A new measure of Verbal–Imagery Cognitive Style: VICS

Concern has been raised about the reliability of Ridings (1991) verbal–imagery dimension of the popular Cognitive Style Analysis (CSA) test (Peterson, Deary, & Austin, 2003a, 2003b; Rezaei & Katz, 2004). This led Peterson (2003) to develop a new test of Verbal–Imagery Cognitive Style (the VICS test). We report the development of the VICS test and the findings from two studies which compare the reliability of the VICS with the CSAs verbal–imagery dimension. In the first study, 50 participants completed the VICS and the verbal–imagery dimension of the CSA test twice, about a week apart. The verbal–imagery style ratios, which are used in both tests to assess a persons verbal–imagery cognitive style, showed high internal consistency (r > 0.72) and acceptable stability at re-test (r = 0.56.) on the new VICS test, but there was poor internal consistency (r < 0.03) and low test re-test reliability (r < 0.31) on the CSA and an extended version of the CSA. The second study confirmed these results in an independent sample of 100 participants. It is concluded that the new VICS test is a reliable measure of verbal–imagery cognitive style. 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  Larry Katz,et al.  Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the cognitive styles analysis , 2004 .

[2]  R. Moyer,et al.  Mental comparison and the symbolic distance effect , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  I. Deary,et al.  Are intelligence and personality related to verbal-imagery and wholistic-analytic cognitive styles? , 2005 .

[4]  G. Āllport Personality: A Psychological Interpretation , 1938 .

[5]  Ian J. Deary,et al.  On the assessment of cognitive style: four red herrings , 2003 .

[6]  R. Riding,et al.  Cognitive Styles—an overview and integration , 1991 .

[7]  R. Riding On the Nature of Cognitive Style , 1997 .

[8]  Ian J. Deary,et al.  The reliability of Riding’s Cognitive Style Analysis test , 2003 .

[9]  Elizabeth R. Peterson,et al.  Cognitive style: the reliability and validity of verbal-imagery and wholistic-analytic cognitive style , 2002 .

[10]  A. Paivio Perceptual comparisons through the mind’s eye , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[11]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[12]  A. Furnham Test taking style, personality traits and psychometric validity , 2001 .

[13]  R. Riding,et al.  Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies , 2013 .

[14]  R. Mayer,et al.  Three Facets of Visual and Verbal Learners: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Style, and Learning Preference. , 2003 .

[15]  Joachim Tiedemann,et al.  Measures of Cognitive Styles: A Critical Review , 1989 .

[16]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles , 2001 .