited-state depletion through stimulated emission. , 2003, Applied optics.

[26]  S. Hell,et al.  Direct observation of the nanoscale dynamics of membrane lipids in a living cell , 2009, Nature.

[27]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Stable small quantum dots for synaptic receptor tracking on live neurons. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[28]  Sang Hak Lee,et al.  Labeling proteins inside living cells using external fluorophores for microscopy , 2016, eLife.

[29]  E. Gratton,et al.  Phasor approach to fluorescence lifetime microscopy distinguishes different metabolic states of germ cells in a live tissue , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  S. Hell,et al.  Subdiffraction resolution in far-field fluorescence microscopy. , 1999, Optics letters.

[31]  Giuseppe Vicidomini,et al.  STED Nanoscopy with Time-Gated Detection: Theoretical and Experimental Aspects , 2013, PloS one.